UW vs. Boise State Officially Friday Sept. 4th
Comments
-
Just like a husky having more interest in Sark losing than UW winning so u would knowTequilla said:Boise's losing some key pieces from last year (notably Ajayi) whereas Washington is clearly in transition from gutted interior of Seven's classes. Honestly, it's not that interesting of a game if you a) take away the Petersen factor), b) eliminate the Boise fans that are going to be salivating at the chance to beat a PAC school that traveled to their building, and c) a Cuog that takes more interest at Washington losing than the Cougs winning.
-
You clearly are confused ...beelzebub said:
Just like a husky having more interest in Sark losing than UW winning so u would knowTequilla said:Boise's losing some key pieces from last year (notably Ajayi) whereas Washington is clearly in transition from gutted interior of Seven's classes. Honestly, it's not that interesting of a game if you a) take away the Petersen factor), b) eliminate the Boise fans that are going to be salivating at the chance to beat a PAC school that traveled to their building, and c) a Cuog that takes more interest at Washington losing than the Cougs winning.
It's fun to make fun of Seven losing ...
The joy I get out of the Huskies winning is 81x better than the joy I get out of Seven falling on his face. -
Actually I'm fine with Friday ...
ANY Friday in 2015....
Cause ... For 2015 ...
TSIO most likely -
Pretty much this ...fivehundredmileDAWG said:Actually I'm fine with Friday ...
ANY Friday in 2015....
Cause ... For 2015 ...
TSIO most likely
There will be some interesting things to look at and watch as the players develop in Year 2 under the Petersen system. It would be nice to see at least one win that comes from left field (Oregon???) where after the game you look at things and shake your head.
But honestly, when you look at the roster, and what is likely to be contributing this year, and then compare to PAC averages, it's hard not to see that Petersen's more or less 2015 was going to be a treading water year as soon as he took the job. -
Like the 12's say "I'm in"Tequilla said:
Pretty much this ...fivehundredmileDAWG said:Actually I'm fine with Friday ...
ANY Friday in 2015....
Cause ... For 2015 ...
TSIO most likely
There will be some interesting things to look at and watch as the players develop in Year 2 under the Petersen system. It would be nice to see at least one win that comes from left field (Oregon???) where after the game you look at things and shake your head.
But honestly, when you look at the roster, and what is likely to be contributing this year, and then compare to PAC averages, it's hard not to see that Petersen's more or less 2015 was going to be a treading water year as soon as he took the job.
I'm just realistic about it. Win big in 2016 or GTFO. -
Yeah, fuck me for not tuning into Wazzu @ Nevada or watching Wazzu get plungered @ Stanford. I only watched the Thursday night opener to see the Cuogs bow before the mighty Scarlet Knights in front of 12 fans at the Clink.beelzebub said:
Where are all the morons dawging the Cougs about playing on Friday?TierbsHsotBoobs said:But how is Husky Football a high school program?
Too bad u guys r terrible, with all the compelling story lines that would be a Saturday prime time game
Besides, if you can't see how UW being an underdog to a WAC team at Albertson's Lemon Farm is big time football then I can't help you. -
Can't we just go back to playing all the games on Saturday?
-
It will be a woodshed moment for Pete! Boise has the better team,playing the home opener vs Pete will be a big deal in that town.
I see UW limping home from a ass kicking setting the tone for a dismal year... -
I could give you 5 reasons for a butt kicking by the Dawgs. But you probably already know those reasons.devildawg said:It will be a woodshed moment for Pete! Boise has the better team,playing the home opener vs Pete will be a big deal in that town.
I see UW limping home from a ass kicking setting the tone for a dismal year... -
Never too early for cinq raisons, I guess.Tequilla said:...1) Still tremendous uncertainty at the QB position and the desire to make sure that Browning redshirts if at all possible
2) Replacement of large chunks of an average OL ... which while the newbies may be young, hungry, and ready to rumble, they'll probably have a few growing pains during the year. In the long run, this will be a better group but that might be in 2016.
3) Given the issues of 1 and 2 above, even if we were flush with skill position players, we could have offensive challenges. The reality is that we're not flush with much on offense at this point that makes you think of skill position players being anything more than average PAC caliber unless we get a strong breakout season from a true frosh or two - but what's more likely from anybody in that group that plays immediately is being a contributor that positions them into being strong contributors in 2016 forward.
4) Replacement of essentially the entire defensive front ... while I think we have some good pieces there to build upon, they are still young in some areas there and really nobody in that group has been asked to play 60+ snaps in a game before and have the consistency tied into that.
5) Potential best player on defense is Feeney if he can find consistency, but the rest of the LB position will be relatively new and mistakes will happen as this unit grows...
