What I'm hearing...
I'm 81% confident in my sources on this information.
Comments
-
We've been right since 2002 and still going strong
-
You would think these cunts would realize this and just die in a fire already.RaceBannon said:We've been right since 2002 and still going strong
-
Kim is obsessed with our message board.
-
UW can thump UCLA later this year in Palo Alto and we would still be right. That said, UCLA should efficiently trounce us which WOULD make us more right.
-
Pretty big misinterpretation of the 0-12 by the staff at doogman. Gee, UW finally plungers a competent team and the negative comments die down. I wonder why?
It was a bad year for doogman, because you guys are fucking retards who have a disaster relaunch, are wrong about 95% of recruiting predictions, make up complete fiction regarding Oregon, create an OL board because the OL is so bad but commenting about that is frowned upon or even deleted, try and create an "elevated discussion" board for Fleenor, treat customers like they are peons, and defend a coach every single time, even though he has fucked up a whole bunch of times the past few years. Kim, your stupidity and arrogance is the reason for your bad year.
-
Wait, who are you?MelloDawg said:UW can thump UCLA later this year in Palo Alto and we would still be right. That said, UCLA should efficiently trounce us which WOULD make us more right.
-
One of these guysDerekJohnson said:
Wait, who are you?MelloDawg said:UW can thump UCLA later this year in Palo Alto and we would still be right. That said, UCLA should efficiently trounce us which WOULD make us more right.
-
Nominated.RoadDawg55 said:Pretty big misinterpretation of the 0-12 by the staff at doogman. Gee, UW finally plungers a competent team and the negative comments die down. I wonder why?
It was a bad year for doogman, because you guys are fucking retards who have a disaster relaunch, are wrong about 95% of recruiting predictions, make up complete fiction regarding Oregon, create an OL board because the OL is so bad but commenting about that is frowned upon or even deleted, try and create an "elevated discussion" board for Fleenor, treat customers like they are peons, and defend a coach every single time, even though he has fucked up a whole bunch of times the past few years. Kim, your stupidity and arrogance is the reason for your bad year.
-
DerekJohnson said:
WTFAY?MelloDawg said:UW can thump UCLA later this year in Palo Alto and we would still be right. That said, UCLA should efficiently trounce us which WOULD make us more right.
-
That thread was Kim claiming victory over the "bitter" and "negative' crowd that plagued dawgman. I guess he forgot to actually look at the threads. Most of the comments over there were people complaining about the stadium, the entrance music, the concessions, etc. The only actual football talk to be had yesterday was on this site.
Also, you all remind Kim of his mother in law, apparently -
In 2007 the Tybots pulled that shit after UW killed Syracuse. We all saw how that turned out.
I wish for once the Doogs would take their own advice and "let it play out".
Did they not learn a damn thing from two years ago 5-1 start?! Fuck! -
When UW gets blown out, Kim is the king of "let it play out", "rebuilds can take a long time." Now, after a blowout win, it's his haha moment, and his fuck you to all the people who doubted Sark. Maybe he should take his own advice and "let it play out." This team still hasn't proven anything. So far, so good, but they need to prove it week in, week out and actually beat some good teams on the road.
-
He was the same guy who claimed if he was right about Oregon he wouldn't be there to beat his chest(even though he was in December).RoadDawg55 said:When UW gets blown out, Kim is the king of "let it play out", "rebuilds can take a long time." Now, after a blowout win, it's his haha moment, and his fuck you to all the people who doubted Sark. Maybe he should take his own advice and "let it play out." This team still hasn't proven anything. So far, so good, but they need to prove it week in, week out and actually beat some good teams on the road.
Huskies are 11-2 previous two years at home. They are 3-10 away from home the last two years with wins over Utah, Colorado and Cal(3-9). Not exactly impressive.
Let's wait until UW defeats Stanford in their house before you tell us "fuck you".
Also read our message board last 48 hours. Pretty fucking positive unlike F3 who was talking shit about Price during one of his better games of his career.
There is no conspiracy here. We don't want Sark to fail just to say we are right, we do want the Huskies to win, and we all enjoyed the win.
Difference is we won't put up with 52-17 losses to an average Arizona team, we aren't going to be like "everything is fine" when it's not and we are in wait and see mode cause this program hasn't given us a decent season since 2001.
As always Doogs and Kim as I know you are all reading this please shut the fuck up and die in a fire already. We are always right and you cunts are always wrong. -
That's an excellent point. When Washington lost to Arizona 52-17, Kim said it was a needed step backward in order to go forward.RoadDawg55 said:When UW gets blown out, Kim is the king of "let it play out", "rebuilds can take a long time." Now, after a blowout win, it's his haha moment, and his fuck you to all the people who doubted Sark. Maybe he should take his own advice and "let it play out." This team still hasn't proven anything. So far, so good, but they need to prove it week in, week out and actually beat some good teams on the road.
-
A-fucking-menHe_Needs_More_Time said:
He was the same guy who claimed if he was right about Oregon he wouldn't be there to beat his chest(even though he was in December).RoadDawg55 said:When UW gets blown out, Kim is the king of "let it play out", "rebuilds can take a long time." Now, after a blowout win, it's his haha moment, and his fuck you to all the people who doubted Sark. Maybe he should take his own advice and "let it play out." This team still hasn't proven anything. So far, so good, but they need to prove it week in, week out and actually beat some good teams on the road.
Huskies are 11-2 previous two years at home. They are 3-10 away from home the last two years with wins over Utah, Colorado and Cal(3-9). Not exactly impressive.
Let's wait until UW defeats Stanford in their house before you tell us "fuck you".
Also read our message board last 48 hours. Pretty fucking positive unlike F3 who was talking shit about Price during one of his better games of his career.
There is no conspiracy here. We don't want Sark to fail just to say we are right, we do want the Huskies to win, and we all enjoyed the win.
Difference is we won't put up with 52-17 losses to an average Arizona team, we aren't going to be like "everything is fine" when it's not and we are in wait and see mode cause this program hasn't given us a decent season since 2001.
As always Doogs and Kim as I know you are all reading this please shut the fuck up and die in a fire already. We are always right and you cunts are always wrong.
-
That's an excellent point. When Washington lost to Arizona 52-17, Kim said it was a needed step backward in order to go forward.
wait what
no way -
wait whatGladstone said:That's an excellent point. When Washington lost to Arizona 52-17, Kim said it was a needed step backward in order to go forward.
no way
It's true that sad sack of shit actually said that.
He accuses us of having an "agenda" yet he's the one with the fucking agenda.
Fuck you Kim! -
Agree.RoadDawg55 said:When UW gets blown out, Kim is the king of "let it play out", "rebuilds can take a long time." Now, after a blowout win, it's his haha moment, and his fuck you to all the people who doubted Sark. Maybe he should take his own advice and "let it play out." This team still hasn't proven anything. So far, so good, but they need to prove it week in, week out and actually beat some good teams on the road.
Look I am as excited as anyone that we finally beat another decent football team up, and that our new offense that we ripped off from a winner looks good in early returns. But Syracuse 2007 is really all anyone needs to remember. This could all be a lucky game mirage.
If we win 4 of 6 from Arizona, ASU, Stanford, Oregon, UCLA and Oregon State, don't get plungered in any losses, plus blast all our patsies, we might actually have something here. Until then, let it play out has never sounded better... -
Nominated.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was the same guy who claimed if he was right about Oregon he wouldn't be there to beat his chest(even though he was in December).RoadDawg55 said:When UW gets blown out, Kim is the king of "let it play out", "rebuilds can take a long time." Now, after a blowout win, it's his haha moment, and his fuck you to all the people who doubted Sark. Maybe he should take his own advice and "let it play out." This team still hasn't proven anything. So far, so good, but they need to prove it week in, week out and actually beat some good teams on the road.
Huskies are 11-2 previous two years at home. They are 3-10 away from home the last two years with wins over Utah, Colorado and Cal(3-9). Not exactly impressive.
Let's wait until UW defeats Stanford in their house before you tell us "fuck you".
Also read our message board last 48 hours. Pretty fucking positive unlike F3 who was talking shit about Price during one of his better games of his career.
There is no conspiracy here. We don't want Sark to fail just to say we are right, we do want the Huskies to win, and we all enjoyed the win.
Difference is we won't put up with 52-17 losses to an average Arizona team, we aren't going to be like "everything is fine" when it's not and we are in wait and see mode cause this program hasn't given us a decent season since 2001.
As always Doogs and Kim as I know you are all reading this please shut the fuck up and die in a fire already. We are always right and you cunts are always wrong.
This.
Agree.
+1.
The worn out "HHBs want Sark to fail so they can be right" is the most overplayed pile of shit ever. There may be an exception here or there, but the vast majority of us are "malcontents" for one reason only - we have fucking sucked at football since we fired Rick, and we voice our displeasure with that. That's it. This isn't complicated shit. If Sark starts winning 10 games a year and we are in the Rose Bowl conversation most years, I will love the fat fuck.
I wouldn't give a fuck if Erin Andrews (two hole, allegedly) was our Coach if we win and win big.
At the same time, I would rather suck off buffalo for a nickle a herd than crown every single swinging dick who lawnmowers on our sidelines as the next great thing, indepedent of the evidence (facts) to the contrary. Show me something first. Sark has failed miserably in that task so far (excluding a game here or there, including Boise State), but I am all for him, or anyone else, who can make UW a winner.
#fleenorsucksballsjustbecause -
Obligatory #HiKimDerekJohnson said:Kim is obsessed with our message board.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
