Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
2018 will be special
Comments
-
Good stuff #55. K-State also beat Auburn for 59 minutes too. If not for Pete Carroll's butterfingered draft pick, Kstate beats Auburn at the beginning of the year. and the SEC shows what it is, a heavily over-inflated conference, in every facet. .RoadDawg55 said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. A team that goes 2-6 in conference is mediocre at best. Rewarding them with a #12 ranking is ridiculous. And while the SEC was a strong conference, they also shit the bed come bowl season. Ole Miss was plungered, Miss State was beaten soundly, Auburn lost to a Wisconsin team coming off a 59-0 loss, LSU lost to a mediocre Notre Dame.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Arkansas lost a late season game to Missouri after their impressive 47-0 two game stretch. They were plungered by Auburn and Georgia. They improved as the season went along and the arrow is pointing up, but they weren't close to being the #12 team.
Kansas State beat Texas 23-0. UCLA beat Texas by 3. Was Kansas State 20 points better than UCLA? No, and UCLA beat Kansas State in the bowl game. Stanford lost to ASU, who was plungered by UCLA. Than Stanford plungered UCLA. Comparing scores is futile.
By the way careabout and all you SEC buttsniffers, Did you know KSTATE had 15 fucking WALKONS on the field, most in BIG roles? ESPN says the best talent is in the south. Florida, Texas and Cali have the talent (which is why the SEC is looking everywhere but "their South" for players and raiding these states. Florida nor Texas are 'southern' states..
If you're going to tout the SEC, Run it thru puppy first so I can objectively discard it before it reaches the viwers here. -
Huh?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good stuff #55. K-State also beat Auburn for 59 minutes too. If not for Pete Carroll's butterfingered draft pick, Kstate beats Auburn at the beginning of the year. and the SEC shows what it is, a heavily over-inflated conference, in every facet. .RoadDawg55 said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. A team that goes 2-6 in conference is mediocre at best. Rewarding them with a #12 ranking is ridiculous. And while the SEC was a strong conference, they also shit the bed come bowl season. Ole Miss was plungered, Miss State was beaten soundly, Auburn lost to a Wisconsin team coming off a 59-0 loss, LSU lost to a mediocre Notre Dame.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Arkansas lost a late season game to Missouri after their impressive 47-0 two game stretch. They were plungered by Auburn and Georgia. They improved as the season went along and the arrow is pointing up, but they weren't close to being the #12 team.
Kansas State beat Texas 23-0. UCLA beat Texas by 3. Was Kansas State 20 points better than UCLA? No, and UCLA beat Kansas State in the bowl game. Stanford lost to ASU, who was plungered by UCLA. Than Stanford plungered UCLA. Comparing scores is futile.
By the way careabout and all you SEC buttsniffers, Did you know KSTATE had 15 fucking WALKONS on the field, most in BIG roles? ESPN says the best talent is in the south. Florida, Texas and Cali have the talent (which is why the SEC is looking everywhere but "their South" for players and raiding these states. Florida nor Texas are 'southern' states..
If you're going to tout the SEC, Run it thru puppy first so I can objectively discard it before it reaches the viwers here.
-
I actually agree about close losses, which is one of the problems with SRS.EwaDawg said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. In fact ITS BOOBSfs to say close loses are ANYTHING but Fucking Losses.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Beating 4 top 25 teams isn't impressive when you shit away a home game against Stanford to win your division though. UCLA was bipolar as hell last year. -
I remember during the gayme, the buttsnifers made every excuse in the world for the reigning runner-up. If the SEC was half as great as they claimed, Allbarn wouldn't have had any problem. If their thief QB had been suspended, they would have lost....but ESPN talks about Winston non-stop...no stories on all the SEC players and their thievery and rapes though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good stuff #55. K-State also beat Auburn for 59 minutes too. If not for Pete Carroll's butterfingered draft pick, Kstate beats Auburn at the beginning of the year. and the SEC shows what it is, a heavily over-inflated conference, in every facet. .RoadDawg55 said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. A team that goes 2-6 in conference is mediocre at best. Rewarding them with a #12 ranking is ridiculous. And while the SEC was a strong conference, they also shit the bed come bowl season. Ole Miss was plungered, Miss State was beaten soundly, Auburn lost to a Wisconsin team coming off a 59-0 loss, LSU lost to a mediocre Notre Dame.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Arkansas lost a late season game to Missouri after their impressive 47-0 two game stretch. They were plungered by Auburn and Georgia. They improved as the season went along and the arrow is pointing up, but they weren't close to being the #12 team.
Kansas State beat Texas 23-0. UCLA beat Texas by 3. Was Kansas State 20 points better than UCLA? No, and UCLA beat Kansas State in the bowl game. Stanford lost to ASU, who was plungered by UCLA. Than Stanford plungered UCLA. Comparing scores is futile.
By the way careabout and all you SEC buttsniffers, Did you know KSTATE had 15 fucking WALKONS on the field, most in BIG roles? ESPN says the best talent is in the south. Florida, Texas and Cali have the talent (which is why the SEC is looking everywhere but "their South" for players and raiding these states. Florida nor Texas are 'southern' states..
If you're going to tout the SEC, Run it thru puppy first so I can objectively discard it before it reaches the viwers here. -
Speaking of bipolar, Jim Mora says, "Hello"TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I actually agree about close losses, which is one of the problems with SRS.EwaDawg said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. In fact ITS BOOBSfs to say close loses are ANYTHING but Fucking Losses.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Beating 4 top 25 teams isn't impressive when you shit away a home game against Stanford to win your division though. UCLA was bipolar as hell last year. -
It was weed and tinted windows.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I remember during the gayme, the buttsnifers made every excuse in the world for the reigning runner-up. If the SEC was half as great as they claimed, Allbarn wouldn't have had any problem. If their thief QB had been suspended, they would have lost....but ESPN talks about Winston non-stop...no stories on all the SEC players and their thievery and rapes though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good stuff #55. K-State also beat Auburn for 59 minutes too. If not for Pete Carroll's butterfingered draft pick, Kstate beats Auburn at the beginning of the year. and the SEC shows what it is, a heavily over-inflated conference, in every facet. .RoadDawg55 said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. A team that goes 2-6 in conference is mediocre at best. Rewarding them with a #12 ranking is ridiculous. And while the SEC was a strong conference, they also shit the bed come bowl season. Ole Miss was plungered, Miss State was beaten soundly, Auburn lost to a Wisconsin team coming off a 59-0 loss, LSU lost to a mediocre Notre Dame.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Arkansas lost a late season game to Missouri after their impressive 47-0 two game stretch. They were plungered by Auburn and Georgia. They improved as the season went along and the arrow is pointing up, but they weren't close to being the #12 team.
Kansas State beat Texas 23-0. UCLA beat Texas by 3. Was Kansas State 20 points better than UCLA? No, and UCLA beat Kansas State in the bowl game. Stanford lost to ASU, who was plungered by UCLA. Than Stanford plungered UCLA. Comparing scores is futile.
By the way careabout and all you SEC buttsniffers, Did you know KSTATE had 15 fucking WALKONS on the field, most in BIG roles? ESPN says the best talent is in the south. Florida, Texas and Cali have the talent (which is why the SEC is looking everywhere but "their South" for players and raiding these states. Florida nor Texas are 'southern' states..
If you're going to tout the SEC, Run it thru puppy first so I can objectively discard it before it reaches the viwers here. -
The first 6 thieves and rapes are consensual in the SEC.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I remember during the gayme, the buttsnifers made every excuse in the world for the reigning runner-up. If the SEC was half as great as they claimed, Allbarn wouldn't have had any problem. If their thief QB had been suspended, they would have lost....but ESPN talks about Winston non-stop...no stories on all the SEC players and their thievery and rapes though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good stuff #55. K-State also beat Auburn for 59 minutes too. If not for Pete Carroll's butterfingered draft pick, Kstate beats Auburn at the beginning of the year. and the SEC shows what it is, a heavily over-inflated conference, in every facet. .RoadDawg55 said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. A team that goes 2-6 in conference is mediocre at best. Rewarding them with a #12 ranking is ridiculous. And while the SEC was a strong conference, they also shit the bed come bowl season. Ole Miss was plungered, Miss State was beaten soundly, Auburn lost to a Wisconsin team coming off a 59-0 loss, LSU lost to a mediocre Notre Dame.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Arkansas lost a late season game to Missouri after their impressive 47-0 two game stretch. They were plungered by Auburn and Georgia. They improved as the season went along and the arrow is pointing up, but they weren't close to being the #12 team.
Kansas State beat Texas 23-0. UCLA beat Texas by 3. Was Kansas State 20 points better than UCLA? No, and UCLA beat Kansas State in the bowl game. Stanford lost to ASU, who was plungered by UCLA. Than Stanford plungered UCLA. Comparing scores is futile.
By the way careabout and all you SEC buttsniffers, Did you know KSTATE had 15 fucking WALKONS on the field, most in BIG roles? ESPN says the best talent is in the south. Florida, Texas and Cali have the talent (which is why the SEC is looking everywhere but "their South" for players and raiding these states. Florida nor Texas are 'southern' states..
If you're going to tout the SEC, Run it thru puppy first so I can objectively discard it before it reaches the viwers here. -
So were their first 6 BCS titles in a row over college football nation. Then the butthurt began, then the excuses, then the rape whistle was being max blown.PurpleThrobber said:
The first 6 thieves and rapes are consensual in the SEC.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I remember during the gayme, the buttsnifers made every excuse in the world for the reigning runner-up. If the SEC was half as great as they claimed, Allbarn wouldn't have had any problem. If their thief QB had been suspended, they would have lost....but ESPN talks about Winston non-stop...no stories on all the SEC players and their thievery and rapes though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good stuff #55. K-State also beat Auburn for 59 minutes too. If not for Pete Carroll's butterfingered draft pick, Kstate beats Auburn at the beginning of the year. and the SEC shows what it is, a heavily over-inflated conference, in every facet. .RoadDawg55 said:
I completely disagree. I don't have a problem with SRS, and think it can be useful, but it's not the bible either. It's a formula. Results are results. Beating 4 top 25 teams is better than beating one. I don't think close losses should be rewarded. A team that goes 2-6 in conference is mediocre at best. Rewarding them with a #12 ranking is ridiculous. And while the SEC was a strong conference, they also shit the bed come bowl season. Ole Miss was plungered, Miss State was beaten soundly, Auburn lost to a Wisconsin team coming off a 59-0 loss, LSU lost to a mediocre Notre Dame.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Arkansas lost a late season game to Missouri after their impressive 47-0 two game stretch. They were plungered by Auburn and Georgia. They improved as the season went along and the arrow is pointing up, but they weren't close to being the #12 team.
Kansas State beat Texas 23-0. UCLA beat Texas by 3. Was Kansas State 20 points better than UCLA? No, and UCLA beat Kansas State in the bowl game. Stanford lost to ASU, who was plungered by UCLA. Than Stanford plungered UCLA. Comparing scores is futile.
By the way careabout and all you SEC buttsniffers, Did you know KSTATE had 15 fucking WALKONS on the field, most in BIG roles? ESPN says the best talent is in the south. Florida, Texas and Cali have the talent (which is why the SEC is looking everywhere but "their South" for players and raiding these states. Florida nor Texas are 'southern' states..
If you're going to tout the SEC, Run it thru puppy first so I can objectively discard it before it reaches the viwers here. -
Christ.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Its an objective formula. UCLA was #14.RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas lost to Alabama by 1, Miss St by 7 on the road and crushed Ole Miss and LSU by a combined 47-0. They also beat Texas by 24 in the bowl game who UCLA only beat by 3 at the start of the year. Their last 5 games against Texas and 4 ranked teams they only gave up 9ppg.
Definitive.definitive.combo.relative/date.combo of nonsense
But, still.. . -
fuk SEC and fuk UCLA and fuk u
