Fox should hire Brian Williams. Now's the time..
Imagine the ratings? Imagine the dent in liberal reporting and the truths that would emerge? Double Williams salary, it would pay for itself in 1 week.
Comments
-
Faux*
-
That's awesome coming from a fox news fan.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Ultimate way to spit in NBC and cnbc's red eye. Good way to get him to turn on NBC and all their left propoganda and blatant non-reporting of liberal news and overzealous reporting targeting the right. Take Billy O's slot, insert Hannity at 6 and slide Bill to 7:00 .
Imagine the ratings? Imagine the dent in liberal reporting and the truths that would emerge? Double Williams salary, it would pay for itself in 1 week. -
It's funny because retards like you think cable news matters.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Ultimate way to spit in NBC and cnbc's red eye. Good way to get him to turn on NBC and all their left propoganda and blatant non-reporting of liberal news and overzealous reporting targeting the right. Take Billy O's slot, insert Hannity at 6 and slide Bill to 7:00 .
Imagine the ratings? Imagine the dent in liberal reporting and the truths that would emerge? Double Williams salary, it would pay for itself in 1 week. -
And conversely I'd go after Brit Hume if I was NBC. He's the best in the business and basically unemployed at fox. Dont know what happened with ABC. Maybe an ole-timer like passion or Race does. I prefer knowledge be shared among gents, not to rush to Wiki for instant knowledge like the liberal millennials do everytime a a question is posed. Sorry EX, didnt mean to pigeonhole you buddy
-
Yes I would hate wiki if I were you too. Because everything you're masters lie to you about is proven false there.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And conversely I'd go after Brit Hume if I was NBC. He's the best in the business and basically unemployed at fox. Dont know what happened with ABC. Maybe an ole-timer like passion or Race does. I prefer knowledge be shared among gents, not to rush to Wiki for instant knowledge like the liberal millennials do everytime a a question is posed. Sorry EX, didnt mean to pigeonhole you buddy
-
your*2001400ex said:
Yes I would hate wiki if I were you too. Because everything you're masters lie to you about is proven false there.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And conversely I'd go after Brit Hume if I was NBC. He's the best in the business and basically unemployed at fox. Dont know what happened with ABC. Maybe an ole-timer like passion or Race does. I prefer knowledge be shared among gents, not to rush to Wiki for instant knowledge like the liberal millennials do everytime a a question is posed. Sorry EX, didnt mean to pigeonhole you buddy
-
Dawgman should hire Brian Williams.
-
Fucking autocorrect.dnc said:
your*2001400ex said:
Yes I would hate wiki if I were you too. Because everything you're masters lie to you about is proven false there.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And conversely I'd go after Brit Hume if I was NBC. He's the best in the business and basically unemployed at fox. Dont know what happened with ABC. Maybe an ole-timer like passion or Race does. I prefer knowledge be shared among gents, not to rush to Wiki for instant knowledge like the liberal millennials do everytime a a question is posed. Sorry EX, didnt mean to pigeonhole you buddy
-
Only thing worth watching on Fox or any other cable news.ThomasFremont said:
It's funny because retards like you think cable news matters.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Ultimate way to spit in NBC and cnbc's red eye. Good way to get him to turn on NBC and all their left propoganda and blatant non-reporting of liberal news and overzealous reporting targeting the right. Take Billy O's slot, insert Hannity at 6 and slide Bill to 7:00 .
Imagine the ratings? Imagine the dent in liberal reporting and the truths that would emerge? Double Williams salary, it would pay for itself in 1 week.
-
I never really mettle into your little political battles because I really don't care that much, but one thing Honda gets blasted on by the elders is the idea that wikipedia isn't reliable.
It has like a 98% accuracy rate that makes it pretty much the best source online. Yeah anyone can fuck with a topic randomly, but its self regulation is quite brilliant.
Continue slapping each other. -
wikipedia is your source????Doogles said:I never really mettle into your little political battles because I really don't care that much, but one thing Honda gets blasted on by the elders is the idea that wikipedia isn't reliable.
It has like a 98% accuracy rate that makes it pretty much the best source online. Yeah anyone can fuck with a topic randomly, but it's self regulation is quite brilliant.
Continue slapping each other.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipediadnc said:
wikipedia is your source????Doogles said:I never really mettle into your little political battles because I really don't care that much, but one thing Honda gets blasted on by the elders is the idea that wikipedia isn't reliable.
It has like a 98% accuracy rate that makes it pretty much the best source online. Yeah anyone can fuck with a topic randomly, but it's self regulation is quite brilliant.
Continue slapping each other.
yes. -
Now that's funny shit.Doogles said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipediadnc said:
wikipedia is your source????Doogles said:I never really mettle into your little political battles because I really don't care that much, but one thing Honda gets blasted on by the elders is the idea that wikipedia isn't reliable.
It has like a 98% accuracy rate that makes it pretty much the best source online. Yeah anyone can fuck with a topic randomly, but it's self regulation is quite brilliant.
Continue slapping each other.
yes. -
Hate to break it to yaz, but all mainstream news outlets are white house PR teleprompter readers. The only differentiator between them is to what degree.
-
Yeah wiki is actually pretty good. There's links to all the references.Doogles said:I never really mettle into your little political battles because I really don't care that much, but one thing Honda gets blasted on by the elders is the idea that wikipedia isn't reliable.
It has like a 98% accuracy rate that makes it pretty much the best source online. Yeah anyone can fuck with a topic randomly, but its self regulation is quite brilliant.
Continue slapping each other.
I still remember back in the day when the mayor of Charlotte bet Mitch in the morning they would win the NFC championship in 2005. He said he would give Mitch tickets to the UNC/Duke basketball game if the Hawks won. So the mayor wouldn't respond to their calls. A year later or some time, a listener somehow got the mayor on the phone with Mitch to talk about it. He welched on the bet and basically just said he did, not much he can do about it.
So listeners went onto his wiki page and changed it. They posted funny shit like he was a bed wetter and such. It was amazing how quickly it was changed back. For a page of some obscure mayor.
Does that mean everything is 100% perfect? Of course not. But at least I know the sourc and can verify it.
I know, cool story bro.
