David shaw
Comments
-
Always gotta critize the black man? What the hell? Blame willingham for losing, don't give shaw credit for winning. I hate this place after the Zimmerman trial.section8 said:I like to be handed the keys to a good team and then talk like it was my vision and commitment that got said team to where its currently at, I like to do that.
-
I like to be handed the keys to a good team and then talk like it was my vision and commitment that got said team to where its currently at, I like to do that.
Ray-siss
-
Nobody hates on Shaw in here but the facts are he took over a well oiled machine. Just like if Helfrich does well we won't fully give him credit either as he was handed a great program.bananasnblondes said:While the book is far from written on David Shaw, I do not understand the pure hatred people have for him. At first I thought it was a doogman thing but apparently it is over here too. All the guy has done since taking over as head coach is go 24-4 leading successful campaigns for two years without Gerhart, and for a year without Luck, he has won a Rose Bowl, and he hauled in an absolutely ridiculous recruiting class (if you like linemen): http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=9&c=8&toinid=734&sspid=-1&yr=2012
He also would have destroyed Sark last year had Hogan been given the reigns at that point.
Should Larry Coker get credit for what he did at Miami? -
Its too early to call Shaw Harbaugh, AND it's too early to call him Coker. Until he actually has a continually worse record from one year to the next like Coker did, he's not Coker yet.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Nobody hates on Shaw in here but the facts are he took over a well oiled machine. Just like if Helfrich does well we won't fully give him credit either as he was handed a great program.bananasnblondes said:While the book is far from written on David Shaw, I do not understand the pure hatred people have for him. At first I thought it was a doogman thing but apparently it is over here too. All the guy has done since taking over as head coach is go 24-4 leading successful campaigns for two years without Gerhart, and for a year without Luck, he has won a Rose Bowl, and he hauled in an absolutely ridiculous recruiting class (if you like linemen): http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=9&c=8&toinid=734&sspid=-1&yr=2012
He also would have destroyed Sark last year had Hogan been given the reigns at that point.
Should Larry Coker get credit for what he did at Miami?
As always, LIFPO.
-
Haha, nice race. I see your agenda. More interested in the line play on both sides for the ball and a nasty front 7 and the fact they aren't the latest copy cat offense.RaceBannon said:Little Jimmy posting about a Black guy again
-
That's basically what I'm saying. I don't know if Shaw is a good or bad coach and we probably won't know until a few years from now.dnc said:
Its too early to call Shaw Harbaugh, AND it's too early to call him Coker. Until he actually has a continually worse record from one year to the next like Coker did, he's not Coker yet.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Nobody hates on Shaw in here but the facts are he took over a well oiled machine. Just like if Helfrich does well we won't fully give him credit either as he was handed a great program.bananasnblondes said:While the book is far from written on David Shaw, I do not understand the pure hatred people have for him. At first I thought it was a doogman thing but apparently it is over here too. All the guy has done since taking over as head coach is go 24-4 leading successful campaigns for two years without Gerhart, and for a year without Luck, he has won a Rose Bowl, and he hauled in an absolutely ridiculous recruiting class (if you like linemen): http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=9&c=8&toinid=734&sspid=-1&yr=2012
He also would have destroyed Sark last year had Hogan been given the reigns at that point.
Should Larry Coker get credit for what he did at Miami?
As always, LIFPO. -
I don't see how you can expect Shaw to do well when Stanford went 1-11 seven years ago.
-
Shaw is a puncher. It was his choice to sit Hogan. He also tells verbals to other universities to visit the farm and not tell anyone but your parents then call the other university at the 11th hour and leave a voice message at 11:30 PM on the office phone. Total Donut hole puncher.bananasnblondes said:While the book is far from written on David Shaw, I do not understand the pure hatred people have for him. At first I thought it was a doogman thing but apparently it is over here too. All the guy has done since taking over as head coach is go 24-4 leading successful campaigns for two years without Gerhart, and for a year without Luck, he has won a Rose Bowl, and he hauled in an absolutely ridiculous recruiting class (if you like linemen): http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=9&c=8&toinid=734&sspid=-1&yr=2012
He also would have destroyed Sark last year had Hogan been given the reigns at that point.
-
There's no way the Trees can keep up this pace when no traditional power has done it since scholarships were reduced.
-
wtfay?topdawgnc said:I don't see how you can expect Shaw to do well when Stanford went 1-11 seven years ago.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
