Countdown to Kimberly calling everyone miserable and saying a win is a win....
Comments
-
Fuck, you dont need Kim to say it...I'll do it. A win is a win.
As always, LIFPO -
Last year, UW folds and loses that game. I will give them credit for that. They still looked sloppy and undisciplined, but they didn't fold.
-
He has brainwashed enough morons over there to do that for him. The big discussion on dawgman right now is whether it should be "allowed" for people to be critical of the team after a win
-
I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
-
Yale isn't impressed, doogs piling on. Same as it ever was.
-
ftfygreenblood said:Last 12 years, UW folds and loses that game. I will give them credit for that. They still looked sloppy and undisciplined, but they didn't fold.
-
ASJ did look like shit though.......TheHB said:I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
-
Whos Kim????
Kim Grinolds - strait outta Renton.
Selling split-levels and tri-levels like its going outta style. Part time.
Warshington footballer, full time. -
Not going to disagree, but how often did Sark put him in position to not look like shit? Dude is 7 foot 8 and weighs 460 pounds, and he's throwing him the ball to the sidelines? That takes a special kind of dumbass playcaller.He_Needs_More_Time said:
ASJ did look like shit though.......TheHB said:I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
-
Still hungover?He_Needs_More_Time said:
ASJ did look like shit though.......TheHB said:I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
-
He wasn't a factor at all and only time you heard his name was for a dumb penalty.TheHB said:
Not going to disagree, but how often did Sark put him in position to not look like shit? Dude is 7 foot 8 and weighs 460 pounds, and he's throwing him the ball to the sidelines? That takes a special kind of dumbass playcaller.He_Needs_More_Time said:
ASJ did look like shit though.......TheHB said:I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
-
On defense we looked fundamentally sound but not spectacular. On offense, we look like we have purpose and an identity. I loved the willingness to run the ball at key times for the most part. Price has improved in confidence and performance.
Against the upper echelon this team will lose most games.
So... A road win is a solid win. This team so far looks better than last year and seems destined for 8-5 and maybe 9-4. -
I wonder if the coaching staff is "allowed" to be critical after a game, win or lose?bananasnblondes said:He has brainwashed enough morons over there to do that for him. The big discussion on dawgman right now is whether it should be "allowed" for people to be critical of the team after a win
"Critical" as in objectively looking at outcomes & individual player performance to seek improvements to the team.
Asking questions. . .you know, actually fucking thinking about what worked and what didn't.
I'm sure that never happens.
Doogs gotta doog.
Fuck.
-
Sark is attempting to reach Belloti status. Use offense to win the games you should after blowing the lead and upsetting better teams on occasion. 8-4 average with a BCS bowls once a decade
-
Belloti is probably a good comparison. That is the high water mark for Sark. Sadly, if Sark gets us the decade Belotti had, Doogs will anoint him. Oregon, who is serious about football allegedly, jettisoned him for a REALLY good Coach, not just a serviceable one.RaceBannon said:Sark is attempting to reach Belloti status. Use offense to win the games you should after blowing the lead and upsetting better teams on occasion. 8-4 average with a BCS bowls once a decade
-
Sark isn't as good as Bellotti. Mediocre Mike won 9,6,7,8,9 games in years 1-5 with inferior talent.
-
Sark needs to keep up with Chan Gailey first. He's nowhere near Bellotti yet.Swaye said:
Belloti is probably a good comparison. That is the high water mark for Sark. Sadly, if Sark gets us the decade Belotti had, Doogs will anoint him. Oregon, who is serious about football allegedly, jettisoned him for a REALLY good Coach, not just a serviceable one.RaceBannon said:Sark is attempting to reach Belloti status. Use offense to win the games you should after blowing the lead and upsetting better teams on occasion. 8-4 average with a BCS bowls once a decade
-
Correct and considering how young UCLA is makes me hate Sark all the more...We have never improved game 1 to 2. Just don't understand Sarky. But I said Illini no gimme, but that's just because I knew we'd be sloppy and the playcalling terrible (until 2nd half, then beyond.DerekJohnson said:On defense we looked fundamentally sound but not spectacular. On offense, we look like we have purpose and an identity. I loved the willingness to run the ball at key times for the most part. Price has improved in confidence and performance.
Against the upper echelon this team will lose most games.
So... A road win is a solid win. This team so far looks better than last year and seems destined for 8-5 and maybe 9-4. -
Stick a pencil in your eye. This is a 9 win team with a 6 win coach. They will win 7.
-
You fucking bunch of retards need to lrn2read.
I said it would be Sark's high water mark. That means he hasn't reached it yet, but a Bellotti type record would be the best we ever got out of him. In short, after his 5-6 year internship ends, he might produce like Bellotti, which would have Doogs blowing loads in their skinny jeans but have the rest of us wishing we were a TUFF football school who fired 9, 6, 7, 8, and 9 win Coaches and hired m'fers who smoke weed and talk shit like Chip Kelly.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
