Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

FUCKOFF Michael Bennett

sarktastic
sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
I hope you find the rusty cheese grater enema you seek.
«1

Comments

  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Yes, but this is the PRO bored, not the TBS bored. His parents benefit from raising such a selfish shithead.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    People like that piss me off. If you have to renegotiate your contract one year into it, then you hired the wrong agent.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    I'm sure when the Hawks cut him next year you'll all be up in arms because he has a CONTRACT.

    FUCKOFF SEAHAWKS.

    Teams like that piss me off. If you have to cut a player before his contract his up then you hired the wrong gm.
  • ScroteDawg
    ScroteDawg Member Posts: 238

    I'm sure when the Hawks cut him next year you'll all be up in arms because he has a CONTRACT.

    FUCKOFF SEAHAWKS.

    Teams like that piss me off. If you have to cut a player before his contract his up then you hired the wrong gm.

    I hope you're joking. Pretty much every NFL contract is structured to not be played to completion.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited March 2015
    Much ado about nothing. He's a hell of a player and the Seahawks need him but he has no leverage. He can get paid $6 million to pay football this year or he can sit out. He might skip training camp and part of preseason, but he's not walking away from $6 million.

    And if he decided to walk away from the game he'd owe the Seahawks the prorated portion of his signing bonus, which is $6 million. So there's a $12 million difference between playing and not playing.

    He'll be on the field this year.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    I'm sure when the Hawks cut him next year you'll all be up in arms because he has a CONTRACT.

    FUCKOFF SEAHAWKS.

    Teams like that piss me off. If you have to cut a player before his contract his up then you hired the wrong gm.

    I hope you're joking. Pretty much every NFL contract is structured to not be played to completion.
    And the rules are structured so players and teams can re-negotiate contracts before completetion. Thank you.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    I'm sure when the Hawks cut him next year you'll all be up in arms because he has a CONTRACT.

    FUCKOFF SEAHAWKS.

    Teams like that piss me off. If you have to cut a player before his contract his up then you hired the wrong gm.

    I hope you're joking. Pretty much every NFL contract is structured to not be played to completion.
    And the rules are structured so players and teams can re-negotiate contracts before completetion. Thank you.
    But he has a CONTRACT!!!!!!!!!!!
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited March 2015

    I'm sure when the Hawks cut him next year you'll all be up in arms because he has a CONTRACT.

    FUCKOFF SEAHAWKS.

    Teams like that piss me off. If you have to cut a player before his contract his up then you hired the wrong gm.

    I hope you're joking. Pretty much every NFL contract is structured to not be played to completion.
    And the rules are structured so players and teams can re-negotiate contracts before completetion. Thank you.
    That's why players demand large sums of guaranteed money. From what I've seen, this isn't about guaranteed money, as it's about the actual amount of the contract. He's also only completed one year of his deal. He saw how Lynch's negotiations went down, and to think that he's going to be treated better is stupid.