Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
But how is Ted Miller an FS sports journalist?
Hippopeteamus
Member Posts: 1,958
Comments
-
Hilarious. Any standard measurement (wins, division titles, conference titles, etc) he fails miserably, but games decided by 4 pts or less? Sure.
Now do blowout losses. -
Beating OSU or EWU by 4 or less is always special
-
-
-
2009 - USC (3 pt win), Arizona (3 pt win), UCLA (1 pt loss) versus 3 blow out losses (17 points or more)
2010 - USC (1 pt win), Oregon State (1 pt win), Cal (1 pt win) versus 4 blow out losses
2011 - EWU (3 pt win) versus 5 blow out losses
2012 - Stanford (3 pt win), Oregon State (3 pt win), Wazzu (3 pt loss), Boise State (2 pt loss) versus 3 blow out losses
2013 - Stanford (3 pt loss) versus 2 blow out losses
So in 5 years, Sark was 8-4 in close games (4 points or less) with 17 blow out losses of 17 points or more. -
So basically Sark achieved this heady 8-4 record by struggling with teams he should have blown out and by failing to keep his losses close. Cool stuff, Ted.
-
Today's example of how stats can lead you wrong if you don't match the stats to what your eyes are seeing
-
Or, classic confirmation bias.Tequilla said:Today's example of how stats can lead you wrong if you don't match the stats to what your eyes are seeing
-
"All of Sark's critics" = Hardcore Husky
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=omhoUYoSDlM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FjwxRw6-tA4
