2018 will be special
Travis Haney, ESPN Staff Writer
There were four newcomers to the 2015 Future Power Rankings, our Insiders’ three-year projection for the best teams in college football. TCU (12), Tennessee (16), Ole Miss (22) and Arizona State (25) all joined the top 25. So there’s room for change from year to year.
Which programs have the best chance to climb into the 2016 edition of the Future Power Rankings? Here are the top contenders to trend upward, beginning with the most likely:
1. Washington Huskies (FPR: 33)
This three-year projection is squarely centered on the track record of Huskies head coach Chris Petersen. Petersen, entering his second season at U-Dub, went a ridiculous 92-12 at Boise State. The competition level is ramped up in the Pac-12, granted, but so is the level of talent Petersen has at hand.
In addition to 92 wins at his previous stop, Petersen won eight games in his first season in Seattle; his predecessor, Steve Sarkisian, won eight games once in his five years (his final season). So, it’s a better start for Petersen than perhaps perceived.
The university resources and the recruiting turf are well above average -- certainly better than the landscape Petersen experienced, and thrived, in at Boise. There are compelling reasons to believe the Huskies will climb by 2017, even in a division that includes Oregon and Stanford. Petersen is No. 1.
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/travis-haney/insider/post?id=4349
Comments
-
Disagree. 2021 will be special.SonnyShackelford said:Future Power Rankings: Outside looking in
Travis Haney, ESPN Staff Writer
There were four newcomers to the 2015 Future Power Rankings, our Insiders’ three-year projection for the best teams in college football. TCU (12), Tennessee (16), Ole Miss (22) and Arizona State (25) all joined the top 25. So there’s room for change from year to year.
Which programs have the best chance to climb into the 2016 edition of the Future Power Rankings? Here are the top contenders to trend upward, beginning with the most likely:
1. Washington Huskies (FPR: 33)
This three-year projection is squarely centered on the track record of Huskies head coach Chris Petersen. Petersen, entering his second season at U-Dub, went a ridiculous 92-12 at Boise State. The competition level is ramped up in the Pac-12, granted, but so is the level of talent Petersen has at hand.
In addition to 92 wins at his previous stop, Petersen won eight games in his first season in Seattle; his predecessor, Steve Sarkisian, won eight games once in his five years (his final season). So, it’s a better start for Petersen than perhaps perceived.
The university resources and the recruiting turf are well above average -- certainly better than the landscape Petersen experienced, and thrived, in at Boise. There are compelling reasons to believe the Huskies will climb by 2017, even in a division that includes Oregon and Stanford. Petersen is No. 1.
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/travis-haney/insider/post?id=4349
See thescript.gif -
That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes -
No it isn't.SonnyShackelford said:Future Power Rankings: Outside looking in
Travis Haney, ESPN Staff Writer
There were four newcomers to the 2015 Future Power Rankings, our Insiders’ three-year projection for the best teams in college football. TCU (12), Tennessee (16), Ole Miss (22) and Arizona State (25) all joined the top 25. So there’s room for change from year to year.
Which programs have the best chance to climb into the 2016 edition of the Future Power Rankings? Here are the top contenders to trend upward, beginning with the most likely:
1. Washington Huskies (FPR: 33)
This three-year projection is squarely centered on the track record of Huskies head coach Chris Petersen. Petersen, entering his second season at U-Dub, went a ridiculous 92-12 at Boise State. The competition level is ramped up in the Pac-12, granted, but so is the level of talent Petersen has at hand.
In addition to 92 wins at his previous stop, Petersen won eight games in his first season in Seattle; his predecessor, Steve Sarkisian, won eight games once in his five years (his final season). So, it’s a better start for Petersen than perhaps perceived.
The university resources and the recruiting turf are well above average -- certainly better than the landscape Petersen experienced, and thrived, in at Boise. There are compelling reasons to believe the Huskies will climb by 2017, even in a division that includes Oregon and Stanford. Petersen is No. 1.
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/travis-haney/insider/post?id=4349 -
Travis Haney is your source?
obligatory... -
But in 2018 the team will be young
-
Everybody does it.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
-
Take off LSU and Notre Dame in 2009 for Georgia State and Eastern like Peterman had and Sark is at 7-5 before the bowl game. Sad, but true.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes -
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon. -
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC). -
RoadDawg55 said:
They were better than UW, but that's ridiculous. They beat one team that finished in the top 25, and that was a free falling Ole Miss that was plungered in their bowl game.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
8 wins and #41 in SRS.RaceBannon said:That article illustrates why so many schools have shit schedules. 8 wins!!!1111!!!
Nobody even looks at how bad the wins were and how many games the team playes
Arkansas was 7-6 but was #12 in SRS...better than every pac-12 school but Oregon.
UCLA beat four teams that finished in the top 25 (#12 ASU, #18 Kansas State, #19 Arizona, #20 USC).
Arkansas would have plungered UCLA last year







