AP: Job market's new normal: Smaller workforce, sluggish pay
Comments
-
hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ECONOMY_THE_NEW_JOB_MARKET?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-07-04-10-24-16skjlkjeosnosniodoifnoaaanananana is your source?!?!??
-
Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not? -
Fuck off
-
Obama's amerika is heading the way of Greece. -
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not? -
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not? -
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath. -
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill. -
Since you are johnny on the spot, why don't you produce the line-item citation for all of us to see?2001400ex said:
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill.
We'll wait patiently, but per usual we won't expect much. -
http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-employer-mandate/pawz said:
Since you are johnny on the spot, why don't you produce the line-item citation for all of us to see?2001400ex said:
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill.
We'll wait patiently, but per usual we won't expect much. -
Pay the insurance or pay the penalty if you have over 50 employees. Seems pretty simple to me. You might want to read your own link next time dummy.2001400ex said:
http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-employer-mandate/pawz said:
Since you are johnny on the spot, why don't you produce the line-item citation for all of us to see?2001400ex said:
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill.
We'll wait patiently, but per usual we won't expect much. -
Pretty funny when a dipshit drives his BS right into a wall
-
Are you that FS?greenblood said:
Pay the insurance or pay the penalty if you have over 50 employees. Seems pretty simple to me. You might want to read your own link next time dummy.2001400ex said:
http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-employer-mandate/pawz said:
Since you are johnny on the spot, why don't you produce the line-item citation for all of us to see?2001400ex said:
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill.
We'll wait patiently, but per usual we won't expect much. -
Code for "I've got nothing"2001400ex said:
Are you that FS?greenblood said:
Pay the insurance or pay the penalty if you have over 50 employees. Seems pretty simple to me. You might want to read your own link next time dummy.2001400ex said:
http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-employer-mandate/pawz said:
Since you are johnny on the spot, why don't you produce the line-item citation for all of us to see?2001400ex said:
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill.
We'll wait patiently, but per usual we won't expect much. -
Read for comprehension.greenblood said:
Code for "I've got nothing"2001400ex said:
Are you that FS?greenblood said:
Pay the insurance or pay the penalty if you have over 50 employees. Seems pretty simple to me. You might want to read your own link next time dummy.2001400ex said:
http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-employer-mandate/pawz said:
Since you are johnny on the spot, why don't you produce the line-item citation for all of us to see?2001400ex said:
Show me where it says any employer has to pay one penny for the cost of insurance to any employee.pawz said:
Let me help you dumbmotherfucker with a math equation. I'll type slow so you can follow along.2001400ex said:
Read up on FTEs, or full time equivalents. Those 2 20 workers are the exact same as 1 40 hour worker.greenblood said:
Solely definitely is not the case. It looks like a little of both to me. However it's impossible to argue that healthcare reform hasn't totally messed up full time employment. It's now much less expensive to hire two 20 hour workers than one 40 hour worker. Simple fact2001400ex said:Thursday's monthly jobs report from the government showed that employers added a solid 223,000 jobs in June and that the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent from 5.5 percent in May. Even so, the generally improving job market still bears traits that have long been regarded as weaknesses.
The unemployment rate didn't fall in June because more people were hired. The rate fell solely because the number of people who had become dispirited and stopped looking for work far exceeded the number who found jobs.
I'm confused. Is there more jobs or not?
1 40-hour work must be paid hourly plus obamacare.
2 20-hour works must be paid hourly only
therefore the cost of
1 40-hour work is > 2 20-hour workers
Hope this helps. But I'm not holding me breath.
You are fucking stupid. Read the bill.
We'll wait patiently, but per usual we won't expect much. -
I really hope both Honda and d2d are trolling us. I weep for humanity that there are actually dumb fuck that eat up everything their preferred political party tells them.
-
Refute one fact I've posted.RoadDawg55 said:I really hope both Honda and d2d are trolling us. I weep for humanity that there are actually dumb fuck that eat up everything their preferred political party tells them.
-
The fact sheet is correct, but your interpretation and reading comprehension is where life has failed you.2001400ex said:
Refute one fact I've posted.RoadDawg55 said:I really hope both Honda and d2d are trolling us. I weep for humanity that there are actually dumb fuck that eat up everything their preferred political party tells them.
-
Talking Points and hyperlinks aren't 'facts'. HTH2001400ex said:
Refute one fact I've posted.RoadDawg55 said:I really hope both Honda and d2d are trolling us. I weep for humanity that there are actually dumb fuck that eat up everything their preferred political party tells them.
-
Real world experience and critical application are woefully sorry as well.greenblood said:
The fact sheet is correct, but your interpretation and reading comprehension is where life has failed you.2001400ex said:
Refute one fact I've posted.RoadDawg55 said:I really hope both Honda and d2d are trolling us. I weep for humanity that there are actually dumb fuck that eat up everything their preferred political party tells them.
Again, how much do you make a a paid political message bored shill? Is it enough to live out of mommy's basement? -
You brought jokes? Lol yet neither of you have refuted a fact. Nice work.pawz said:
Real world experience and critical application are woefully sorry as well.greenblood said:
The fact sheet is correct, but your interpretation and reading comprehension is where life has failed you.2001400ex said:
Refute one fact I've posted.RoadDawg55 said:I really hope both Honda and d2d are trolling us. I weep for humanity that there are actually dumb fuck that eat up everything their preferred political party tells them.
Again, how much do you make a a paid political message bored shill? Is it enough to live out of mommy's basement? -
So when again are you going to refute a single fact? I've been waiting for months...
And yes, this is the new normal until overall govt policy changes...and who knows when that will be.
-
You do realize that your own source using your metrics showed that the Republican years of 2001-2007, using conservative philosophies of cutting taxes and going into war, only brought hours worked to what they were when Clinton left office.HoustonHusky said:So when again are you going to refute a single fact? I've been waiting for months...
And yes, this is the new normal until overall govt policy changes...and who knows when that will be.
Sorry you don't like your own facts.
But let's try this. What would you do to fix the situation? -
Is easy really. You make health insurers and providers compete for the business. Single prayer.2001400ex said:
You do realize that your own source using your metrics showed that the Republican years of 2001-2007, using conservative philosophies of cutting taxes and going into war, only brought hours worked to what they were when Clinton left office.HoustonHusky said:So when again are you going to refute a single fact? I've been waiting for months...
And yes, this is the new normal until overall govt policy changes...and who knows when that will be.
Sorry you don't like your own facts.
But let's try this. What would you do to fix the situation?
Or scrap it all together.
As it sits, you championed an artificial monopoly - even an idiot in his first week of econ 101 knows - which only benefits said providers/insurers.
What's worse is the middle class you claim to espouse for bears the overwhelming majority of that burden.
#thanksobama -
How many wars has Obama started?
-
The O/U is always 5.sarktastic said:How many wars has Obama started?
-
Huh? Govt shrunk under Bush? Additional govt programs like expanded Medicare didn't happen? Clinton didn't run bombing campaigns throughout Europe and the Middle East?2001400ex said:
You do realize that your own source using your metrics showed that the Republican years of 2001-2007, using conservative philosophies of cutting taxes and going into war, only brought hours worked to what they were when Clinton left office.HoustonHusky said:So when again are you going to refute a single fact? I've been waiting for months...
And yes, this is the new normal until overall govt policy changes...and who knows when that will be.
Sorry you don't like your own facts.
But let's try this. What would you do to fix the situation?
And Bush had lots of problems...he did some good and some bad...but nobody (sans you since you are a babbling moron) holds him up as an government conservative. But at least he didn't murder the median income the way Obama has.
God you are a moron. -
Weird, the worst recession in 80 years cause median incomes to drop. Notice how you don't extend the chart out to 2015. More misinformation.HoustonHusky said:
Huh? Govt shrunk under Bush? Additional govt programs like expanded Medicare didn't happen? Clinton didn't run bombing campaigns throughout Europe and the Middle East?2001400ex said:
You do realize that your own source using your metrics showed that the Republican years of 2001-2007, using conservative philosophies of cutting taxes and going into war, only brought hours worked to what they were when Clinton left office.HoustonHusky said:So when again are you going to refute a single fact? I've been waiting for months...
And yes, this is the new normal until overall govt policy changes...and who knows when that will be.
Sorry you don't like your own facts.
But let's try this. What would you do to fix the situation?
And Bush had lots of problems...he did some good and some bad...but nobody (sans you since you are a babbling moron) holds him up as an government conservative. But at least he didn't murder the median income the way Obama has.
God you are a moron. -
Maybe a third term would fix things
-
You don't fix shit overnight after Owen 12.RaceBannon said:Maybe a third term would fix things
