Doogman fumbles the RappCulture Commit. Butthurt ensues
Ruth's crew broke the story. Kim didn't even know who committed when it was announced. The result was glorious:
Kim Grinolds wrote:
There is a commit. Trying to track down the kid. Not going to release the name until we can confirm it with the player or his coach.
Working on it. Stay tuned.
Before somebody starts in............We run into this stuff all the time. there was a situation years ago with a certain recruit who was committed to another school who was going to switch schools. Another site leaked it before the kid had a chance to recommit. The other school was pretty pissed and said if he wasn't man enough to tell them, he wasn't worthy of the offer.
If you have to wait a bit, you'll be fine ;-)
Note: At this point, several posters had already said it was Rapp
Poster A (someone who posts here) wrote:
Its ok to just say you have no idea.
Fetters wrote:
And if we didn't know. We would tell you.
We did know. We just wanted to make sure he said it. He did.
Story is on the front page.
-C.
Chris Fetters
The Kim post and second post went poof almost immediately. Luckily Fetters responded to it and it popped back up again
Comments
-
They only have one job. And they suck at it.
-
And they think no one will ever find outif they delete your posts quickly enoughThomasFremont said:They only have one job. And they suck at it.
-
Wow, this is perhaps the most damning evidence of how bad they suck at their job.bananasnblondes said:Kim Grinolds wrote:
There is a commit. Trying to track down the kid. -
Doogman is just god awful....just bottom of barrell scum....
-
You do realize that they are dealing with a crowd who hasn't figured out that 99% of their news is off their RSS Feed, twatters and facebooking accounts.bananasnblondes said:
And they think no one will ever find outif they delete your posts quickly enoughThomasFremont said:They only have one job. And they suck at it.
Do you really think the general audience over there understands that posts get deleted that much? -
Journalistic integrity. Always good to see Kem pull the card of integrity whenever their twitter search button is broken.whatshouldicareabout said:
Wow, this is perhaps the most damning evidence of how bad they suck at their job.bananasnblondes said:Kim Grinolds wrote:
There is a commit. Trying to track down the kid. -
If Ruth is beating you at the game you say you're good at, you need to pour gasoline in your asshole and sit on a torch.
-
1) Bullshit they'd say they didn't know.bananasnblondes said:
Fetters wrote:
And if we didn't know. We would tell you.
We did know. We just wanted to make sure he said it. He did.
Story is on the front page.
-C.
Chris Fetters
2) they didn't know despite the kid poasting pics of himself with coach Pete and Husky Stadium.
It might be time for a dedicated Husky Fan Podcast that goes in depth with some of the BOI, mods, Devs, and OG negas and really put together a good history of the LPT and their sack of lies for the last 15 years. -
Aaaaaand I'm banned. No warning just...
-
Amazing how many times this has to be explained to you fucktards, but here it goes ... again ...
With the LPT, it's not about being first, it's about being RIGHT. Got it?
So that means they come in second ... or third ... or even fourth or fifth ... a lot ... because the LPT only gets it right 19% of the time.
And, just so you understand the importance of being right instead of being first, here's a story:
There once was a kid who did something and while he was doing that something someone said something to someone that just about made something bad happen.
So there you go.
Some of you people, and by that I mean all of you, need to understand that this is a special time for these kids and just because you pay $10.95 a month doesn't entitle you to ruin their special time.
Are we done now? I thought so.
-
Wow, just for saying "it's OK to say you don't know"?FremontTroll said:Aaaaaand I'm banned. No warning just...
-
And post the video here.CheersWestDawg said:If Ruth is beating you at the game you say you're good at, you need to pour gasoline in your asshole and sit on a torch.
-
that's absolutely incredible. it really is stupefying.bananasnblondes said:
Wow, just for saying "it's OK to say you don't know"?FremontTroll said:Aaaaaand I'm banned. No warning just...
-
You just know they were aware of this thread. You contradict Kim there, and it gets mentioned here, there won't even be a warning.DerekJohnson said:
that's absolutely incredible. it really is stupefying.bananasnblondes said:
Wow, just for saying "it's OK to say you don't know"?FremontTroll said:Aaaaaand I'm banned. No warning just...
-
It would be wrong to post this chronology on the free bird.bananasnblondes said:
Ruth's crew broke the story. Kim didn't even know who committed when it was announced. The result was glorious:
Kim Grinolds wrote:
There is a commit. Trying to track down the kid. Not going to release the name until we can confirm it with the player or his coach.
Working on it. Stay tuned.
Before somebody starts in............We run into this stuff all the time. there was a situation years ago with a certain recruit who was committed to another school who was going to switch schools. Another site leaked it before the kid had a chance to recommit. The other school was pretty pissed and said if he wasn't man enough to tell them, he wasn't worthy of the offer.
If you have to wait a bit, you'll be fine ;-)
Note: At this point, several posters had already said it was Rapp
Poster A (someone who posts here) wrote:
Its ok to just say you have no idea.
Fetters wrote:
And if we didn't know. We would tell you.
We did know. We just wanted to make sure he said it. He did.
Story is on the front page.
-C.
Chris Fetters
The Kim post and second post went poof almost immediately. Luckily Fetters responded to it and it popped back up again
Realdawg Roof is playing chess and the LPT is still struggling at checkers (Twatters). -
Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.
But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.
Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time. -
Kim was extra sensitive yesterday because the masses were agreeing with the Troll. I called Kim out for continuing to let SandyLyle post while telling other posters not to respond to Sandy's trolling.bananasnblondes said:
Wow, just for saying "it's OK to say you don't know"?FremontTroll said:Aaaaaand I'm banned. No warning just...
At least five of the proles immediately +1ed me before Kim could make it go poof.
-
Screenshots or it isn't true ...FremontTroll said:Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.
But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.
Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.
And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job? -
Peterman needs to retire the insufferable #woof. When a PSA commits, he should twat #fo,kg.
-
81% also said that UW has a lot of work to do to get Rapp's commitment. Stanford is hard to beat and all that.Tequilla said:
Screenshots or it isn't true ...FremontTroll said:Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.
But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.
Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.
And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job?
Same day, Rapp commits. -
Dialed in as always ...doogville said:
81% also said that UW has a lot of work to do to get Rapp's commitment. Stanford is hard to beat and all that.Tequilla said:
Screenshots or it isn't true ...FremontTroll said:Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.
But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.
Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.
And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job?
Same day, Rapp commits.
Disappointing that nobody on this bored didn't take the comments from Mr 81% and predict a Rapp commit. -
Pretty someone on a different thread restated Ek-Tard's prediction and then said that Rapp was a UW lock.Tequilla said:
Dialed in as always ...doogville said:
81% also said that UW has a lot of work to do to get Rapp's commitment. Stanford is hard to beat and all that.Tequilla said:
Screenshots or it isn't true ...FremontTroll said:Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.
But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.
Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.
And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job?
Same day, Rapp commits.
Disappointing that nobody on this bored didn't take the comments from Mr 81% and predict a Rapp commit.
