Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pick your early Sark 3 game losing streak

2

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,270
    He didn't even have a 2 game slide this year ... so thinking he'll have a 3 game slide next year is probably wishful thinking.

    That being said, those thinking that SC is a runaway winner for the conference are FS given the losses that they have on the Front 7 as well as replacing most of their WR and RB production for this year.

    My guess is that Seven will lose at least 2 games out of this bunch: Stanford, @ASU, @Notre Dame, @Oregon, UCLA.

    UCLA is the one team that nobody is talking about because of Hundley leaving. But if they can find a way to get a graduate QB transfer in the fold (i.e. Braxton Miller), they have 18 returning starters. Even if they have to turn everything over to Slick's kid or even a true frosh, there will be a lot of support surrounding an average starter at QB. By the time UCLA plays USC, whoever it is playing QB for UCLA will have plenty of experience.
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited January 2015
    Tequilla said:

    He didn't even have a 2 game slide this year ... so thinking he'll have a 3 game slide next year is probably wishful thinking.

    That being said, those thinking that SC is a runaway winner for the conference are FS given the losses that they have on the Front 7 as well as replacing most of their WR and RB production for this year.

    My guess is that Seven will lose at least 2 games out of this bunch: Stanford, @ASU, @Notre Dame, @Oregon, UCLA.

    UCLA is the one team that nobody is talking about because of Hundley leaving. But if they can find a way to get a graduate QB transfer in the fold (i.e. Braxton Miller), they have 18 returning starters. Even if they have to turn everything over to Slick's kid or even a true frosh, there will be a lot of support surrounding an average starter at QB. By the time UCLA plays USC, whoever it is playing QB for UCLA will have plenty of experience.

    Josh Rosen will be QB for UCLA. He's a true frosh, but Rated #1 in the country. Biggins has said he's the best QB he's seen come out of SoCal in 10+years. He's already enrolled (like Browning).

    They return 18 starters, miss Ore/UW, and have their weakest non-Conf schedule in years. So how quickly Rosen acclimates will be the difference between a Sun Bowl type year or a Rose Bowl type year

    I'm optimistic, but admittedly the history on true Frosh succeeding is thin at best.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,270
    The start of UCLA's season isn't easy, but also isn't daunting, particularly not the OOC schedule.

    One of the things a lot of people are missing in crowning SC is that they get Washington and Oregon on their schedule this year while UCLA gets the Cougs and Beavers. While I don't expect Washington to win the game at SC, it's certainly a more difficult game for SC in comparison.

    SC probably goes 1-1 against the NW schools while UCLA should cruise rather easily to 2-0 against the same part of the schedule. The remaining 7 games are against common opponents.

    Personally, I'd back UCLA to finish higher in the South next year than USC.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    AZDuck said:

    If Mora develops Rosen half as well as he developed Hundley... UCLA is fucked

    Are you telling me the Mazzone clan sucks at coaching?
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468

    AZDuck said:

    If Mora develops Rosen half as well as he developed Hundley... UCLA is fucked

    Are you telling me the Mazzone clan sucks at coaching?
    image

    Your eyes are as good as mine.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,242 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    If Mora develops Rosen half as well as he developed Hundley... UCLA is fucked

    To be fair I think Hundley had Jack Lockner brains
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited January 2015
    AZDuck said:

    If Mora develops Rosen half as well as he developed Hundley... UCLA is fucked

    I know it's popular bashing Hundley, but he ended up being a pretty damn good college QB.

    69% completion rate, 22 td's to 5 ints, 8 yards per attempt, and that's before you add in his running ability. His adjusted QBR is 78.6 which is very good.

    If Rosen turns into that, UCLA should be just fine.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    AZDuck said:

    If Mora develops Rosen half as well as he developed Hundley... UCLA is fucked

    To be fair I think Hundley had Jack Lockner brains
    Disagree.

    Hundley brains >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lockner brains
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,604 Swaye's Wigwam

    Tequilla said:

    He didn't even have a 2 game slide this year ... so thinking he'll have a 3 game slide next year is probably wishful thinking.

    That being said, those thinking that SC is a runaway winner for the conference are FS given the losses that they have on the Front 7 as well as replacing most of their WR and RB production for this year.

    My guess is that Seven will lose at least 2 games out of this bunch: Stanford, @ASU, @Notre Dame, @Oregon, UCLA.

    UCLA is the one team that nobody is talking about because of Hundley leaving. But if they can find a way to get a graduate QB transfer in the fold (i.e. Braxton Miller), they have 18 returning starters. Even if they have to turn everything over to Slick's kid or even a true frosh, there will be a lot of support surrounding an average starter at QB. By the time UCLA plays USC, whoever it is playing QB for UCLA will have plenty of experience.

    Josh Rosen will be QB for UCLA. He's a true frosh, but Rated #1 in the country. Biggins has said he's the best QB he's seen come out of SoCal in 10+years. He's already enrolled (like Browning).

    They return 18 starters, miss Ore/UW, and have their weakest non-Conf schedule in years. So how quickly Rosen acclimates will be the difference between a Sun Bowl type year or a Rose Bowl type year

    I'm optimistic, but admittedly the history on true Frosh succeeding is thin at best.
    I like UCLA's team a lot, but I have a couple issues. QB is the obvious one. The other is the defense. For the talent at hand, Mora's defenses have sucked. There was a stretch mid season where your defense was a total dreckfest. What changes are being made on that side of the ball? Something isn't working. After three seasons, I think what you have seen on that side, is how it is always going to be.

    If your defense played at a higher level, you might survive having a freshman QB. I don't think Mora and Ulbrich are capable of making that happen.