Kim's vagina is extra sandy today
-Begins with the usual "Pete blew the program up and burnt all the bridges"
-This team had great talent, just didn't fit what Pete wanted to run
-Plenty of QB talent on the team, just didn't fit Pete's system
-Sark left behind lots of talent on the O Line, Strausser just couldn't get them to play together
-Sark did a great job of recruiting DB's. Injury and attrition left them in a bad spot
-The program took a major step back from where Sark left it. Hopefully Pete learns from his mistakes
-The whole idea that Sark's players were undisciplined and didn't have a winning culture is cliche and gobbledygook
-Sick of people with their "heads in the sand" that constantly defend Petersen and/or put blame on Sark for this year's team
and the kicker...
-Years in the real estate business taught him how unreasonable people are when presented with facts.
-He also freaked out when someone called him a website geek and not an expert on football analysis
Comments
-
Kim's gonna Kim
Whater is whet
-
biggusdickuslamp.gif
-
I approve, even though Kim doesn't have supple thighs.
-
Free pub1!PuffyLittleGinage said:I approve, even though Kim doesn't have supple thighs.
-
He could have just saved himself all the time and just typed:
"Pete doesn't let me blow him like Sark did so I hate him." -
Apparently Pete's system requires QB's that can actually play the position.
-
Sark left plenty of OL talent with career ending injuries.
-
Say anything about Fat Fuck Sark (redundant) asking the talent to leave?!
-
Kim's poast is just full of fail.
Plenty of QB talent but didn't fit Pete's system? Jesus....what the fuck did Kim watch all year? Cyler can't throw a god damn bubble screen to save his life. It's so fucking slow and weak. Are Pete's bubble screens just WAY TOO different from Sark's bubble screens? Bullshit.
Sark's OL talent vs. Strausser's ability to coach. This is more of Kim's bullshit narrative. Sark OL recruiting while at UW was a fucking disaster and anyone with two brain cells that can recollect the last 5 years can remember that. Kim has obviously had too many Cabs that drink like Merlots. Take a look at Strausser's bio and put it up against Dan fucking Cozzetto's. I'll take Strausser any day of the week over the angry cocksucker from Arizona State.
Sark's players WERE and ARE undisciplined. Our teams and USC are comedic when it comes to penalties. Any idiot (except failed real estate midgets) can see that.
I could go on and on with this post but I have hookers to fuck and coke to snort. The short of it is that no one EVER saw a post like this from Kim when it came to Sark's teams. It was always repeating the narrative that Sark fed the media. Kim just took an extra helping of it along with the after dinner BJ for Sark. -
Kim Jong Vino is a fucktarded idiot ... enough said about that
-
Where is biggus when you need him? I would really like to see this reply to being called a website geek. And did he get a warning? Or just gone?bananasnblondes said:Some highlights:
-Begins with the usual "Pete blew the program up and burnt all the bridges"
-This team had great talent, just didn't fit what Pete wanted to run
-Plenty of QB talent on the team, just didn't fit Pete's system
-Sark left behind lots of talent on the O Line, Strausser just couldn't get them to play together
-Sark did a great job of recruiting DB's. Injury and attrition left them in a bad spot
-The program took a major step back from where Sark left it. Hopefully Pete learns from his mistakes
-The whole idea that Sark's players were undisciplined and didn't have a winning culture is cliche and gobbledygook
-Sick of people with their "heads in the sand" that constantly defend Petersen and/or put blame on Sark for this year's team
and the kicker...
-Years in the real estate business taught him how unreasonable people are when presented with facts.
-He also freaked out when someone called him a website geek and not an expert on football analysis -
I like to believe Sark would have done better than Peterman when he finished with essentially the same record with much superior talent.
That's what I like to do. -
Good to know you still pay Kim. Free Link?bananasnblondes said:Some highlights:
-Begins with the usual "Pete blew the program up and burnt all the bridges"
-This team had great talent, just didn't fit what Pete wanted to run
-Plenty of QB talent on the team, just didn't fit Pete's system
-Sark left behind lots of talent on the O Line, Strausser just couldn't get them to play together
-Sark did a great job of recruiting DB's. Injury and attrition left them in a bad spot
-The program took a major step back from where Sark left it. Hopefully Pete learns from his mistakes
-The whole idea that Sark's players were undisciplined and didn't have a winning culture is cliche and gobbledygook
-Sick of people with their "heads in the sand" that constantly defend Petersen and/or put blame on Sark for this year's team
and the kicker...
-Years in the real estate business taught him how unreasonable people are when presented with facts.
-He also freaked out when someone called him a website geek and not an expert on football analysis -
This year was a disaster. But anyone with half a brain knows sark sucks as a coach.
The weakest links in the secondary this year were sark recruits. Just sayin.
The offensive line has been a disaster since sark was here. I was actually pleasantly surprised with our pass pro this year. Run blocking was the same as it ever was. -
You made a point or two but our pass blocking wasnt good, nor was our run blocking. We had injuries and shuffling . In 2-3 years we will have a OL worth being proud of no thanks to sark. Same with EVERY fucking position on the field. We will be good when all Petes players compliment the few seniors Sark left over.AtomicDawg said:This year was a disaster. But anyone with half a brain knows sark sucks as a coach.
The weakest links in the secondary this year were sark recruits. Just sayin.
The offensive line has been a disaster since sark was here. I was actually pleasantly surprised with our pass pro this year. Run blocking was the same as it ever was. -
I don't have the stats but it sure as hell seemed like we took a lot less sacks. Our tailbacks sure as hell were worthless in pass blocking this year. We had a lot less clips and chop blocks as well.
-
The tailbacks were probably letting guys by hoping Miley would get a case of Dixon's KneeAtomicDawg said:I don't have the stats but it sure as hell seemed like we took a lot less sacks. Our tailbacks sure as hell were worthless in pass blocking this year. We had a lot less clips and chop blocks as well.
-
I tried to give a fuck what Kim thinks.
No I didn't. -
NFL running backs that power through shitty blocking leave and the O line suddenly sucks. Go figure.
-
We joke, but there's a good chance Kim was hoping for this outcome so he could give the diatribe above. 8-6 sucks and it's just what he wanted to further his agenda
-
The oline sucked before too. Hth. The Stanford game at the clink was the worst oline play in the history of football. People that thought they were good had an agenda.section8 said:NFL running backs that power through shitty blocking leave and the O line suddenly sucks. Go figure.
-
If I ever run into that little homo I am going to pretend like he hit me and then proceed to kick his ass. For pretend.
-
PuffyLittleGinage said:
I approve, even though Kim doesn't have supple thighs.
-
Theyre at teamrankings.comAtomicDawg said:I don't have the stats but it sure as hell seemed like we took a lot less sacks. Our tailbacks sure as hell were worthless in pass blocking this year. We had a lot less clips and chop blocks as well.
On a percentage basis it was slightly less (6.9% vs 7.2%), on a sacks per game it was 2.2 vs 2.5. UW was around the median nationally in sacks allowed this year
Yards per rush was 4.2 down from 4.9. That was slightly less than the median nationally and 7th in pac12.
So about average in both. HTH.
-
So let me get this straight - kim bitches about Petermen not granting doogman.com enough access.
Then within one year he has established himself as the biggest Petermen critic in western Washington, with consistent subtle jabs and occasional straight-out attacks.
Well, that is certainly a good strategy for gaining better access. Keep diggin' that hole kimmy. -
When you have a new, hard-ass regime taking over for an undisciplined fuck, you have to blow up everything and start over. That's coaching 101. If Petermen made a mistake, it was not kicking more of Sark's guys who didn't buy in off the team. See Chuck Strong at Texas--they had an awful year, but in 2 years when they go 11-1 people will look back and realize that it was worth it. One step back, two steps forward. I wouldn't call this year a failure by Petermen at all. He was left a bunch of talented, but undisciplined and soft (with a few exceptions), players from Sark. Cycle those bad eggs out of the program, get Petermen's guys in there, and in 2 years UW will be at 9/10 wins.
