What I'm hearing (QB edition)...
Comments
-
Kim loves Lindquist cause he's a Sark recruitBlowItUp said:
this would be less than 24 hours after the LPT release a podcast saying that Lindquist will be the starter for BSU. Betting against them is amazingly effective.insinceredawg said:Browning has won the starting job and will start at Boise State.
-
I am waiting for official word on Browning playing at all this year to make fun of Kim with a video he posted. Just biding my time.
-
I know you are being sarcastic but Lindquist was Nussmeier's guy. Sark never really wanted him....he wanted Miles.insinceredawg said:
Kim loves Lindquist cause he's a Sark recruitBlowItUp said:
this would be less than 24 hours after the LPT release a podcast saying that Lindquist will be the starter for BSU. Betting against them is amazingly effective.insinceredawg said:Browning has won the starting job and will start at Boise State.
-
After the bowl game last year, all 3 predicted Carta-Samuels to start and began pumping him up.BlowItUp said:
this would be less than 24 hours after the LPT release a podcast saying that Lindquist will be the starter for BSU. Betting against them is amazingly effective.insinceredawg said:Browning has won the starting job and will start at Boise State.
-
Am I to understand Ron Mexico is not a viable option?
-
Its not like puppy didnt call it the day he signed, then the 2nd week of spring....and I was the only one.
Nobody, especially the dawgman deuch's, realizes how crappy Lindy is as a passer. Browning WAS SIGNED TO START from day 1.
If he doesnt its because he's just not ready. At a legit 6-2 210 is fucking ready. Fetters said jake wasnt physically ready. Price was 185lbs when he started as a sophomore. Fetters is a fing idiot -
Fetters just doubled down on it saying he 'wont believe it until Pete says it'
Jude meanwhile has been hinting at it for a week and a half now:
-
I was actually surprised seeing Browning last week. He is bigger than I thought, and looks like he will fill out nicely.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Its not like puppy didnt call it the day he signed, then the 2nd week of spring....and I was the only one.
Nobody, especially the dawgman deuch's, realizes how crappy Lindy is as a passer. Browning WAS SIGNED TO START from day 1.
If he doesnt its because he's just not ready. At a legit 6-2 210 is fucking ready. Fetters said jake wasnt physically ready. Price was 185lbs when he started as a sophomore. Fetters is a fing idiot -
Puppy do! Will beat spread for sure. Straight up? Mmmmm!
-
Didn't he say Lindy would start, USC would win the South, and the Pac-12 wouldn't suck? When was he right? Am I missing something?WilburHooksHands said:
Actually he was right about last year.doogsinparadise said:
You never talk about the times that he's right, oh wait...ThomasFremont said:I'm just glad PLSS is wrong.
Again. -
He called 8 wins and the team still being a bunch of assjockeys.PurpleJ said:
Didn't he say Lindy would start, USC would win the South, and the Pac-12 wouldn't suck? When was he right? Am I missing something?WilburHooksHands said:
Actually he was right about last year.doogsinparadise said:
You never talk about the times that he's right, oh wait...ThomasFremont said:I'm just glad PLSS is wrong.
Again. -
Nah, PL_SS has always been against Lindquist. He did say USC would win the South, though.PurpleJ said:
Didn't he say Lindy would start, USC would win the South, and the Pac-12 wouldn't suck? When was he right? Am I missing something?WilburHooksHands said:
Actually he was right about last year.doogsinparadise said:
You never talk about the times that he's right, oh wait...ThomasFremont said:I'm just glad PLSS is wrong.
Again.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/19492/anyone-still-think-sark-and-his-senior-wont-win-the-conference/p1 -
Puppy predicted that the Swede would play well at Hawaii and grab the starting job for good. In puppy's defense he had no fucking clue whether or not the Swede could hit the broad side of a barn when he made that prediction. It's like Kim says...these situations are fluid. Puppy wasn't wrong when he said it.PurpleJ said:
Didn't he say Lindy would start, USC would win the South, and the Pac-12 wouldn't suck? When was he right? Am I missing something?WilburHooksHands said:
Actually he was right about last year.doogsinparadise said:
You never talk about the times that he's right, oh wait...ThomasFremont said:I'm just glad PLSS is wrong.
Again. -
Prefer Jeff "future-accountant" Lindquist, simply because he can better withstand a beating behind our offensive line.
-
1 out of 4 aint bad!WilburHooksHands said:
He called 8 wins and the team still being a bunch of assjockeys.PurpleJ said:
Didn't he say Lindy would start, USC would win the South, and the Pac-12 wouldn't suck? When was he right? Am I missing something?WilburHooksHands said:
Actually he was right about last year.doogsinparadise said:
You never talk about the times that he's right, oh wait...ThomasFremont said:I'm just glad PLSS is wrong.
Again.
-
I prefer winning. Lindquist sucks. He's a nervous kid playing QB. No accuracy. No moxie.Passion said:Prefer Jeff "future-accountant" Lindquist, simply because he can better withstand a beating behind our offensive line.
I don't think some realize how bad he really is. He was worse than Cyler Miles from the day they stepped on campus. Mickens was asked about the QB's recently and didn't even mention Lindquist. Tosh Lupoi said UW would be lucky to win 5 games last year if Lindquist was the starting QB. He's not good and never was going to be the answer, so why waste everyone's time by starting him because he's "safe." -
I agree that lindquist sucks (hence the "future accountant" label). Browning may take over...soon.RoadDawg55 said:
I prefer winning. Lindquist sucks. He's a nervous kid playing QB. No accuracy. No moxie.Passion said:Prefer Jeff "future-accountant" Lindquist, simply because he can better withstand a beating behind our offensive line.
I don't think some realize how bad he really is. He was worse than Cyler Miles from the day they stepped on campus. Mickens was asked about the QB's recently and didn't even mention Lindquist. Tosh Lupoi said UW would be lucky to win 5 games last year if Lindquist was the starting QB. He's not good and never was going to be the answer, so why waste everyone's time by starting him because he's "safe."
But Browning has consistently thrown more pics in practice than lindquist, and lindquist is also more durable. With so much unknown about the O-line, and in a hostile environment, I don't support throwing Browning to the lions this early. If this team was stellar at every position (other than QB), then fine, put Browning out there.
Either way it will be interesting. -
It's almost like I wrote a TL,DR scouting report last fall saying the exact same thing.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I was actually surprised seeing Browning last week. He is bigger than I thought, and looks like he will fill out nicely.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Its not like puppy didnt call it the day he signed, then the 2nd week of spring....and I was the only one.
Nobody, especially the dawgman deuch's, realizes how crappy Lindy is as a passer. Browning WAS SIGNED TO START from day 1.
If he doesnt its because he's just not ready. At a legit 6-2 210 is fucking ready. Fetters said jake wasnt physically ready. Price was 185lbs when he started as a sophomore. Fetters is a fing idiot -
That was good chit. Good call, #mydooglesDoogles said:
It's almost like a wrote a TL,DR scouting report last fall saying the exact same thing.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I was actually surprised seeing Browning last week. He is bigger than I thought, and looks like he will fill out nicely.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Its not like puppy didnt call it the day he signed, then the 2nd week of spring....and I was the only one.
Nobody, especially the dawgman deuch's, realizes how crappy Lindy is as a passer. Browning WAS SIGNED TO START from day 1.
If he doesnt its because he's just not ready. At a legit 6-2 210 is fucking ready. Fetters said jake wasnt physically ready. Price was 185lbs when he started as a sophomore. Fetters is a fing idiot -
I thought Browning looked like the best QB last Friday.
Now if I had to guess, Browning is going to play most of the game but Lindquist is going to get a handful of snaps in the Wildcat / trick plays. Good way to give Browning a break while taking advantage of Lindquist's running ability / size and maybe even catch them in 1 on 1 coverage deep with Lenius (since Lindquist has the arm to throw it up deep).Passion said:
I agree that lindquist sucks (hence the "future accountant" label). Browning may take over...soon.RoadDawg55 said:
I prefer winning. Lindquist sucks. He's a nervous kid playing QB. No accuracy. No moxie.Passion said:Prefer Jeff "future-accountant" Lindquist, simply because he can better withstand a beating behind our offensive line.
I don't think some realize how bad he really is. He was worse than Cyler Miles from the day they stepped on campus. Mickens was asked about the QB's recently and didn't even mention Lindquist. Tosh Lupoi said UW would be lucky to win 5 games last year if Lindquist was the starting QB. He's not good and never was going to be the answer, so why waste everyone's time by starting him because he's "safe."
But Browning has consistently thrown more pics in practice than lindquist, and lindquist is also more durable. With so much unknown about the O-line, and in a hostile environment, I don't support throwing Browning to the lions this early. If this team was stellar at every position (other than QB), then fine, put Browning out there.
Either way it will be interesting. -
I guess Sugar Steve whooooshed us all with his undying Lindy support.
*slurp* -
Pretty sure this is NOT true.
With the inexperience at OL and Lindquist's running ability/depth at RB, UW is going with an option heavy ground game on offense. Guaranteed.
Browning is tiny. Behind that OL he is dead meat.
Rumors of the Lindquist led option package have been circulating for a few weeks now over at Dawgman. Reporters aren't allowed to comment, but fans have seen things at practice.
The REAL question is whether it will resemble the up-tempo read option that Oregon runs, or a more power oriented option run scheme like Ga Tech and the service schools run.
Either way it will be interesting.
-
Sounds legitGrundleStiltzkin said:Pretty sure this is NOT true.
With the inexperience at OL and Lindquist's running ability/depth at RB, UW is going with an option heavy ground game on offense. Guaranteed.
Browning is tiny. Behind that OL he is dead meat.
Rumors of the Lindquist led option package have been circulating for a few weeks now over at Dawgman. Reporters aren't allowed to comment, but fans have seen things at practice.
The REAL question is whether it will resemble the up-tempo read option that Oregon runs, or a more power oriented option run scheme like Ga Tech and the service schools run.
Either way it will be interesting. -
So some guy on a fringe message bored is more credible than Dawgman and their vast network of resources???
Good one, fella. -
Looks like from UW Husky board True Freshmen QB Jake Browning won the starting job. http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/22191/what-im-hearing-qb-edition
Sounds very reputable.....redface -
This offense should run the ball more than navy. Under no circumstance should this team throw the ball more than 25 times a game a preferably less than 20. The team has some physical backs and decent tight ends. Ball control, solid special teams, defense and a power run offense. Christ doesnt that remind of some teams weve rooted for in the past.
-
Not bad for an alcoholic who struck out with a lesbianDoogles said:
It's almost like I wrote a TL,DR scouting report last fall saying the exact same thing.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I was actually surprised seeing Browning last week. He is bigger than I thought, and looks like he will fill out nicely.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Its not like puppy didnt call it the day he signed, then the 2nd week of spring....and I was the only one.
Nobody, especially the dawgman deuch's, realizes how crappy Lindy is as a passer. Browning WAS SIGNED TO START from day 1.
If he doesnt its because he's just not ready. At a legit 6-2 210 is fucking ready. Fetters said jake wasnt physically ready. Price was 185lbs when he started as a sophomore. Fetters is a fing idiot -
You have a secret admirer on the BSU bored.Passion said:
I agree that lindquist sucks (hence the "future accountant" label). Browning may take over...soon.RoadDawg55 said:
I prefer winning. Lindquist sucks. He's a nervous kid playing QB. No accuracy. No moxie.Passion said:Prefer Jeff "future-accountant" Lindquist, simply because he can better withstand a beating behind our offensive line.
I don't think some realize how bad he really is. He was worse than Cyler Miles from the day they stepped on campus. Mickens was asked about the QB's recently and didn't even mention Lindquist. Tosh Lupoi said UW would be lucky to win 5 games last year if Lindquist was the starting QB. He's not good and never was going to be the answer, so why waste everyone's time by starting him because he's "safe."
But Browning has consistently thrown more pics in practice than lindquist, and lindquist is also more durable. With so much unknown about the O-line, and in a hostile environment, I don't support throwing Browning to the lions this early. If this team was stellar at every position (other than QB), then fine, put Browning out there.
Either way it will be interesting.
I'm too lazy to screen shot it.. -
They've been doing MMA & Yoga sessions to make up for their lack of experience. So Browning should be fine.Gladstone said:The coaches must be more high on our OL's ability to protect the QB than many here, including me, thought.
