Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Brett Hundley not yet drafted

13

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,928
    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,928
    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.

    But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,928
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.

    Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,928
    edited May 2015
    MisterEm said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.

    Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.

    HTH
    You say hth as if I'm not already aware of that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,928
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.
    He had no real coaching until getting to the NFL

    A college coach that just said, "run us to victory, Jack the Lad" was all the coaching he needed

    You're right about him being FS and not going to Oregon.

    He also kisses his mother on the lips.

    WOOF
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter