Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

KG on Joyner's recruitment

24567

Comments

  • PurpleReign
    PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,480
    edited February 2015
    Kim Grinwald has no dick.

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    bananasnblondes said:

    Even Fatters and Eklund don't agree with Kim on this. Here's what happened:
    1) Joyner commits to Sark as a RB
    2) Sark leaves
    3) Pete honors Joyner's commitment as a RB
    4) Joyner sayshewants to be a CB in college, a position he's never played
    5) Pete says he wants to seeJoyner play CB before he offers him at the position
    6) Pirate tells Joyner he can play any position he wants
    7_) Joyner commits to Pirate
    8) Pete sees Joyner play DB. Offers him at CB
    9) Joyner commits to UW
    10) Kim spends another night crying in his wine glass because he thinks back to Pete kicking him out of his office when he "forgot his jacket
    11) Kim writes another backhanded recruiting remark about Pete
    12)????
    13) Profit run business into ground

    ftfy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    How do any coaches get through recruiting without being as smart as Kim?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    CheersWestDawg said:

    Kim Grinolds has spent more time telling everyone about how Coach Pete screwed up Joyner's recruitment than he ever did criticizing Sark about NOT getting Banner, Garnett, Rector, Brown, etc.

    I hope Pete continues to mock and laugh at Kim during press conferences.

    Those kids had already are up there minds. They were never coming to UW. Totally different scenarios. Stop twisting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    CheersWestDawg said:

    Kim Grinolds has spent more time telling everyone about how Coach Pete screwed up Joyner's recruitment than he ever did criticizing Sark about NOT getting Banner, Garnett, Rector, Brown, etc.

    If you need it sold, call Kim!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    the couch?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • steelheader2
    steelheader2 Member Posts: 373
    The couch or the wine of the week
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    Why would a coach prefer to be honest with players and recruit them for the roles that best suit the needs of the team and that players future prospects? Have they not heard of star rankings? Sizzle?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    Kim refuses to take Sark's cock out of his mouth, defending him to the end. There was another post taking a look at the attrition under Sark and of course the Steve Defense Force aka KG is quick to defend his idol. Good times over at doogman.

    Here's his main arguments:
    -Ty burned UW to the ground which is why the 2012 class was terrible
    -Sark and Pete struck out on the same amount of in-state recruits (Banner, Garnett, Russell, Williams, Browne, Jack, Rector etc vs Eason) cause of math
    -It's not Sark's fault he struck out on those other guys cause they never wanted to go to UW but CP missed on Eason cause his process sucks and he doesn't know what he's doing. Kim needs to school him on how to recruit in the Pac 12.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter