Any Pac-12 coaches on the hot seat?
Comments
-
Sark
Whittingham
maybe McIntyre
Sark -
Cal - Probably can't afford to fire Dykes.
Stanford - Nope.
OSU - Nope.
RapeU - Nope.
WSU - Can't afford to fire Leach.
UW - Nope.
USC - No hot seat yet (see: Haden, Pat) after Alabama 2016 his seat will be on fire.
UCLA - Nope.
Utah - if they struggle Whittingham will be on the hot seat.
Colorado - Don't know if they really care.
UA - Nope.
ASU - Nope.
-
Not a HC, but Wilcox is about to be a sacrificial goat.
-
Anyone else think Haden is canned before Sark?
-
If Utah has a losing season this year, I think Whittingham "leaves" for the ACC.
I could see Utah potentially losing every road game + a few at home. They were lucky last year.
http://www.utahutes.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/utah-m-footbl-sched.html -
Utah beat Fresno State last year 59-27. I don't see them losing at Fresno this year.priapism said:If Utah has a losing season this year, I think Whittingham "leaves" for the ACC.
I could see Utah potentially losing every road game + a few at home. They were lucky last year.
http://www.utahutes.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/utah-m-footbl-sched.html
I think Utah will take a step back next season but still be good enough to go bowling. -
Utah has no money. They can't pay their assistants and it is part of the rift between hill and wittingham. It's more likely he leaves than is fired. That fan base creamed their pants over going 5-4 last year. He isn't getting fired.
-
Helfrich*
* I get all my new from Hardcore Husky. -
I'm seeing a situation where USC gets clobbered by 'Bama (ILTCTBIWILTD) and bounces back by the end of the season. 'Bama then loses in the SEC title game, doesn't give a fuck and plays USC in a bowl game in which USC wins in dominating fashion leading Trooj faithful to believe Sark "figured it out".CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Cal - Probably can't afford to fire Dykes.
Stanford - Nope.
OSU - Nope.
RapeU - Nope.
WSU - Can't afford to fire Leach.
UW - Nope.
USC - No hot seat yet (see: Haden, Pat) after Alabama 2016 his seat will be on fire.
UCLA - Nope.
Utah - if they struggle Whittingham will be on the hot seat.
Colorado - Don't know if they really care.
UA - Nope.
ASU - Nope.
Or in less TLDR fashion, Sark 2010 replays itself in 2016. -
'Bama's going full Deliverance on Sark. That game should have an NC-17 rating.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I'm seeing a situation where USC gets clobbered by 'Bama (ILTCTBIWILTD) and bounces back by the end of the season. 'Bama then loses in the SEC title game, doesn't give a fuck and plays USC in a bowl game in which USC wins in dominating fashion leading Trooj faithful to believe Sark "figured it out".CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Cal - Probably can't afford to fire Dykes.
Stanford - Nope.
OSU - Nope.
RapeU - Nope.
WSU - Can't afford to fire Leach.
UW - Nope.
USC - No hot seat yet (see: Haden, Pat) after Alabama 2016 his seat will be on fire.
UCLA - Nope.
Utah - if they struggle Whittingham will be on the hot seat.
Colorado - Don't know if they really care.
UA - Nope.
ASU - Nope.
Or in less TLDR fashion, Sark 2010 replays itself in 2016.









