Thanks Sark and Woody
2015 is the first season since 1979 that Washington hasn’t technically played at least one non-conference game vs. a team from a Power league. That was the year it faced Wyoming (WAC), Utah (WAC), Fresno State (PCAA) and Pitt (an Independent).
First they ended our streak of never playing a D1-AA school and now this.
Comments
-
But why do they call Sark Pool Boy?
-
House Money ... bitches!
-
You would have fired Don James
-
3 of our 4 wins right there. It is important to get the fans pumped for the mid-season 3 game plungering skid.
-
At least Sark landed in a situation that has him playing Alabama and ND next year, which will most likely end his coaching days in the Pac12 for awhile.
-
Bama, ND, @UCLA, @Stanford, Oregon, @UW, @Utah...BallSacked said:At least Sark landed in a situation that has him playing Alabama and ND next year, which will most likely end his coaching days in the Pac12 for awhile.
2016 should be a fun year for a new QB and probably new DC after Wilcox is let go. -
Just to clarify, the skid is on the handle.UWerentThereMan said:3 of our 4 wins right there. It is important to get the fans pumped for the mid-season 3 game plungering skid.
-
I wonder how badly Hayden and Sark are working to get out of that dealBallSacked said:At least Sark landed in a situation that has him playing Alabama and ND next year, which will most likely end his coaching days in the Pac12 for awhile.
-
Front porch.
-
Pittsburgh was pretty freaking good, better than any team on our 2015 schedule.
That was back in the day when there were *real* teams that were independents.
I have said before that 1979 rivals 1990 as our most underrated team ever. The two teams that beat us had 1 combined loss. -
The schedule is not the problem. We suck again regardless of who,we play.
-
The schedule is a reflection of Washington's attitude toward football.AtomicDawg said:The schedule is not the problem. We suck again regardless of who,we play.
-
crispedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The schedule is a reflection of WashingtonAtomicDawg said:The schedule is not the problem. We suck again regardless of who,we play.
's attitude toward football.dammit! -
This is Sark's schedule. Didn't Peterson at least add Michigan recently?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The schedule is a reflection ofAtomicDawg said:The schedule is not the problem. We suck again regardless of who,we play.
Washington'sSark's attitude toward football. -
First they ended our streak of never playing a D1-AA school and now this.whatshouldicareabout said:http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/05/power-five-teams-that-wont-play-power-non-conference-opponent-2015/
2015 is the first season since 1979 that Washington hasn’t technically played at least one non-conference game vs. a team from a Power league. That was the year it faced Wyoming (WAC), Utah (WAC), Fresno State (PCAA) and Pitt (an Independent).
Put together a complete game vs. Eastern then come back and pop off. -
Why would we wanna do that?ApostleofGrief said:
Put together a complete game vs. Eastern then come back and pop off.whatshouldicareabout said:http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/05/power-five-teams-that-wont-play-power-non-conference-opponent-2015/
2015 is the first season since 1979 that Washington hasn’t technically played at least one non-conference game vs. a team from a Power league. That was the year it faced Wyoming (WAC), Utah (WAC), Fresno State (PCAA) and Pitt (an Independent).
First they ended our streak of never playing a D1-AA school and now this.
We show up arrogant and drunk and halfass the whole game and still beat them.
Also, learn how to quote shit on here. -
Pitt had a pretty good quarterback
-
who was a freshman punter in that gameRaceBannon said:Pitt had a pretty good quarterback
-
That was game 6. Dan took over in game 7 when the starter was hurt. I recall a lot of buzz before the game that Pitt might change to the phenomDerekJohnson said:
who was a freshman punter in that gameRaceBannon said:Pitt had a pretty good quarterback
-
Well, the problem is scheduling bad teams. A contender i-aa puts on a good show at least. Last year's eastern game was the only interesting ooc game at all! And it is also good to see how guys mostly from this state can compete in huskie stadium.whatshouldicareabout said:
Why would we wanna do that?ApostleofGrief said:
Put together a complete game vs. Eastern then come back and pop off.whatshouldicareabout said:http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/05/power-five-teams-that-wont-play-power-non-conference-opponent-2015/
2015 is the first season since 1979 that Washington hasn’t technically played at least one non-conference game vs. a team from a Power league. That was the year it faced Wyoming (WAC), Utah (WAC), Fresno State (PCAA) and Pitt (an Independent).
First they ended our streak of never playing a D1-AA school and now this.
We show up arrogant and drunk and halfass the whole game and still beat them.
Also, learn how to quote shit on here. -
Peterman*BallSacked said:
This is Sark's schedule. Didn't Peterson at least add Michigan recently?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The schedule is a reflection ofAtomicDawg said:The schedule is not the problem. We suck again regardless of who,we play.
Washington'sSark's attitude toward football. -
Lots of football schools play shitty schedules through the years. ohio state is one of them unless you think scheduling va tech makes your dick bigger.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The schedule is a reflection of Washington's attitude toward football.AtomicDawg said:The schedule is not the problem. We suck again regardless of who,we play.
Beat Minnesota. Nothing else matters.
It has more to do with college football in general. Uw was just one of the last to convert.
