so... Washington is outrecruiting Whoregon(lol)?
whodathunk Helfrich would fail to capitalize on a Natty appearance?
Comments
-
DPOTD
-
"Scrambling" has briefly overtaken "twisting" as the favorite verb of dawgman. Ektard, Bleenor and several others have been giddy with comparing Helfrich's recruiting to a style of preparing eggs. What they don't mention, however, is that Oregon will almost aduredly have a higher ranked class than UW when all is said and done. (Although that's partially due to long snapper, greyshirt, and unranked Bellingham guy
-
My guess is that there have been random years over the elevencade where UW did have higher ranked classes. Evidence on the field remains elusive
-
If you're comparing the two classes, Oregon may be higher rated on the headline merrics (overall rank and avg rank), but if you had to choose which school has the better OL & QB haul - it looks like UW to me. I always take the QB and OL in the Pac12.bananasnblondes said:"Scrambling" has briefly overtaken "twisting" as the favorite verb of dawgman. Ektard, Bleenor and several others have been giddy with comparing Helfrich's recruiting to a style of preparing eggs. What they don't mention, however, is that Oregon will almost aduredly have a higher ranked class than UW when all is said and done. (Although that's partially due to long snapper, greyshirt, and unranked Bellingham guy
-
It really doesn't mean anything until 3 years or so when the real results come through. Yes I know there is a correlation between avg. star ranking and success on the field but it's important to not get carried away.
In a similar vein, I just heard from a friend about two relatively new hires that were recently fired from his Investment banking group. Both were 5 star recruits (1 was a Harvard MBA, 1 was another Ivy League MBA) but neither had the drive because they thought they had already arrived with their newly minted MBA's and prestigious undergrad degrees. -
Should've gotten a TCU MBA instead.HFNY said:It really doesn't mean anything until 3 years or so when the real results come through. Yes I know there is a correlation between avg. star ranking and success on the field but it's important to not get carried away.
In a similar vein, I just heard from a friend about two relatively new hires that were recently fired from his Investment banking group. Both were 5 star recruits (1 was a Harvard MBA, 1 was another Ivy League MBA) but neither had the drive because they thought they had already arrived with their newly minted MBA's and prestigious undergrad degrees. -
Scrappy 2 and 3 stars out of TCU always bring it onwhatshouldicareabout said:
Should've gotten a TCU MBA instead.HFNY said:It really doesn't mean anything until 3 years or so when the real results come through. Yes I know there is a correlation between avg. star ranking and success on the field but it's important to not get carried away.
In a similar vein, I just heard from a friend about two relatively new hires that were recently fired from his Investment banking group. Both were 5 star recruits (1 was a Harvard MBA, 1 was another Ivy League MBA) but neither had the drive because they thought they had already arrived with their newly minted MBA's and prestigious undergrad degrees.gamedaythe market open. -
If I'm Blankfein out recruiting for Goldman Sachs, give me the TCU MBA guy with feces in his throat 7'days a week and twice on Sunday.HFNY said:It really doesn't mean anything until 3 years or so when the real results come through. Yes I know there is a correlation between avg. star ranking and success on the field but it's important to not get carried away.
In a similar vein, I just heard from a friend about two relatively new hires that were recently fired from his Investment banking group. Both were 5 star recruits (1 was a Harvard MBA, 1 was another Ivy League MBA) but neither had the drive because they thought they had already arrived with their newly minted MBA's and prestigious undergrad degrees.
Cook it.
-
Vernon Adams >>>>> any HS QBBallSacked said:
If you're comparing the two classes, Oregon may be higher rated on the headline merrics (overall rank and avg rank), but if you had to choose which school has the better OL & QB haul - it looks like UW to me. I always take the QB and OL in the Pac12.bananasnblondes said:"Scrambling" has briefly overtaken "twisting" as the favorite verb of dawgman. Ektard, Bleenor and several others have been giddy with comparing Helfrich's recruiting to a style of preparing eggs. What they don't mention, however, is that Oregon will almost aduredly have a higher ranked class than UW when all is said and done. (Although that's partially due to long snapper, greyshirt, and unranked Bellingham guy
-
wdwhaAZDuck said:
Vernon Adams >>>>> any HS QBBallSacked said:
If you're comparing the two classes, Oregon may be higher rated on the headline merrics (overall rank and avg rank), but if you had to choose which school has the better OL & QB haul - it looks like UW to me. I always take the QB and OL in the Pac12.bananasnblondes said:"Scrambling" has briefly overtaken "twisting" as the favorite verb of dawgman. Ektard, Bleenor and several others have been giddy with comparing Helfrich's recruiting to a style of preparing eggs. What they don't mention, however, is that Oregon will almost aduredly have a higher ranked class than UW when all is said and done. (Although that's partially due to long snapper, greyshirt, and unranked Bellingham guy
