Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

President George W. Bush 2007

d2d
d2d Member Posts: 3,109
This is all on Obubba

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RRdoiTH_iZg
«1

Comments

  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    LOL D2D, please look up the Project for the New American Century (1997)

    I recommend all people like yourself become familiar w/ da chooz. It will explain everything
  • d2d
    d2d Member Posts: 3,109

    LOL D2D, please look up the Project for the New American Century (1997)

    I recommend all people like yourself become familiar w/ da chooz. It will explain everything

    I'm waiting for the movie.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Fuck you are stupid. All Obama did was follow through with the plan agreed to by Bush and Iraq. Nice job searching you tube tho.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq

    "In 2008 the American and Iraqi governments signed the U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement, after being sought by the Bush Administration and the Iraqi government. It included a specific date, 30 June 2009, by which American forces should withdraw from Iraqi cities, and a complete withdrawal date from Iraqi territory by 31 December 2011.[27] On 14 December 2008 then-President George W. Bush signed the security agreement with Iraq. In his fourth and final trip to Iraq, President Bush appeared in a televised news conference with Iraq's prime minister Nouri al-Maliki to celebrate the agreement and applauded security gains in Iraq saying that just two years ago "such an agreement seemed impossible"."
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468

    LOL D2D, please look up the Project for the New American Century (1997)

    I recommend all people like yourself become familiar w/ da chooz. It will explain everything

    Obligatory

    image
  • DugtheDoog
    DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    In PNAC in 2000, Cheney basically says they need a "new Pearl Harbor" to get the war machine up and running.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    In PNAC in 2000, Cheney basically says they need a "new Pearl Harbor" to get the war machine up and running.

    Not to mention that "deficits don't matter. We can go to war and cut taxes. We'll just blame the next guy for running up the debt."
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,270
    2001400ex said:

    In PNAC in 2000, Cheney basically says they need a "new Pearl Harbor" to get the war machine up and running.

    Not to mention that "deficits don't matter. We can go to war and cut taxes. We'll just blame the next guy for running up the debt."
    That's the fucktarded post of the day ...

    Just because someone else ran up a deficit (let's forget the reasons behind it for the time being as it really isn't central to the point) doesn't mean that it gives the next guy the right to do the same and shrug the shoulders like it isn't their problem.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    I'm hearing that d2d needs to dig a little deeper.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Tequilla said:

    2001400ex said:

    In PNAC in 2000, Cheney basically says they need a "new Pearl Harbor" to get the war machine up and running.

    Not to mention that "deficits don't matter. We can go to war and cut taxes. We'll just blame the next guy for running up the debt."
    That's the fucktarded post of the day ...

    Just because someone else ran up a deficit (let's forget the reasons behind it for the time being as it really isn't central to the point) doesn't mean that it gives the next guy the right to do the same and shrug the shoulders like it isn't their problem.
    Except the deficit has fallen faster under Obama than any other time since the 1950s. Partially because of Obama (tax increases), partially because the economy (much better now than in 2009), and partially cause Congress can't agree on shit.

    Regardless, cutting taxes and going to war doesnt reduce the deficit.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,023
    2001400ex said:

    Tequilla said:

    2001400ex said:

    In PNAC in 2000, Cheney basically says they need a "new Pearl Harbor" to get the war machine up and running.

    Not to mention that "deficits don't matter. We can go to war and cut taxes. We'll just blame the next guy for running up the debt."
    That's the fucktarded post of the day ...

    Just because someone else ran up a deficit (let's forget the reasons behind it for the time being as it really isn't central to the point) doesn't mean that it gives the next guy the right to do the same and shrug the shoulders like it isn't their problem.
    Except the deficit has fallen faster under Obama than any other time since the 1950s. Partially because of Obama (tax increases), partially because the economy (much better now than in 2009), and partially cause Congress can't agree on shit.

    Regardless, cutting taxes and going to war doesnt reduce the deficit.
    God you are a moron. Take the bailout (ie one-off expense) and Obama hasn't done shite on the budget.

    Keep *Gurgling*...