Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Softy interviewing the CEO
90sDawg
Member Posts: 28
First, the CEO has so much respect for Softy and his journalism prowess that he makes him do the interview in the kitchen - that right there is a big slap in the face to the softmeister....
Then the softmeister decides to show his deep knowledge of college football and recruiting and proceeds to ask the CEO that since he only took 3 OL would he be moving the DL guys over and questioned why he doesn't take 5, 6, 7, or even 8 OL a year. The CEO promptly bitch slaps the softmeister with " I want three a year....because 3 times 5 = 15" clearly knowing that softy can't do that caliber of math.
Complete embarrassment of an interview by sir softmeister and loved the CEO making him look like a fool. No wonder the CEO doesn't do more interviews with the local media.
This after the CEO refusing to answer Grinolds question in the presser...Pete LOVES the local media guys...just loves them.
Then the softmeister decides to show his deep knowledge of college football and recruiting and proceeds to ask the CEO that since he only took 3 OL would he be moving the DL guys over and questioned why he doesn't take 5, 6, 7, or even 8 OL a year. The CEO promptly bitch slaps the softmeister with " I want three a year....because 3 times 5 = 15" clearly knowing that softy can't do that caliber of math.
Complete embarrassment of an interview by sir softmeister and loved the CEO making him look like a fool. No wonder the CEO doesn't do more interviews with the local media.
This after the CEO refusing to answer Grinolds question in the presser...Pete LOVES the local media guys...just loves them.
Comments
-
3 a year sounds low to me. Probably should above 4 a year on average, because that position has lots of attrition and scouting busts.
-
Bumper crop next year
I hear -
he just needs more tim....the UW tagline.
-
It might be a bit low, but not to far off if you are actually doing your due dilligence on guys.BallSacked said:3 a year sounds low to me. Probably should above 4 a year on average, because that position has lots of attrition and scouting busts.
Its definitely way too low for triple chins, he had to account for the washouts from taking a guy he'd never seen play in the final hour. Every year... -
3 a year is fine if he develops them, something Sark could never do.
Sark's O-linemen quit or got hurt or sucked almost 100% of the time. -
#AtoeTop5Pick
-
Kim Grinolds is the only CEO in my book.
-
I agree, that three a year is low. Three a year is perfect unless you use the variable method. Meaning on top of senior guaduates, you have to account for early NFL departures, transfers, and retirements due to injury (which is common among linemen).
-
Three a year is low, but I doubt he plans on holding to that as a hard and fast rule. I'm sure he would have taken four this year if the right guys had pulled the trigger.
I think 18 is a good number. 20+ sounds good to people who are scarred by the Sark method of loading up one year (with 1-2 decent and 5 spot fillers) then taking two years off. I'd rather have 18 decent prospects with an even distribution of eligibility. -
Um, you have to have at least 5 ol a class with Ivan blowing every acl and shoulder in sight
