Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Brett Hundley not yet drafted

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,227 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
Mora imploding?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    Hundley > Miles

    Tallest midget.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DeepSeaZ
    DeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    Tree guy is all SEC all the time
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KoolAidMan
    KoolAidMan Member Posts: 319
    My sources are telling me that Hundley rubbed teams the wrong way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Packers traded up to nab him in the 5th. Final confirmation of what many suspected: he made a mistake by skipping his senior year. Still, Hundley is a specimen. He'd have made a nice understudy to Wilson, IMO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Can't wait for someone to trade GB a first round pick for him in 3 years. Then he'll get 25 million guaranteed and suck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    TTJ said:

    Still, Hundley is a specimen.

    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    allpurpleallgold said:

    Can't wait for someone to trade GB a first round pick for him in 3 years. Then he'll get 25 million guaranteed and suck.

    SCREEEEECHH!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    TTJ said:

    Packers traded up to nab him in the 5th. Final confirmation of what many suspected: he made a mistake by skipping his senior year. Still, Hundley is a specimen. He'd have made a nice understudy to Wilson, IMO.

    Disagree.

    Rumor has it UCLA is on the brink of implosion.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,579 Standard Supporter
    You can get away with a ton of flaws in college that can't be masked in the pros. That even goes for the S E C. See Tebone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,380
    Yeah he's going to be a 3rd string guy in 2015 and maaaybe the #2 guy in 2016 or 2017.

    He's going to need a lot of coaching to work on his internal clock and reading defenses...54 percent of his pass attempts were from six yards and in, including 29 percent from behind the line of scrimmage. Hard to imagine anything close to those rates that in the NFL.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Citrus4Troogs
    Citrus4Troogs Member Posts: 248
    edited May 2015
    TTJ said:

    Final confirmation of what many suspected: he made a mistake by not leaving last year.

    Hundley would likely have gone in round 2 last year and be currently entering his second year of $5-6M/4 years. Staying an extra year seems to be hazardous to the financial health of most well-regarded college QBs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SpoonieLuv said:

    the whiter jake locker

    Hundley is twice as good as Jack ever was
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited May 2015
    TTJ said:

    Packers traded up to nab him in the 5th. Final confirmation of what many suspected: he made a mistake by skipping his senior year. Still, Hundley is a specimen. He'd have made a nice understudy to Wilson, IMO.

    If anything he made a mistake returning. Had he left he could have duped a franchise into seeing the upside without another 13 starts of film.

    Brett Hundley, much like Jack Lockner, could have been in college for 7 years (they're called doctors) and they would still read and react to defenses slowly and poorly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,227 Founders Club
    If he becomes a very good starter in the NFL, we can probably blame Mora and his staff for sucking on the developmental side of things.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.

    But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.

    Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    edited May 2015
    MisterEm said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.

    Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.

    HTH
    You say hth as if I'm not already aware of that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    BallSacked said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Locker >>>> Hundley.

    UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

    UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley

    I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

    He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

    Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
    Sark

    and

    Ty Willingham...


    case fucking closed.
    Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.


    Oh. Never mind.
    SvenFS

    I'm not talking about the NFL.


    My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.
    He had no real coaching until getting to the NFL

    A college coach that just said, "run us to victory, Jack the Lad" was all the coaching he needed

    You're right about him being FS and not going to Oregon.

    He also kisses his mother on the lips.

    WOOF
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter