UCLA WR sells the couch
Comments
-
We could use depth at WR, since we only have 5 scholarship WRs this spring and 4 WRs coming in the spring.BallSacked said:From what I hear, UCLA will allow an intra-conference grad transfer. I wonder if Huskies would take him, because I heard another P12 school might.
He's an okay receiver. Very good leaper and hands. Makes highlight reel catches, but pretty average in every other regard.
Get him in for a season and you can redshirt one additional freshman that would benefit from another year of development. -
Nega Please. This has Leach written all over it.whatshouldicareabout said:
We could use depth at WR, since we only have 5 scholarship WRs this spring and 4 WRs coming in the spring.BallSacked said:From what I hear, UCLA will allow an intra-conference grad transfer. I wonder if Huskies would take him, because I heard another P12 school might.
He's an okay receiver. Very good leaper and hands. Makes highlight reel catches, but pretty average in every other regard.
Get him in for a season and you can redshirt one additional freshman that would benefit from another year of development.
-
Agree, there was no keeping him in Westwood once he saw Pullman...TommySQC said:
Nega Please. This has Leach written all over it.whatshouldicareabout said:
We could use depth at WR, since we only have 5 scholarship WRs this spring and 4 WRs coming in the spring.BallSacked said:From what I hear, UCLA will allow an intra-conference grad transfer. I wonder if Huskies would take him, because I heard another P12 school might.
He's an okay receiver. Very good leaper and hands. Makes highlight reel catches, but pretty average in every other regard.
Get him in for a season and you can redshirt one additional freshman that would benefit from another year of development.
