Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
New Bleenor Gem
jmc84
Member Posts: 499
Phil made a poast about how too many people in the doogman prediction thread were underestimating our defense, and some guy responded with a stat backed poast on why he disagreed. Bleenor's response: "It was a statement, not a question.". Arrogant prick. Definitely going to be using that line, however.
Comments
-
I stand by my statement
-
Who gives a fuck?
I stand by my question. -
That has potential as a HHBism
-
Agree.DerekJohnson said:That has potential as a HHBism
-
It was a statement not a questiontracker said:
Who gives a fuck?
I stand by my question. -
Take any statement into the realm of comment and see how fast and hard you fall into Bleener's overflowing one-holer.
-
Already made a thread about this last night.
-
It was a statement, not a question.He_Needs_More_Time said:Already made a thread about this last night.
Some of you need to learn the difference. -
Hard to read the difference when doing 90 on I-5 while doing blow off a hookers ass.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It was a statement, not a question.He_Needs_More_Time said:Already made a thread about this last night.
Some of you need to learn the difference. -
According to Bleenor, he has taken every single variable into consideration; the simpletons have not. That's why his analysis is infallible.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
