What's your bold prediction for Husky Football in 2015?

Doogs will be calling for blood after a sub 500 season. Too many unscarred youth will be starting. Our offensive scheme sure appeared to suck last season also. I'm thinking more of the same this year with an average defense.

Tequilla said:

1-2 non-conference
6-3 conference
close bowl loss

7-6 overall

Normally I wouldn't encourage a boobs talking point, but if Peterson or any P12 coach loses to Utah State or Sac State they should be fired and lit ablaze at the 50 yard line.

BallSacked said:

Tequilla said:

1-2 non-conference
6-3 conference
close bowl loss

7-6 overall

Normally I wouldn't encourage a boobs talking point, but if Peterson or any P12 coach loses to Utah State or Sac State they should be fired and lit ablaze at the 50 yard line.

Like the Colorado St game?

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Tequilla said:

1-2 non-conference
6-3 conference
close bowl loss

7-6 overall

So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?

I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

3-0 non-conference
5-4 conference
1-0 win shitty bowl game
9-4 overall

And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.

Dardanus said:

Tequilla said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Tequilla said:

1-2 non-conference
6-3 conference
close bowl loss

7-6 overall

So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?

I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

3-0 non-conference
5-4 conference
1-0 win shitty bowl game
9-4 overall

And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.

So if they improve throughout the year, have culture turnover, and are playing best in November, why the close bowl loss?

I expect that they will play a team that is a little better than them if they 6-3 in conference - similar to how we played KState in the Holiday Bowl in 1999.

I see at least 2, if not 3, BCS caliber teams in the PAC next year. If that's the case, everybody gets bumped up a bit in the bowl pecking order.

BallSacked said:

Tequilla said:

Dardanus said:

Tequilla said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Tequilla said:

1-2 non-conference
6-3 conference
close bowl loss

7-6 overall

So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?

I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

3-0 non-conference
5-4 conference
1-0 win shitty bowl game
9-4 overall

And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.

So if they improve throughout the year, have culture turnover, and are playing best in November, why the close bowl loss?

I expect that they will play a team that is a little better than them if they 6-3 in conference - similar to how we played KState in the Holiday Bowl in 1999.

I see at least 2, if not 3, BCS caliber teams in the PAC next year. If that's the case, everybody gets bumped up a bit in the bowl pecking order.

Pac12 bowls are shit. If you go 7-5 you'll be playing a shit team. Like Okie st, Maryland or Colorado State (UWs, Stanford's and Utahs opponent).

I believe the selection goes off conference record unless I'm completely mistaken

ApostleofGrief said:

I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman

#Gutsy

Tequilla said:

BallSacked said:

Tequilla said:

1-2 non-conference
6-3 conference
close bowl loss

7-6 overall

Normally I wouldn't encourage a boobs talking point, but if Peterson or any P12 coach loses to Utah State or Sac State they should be fired and lit ablaze at the 50 yard line.

Anybody that knows me well knows that I am a TLDR fuckstick that likes to throw down at the Aurora 7-11, on the Ave in the U-District, on Montlake

Come on now!!!

SpoonieLuv said:

Prediction for my 2015 campaign

Right click, save as

AZDuck said:

SpoonieLuv said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman

Right click, save as

Spoonie's bringin' it this morning

SpoonieLuv said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman

that's a good way to damage a perfectly good stratocaster

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

SpoonieLuv said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman

I can't stop watching this. Who is the black dude and who is the chick?

Afroman.

Fan jumped on stage to rock out with him and got rocked out instead. Concert was stopped, he was arrested offstage, charged with assault and is now being sued.

DerekJohnson said:

SpoonieLuv said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

SpoonieLuv said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman

I can't stop watching this. Who is the black dude and who is the chick?

Afroman.

Fan jumped on stage to rock out with him and got rocked out instead. Concert was stopped, he was arrested offstage, charged with assault and is now being sued.