Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The BCS didn't make the SEC great

2

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

    They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

    Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

    As we've always said, coaching matters.

    Yes it did, along with ESPN and the brainwashed voters. Pull your fucking head out your cunt boob.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

    They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

    Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

    As we've always said, coaching matters.

    Yes it did, along with ESPN and the brainwashed voters. Pull your fucking head out your cunt boob.
    The SEC only played in and won one of the first five BCS titles and had an undefeated team left out in 2004.

    The system didn't have a bias to the SEC. It had a bias in favor of great coaching.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

    I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter

    Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

    I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.
    You have proven that you also hate facts.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

    I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.
    You have proven that you also hate facts.
    Disagree. I like conference standings a lot more than trusting a shit eye test that picks a team who has beaten one ranked team this season.

    For some reason, I think seven conference wins is better than five. Sark was a huge fan of 5-4 seasons though.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2015

    Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

    I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.
    You have proven that you also hate facts.
    Disagree. I like conference standings a lot more than trusting a shit eye test that picks a team who has beaten one ranked team this season.

    For some reason, I think seven conference wins is better than five. Sark was a huge fan of 5-4 seasons though.
    Says the guy who now resorts to Sagarian to say 2-6 Arkansas is better than 11 of 12 PAC 12 teams.

    Sagarian overrated the SEC like everyone else. They didn't beat one top 10 team out of conference or bowl seasons. When UCLA beats Kansas State, maybe not even a top 20.

    ASU will finish ahead of Arizona. With a win, UCLA will too. Those are facts. USC and Utah have outside chances as well.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,551 Founders Club
    I like Kansas State in this one
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

    I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.
    You have proven that you also hate facts.
    Disagree. I like conference standings a lot more than trusting a shit eye test that picks a team who has beaten one ranked team this season.

    For some reason, I think seven conference wins is better than five. Sark was a huge fan of 5-4 seasons though.
    Says the guy who now resorts to Sagarian to say 2-6 Arkansas is better than 11 of 12 PAC 12 teams.

    Sagarian overrated the SEC like everyone else. They didn't beat one top 10 team out of conference or bowl seasons. When UCLA beats Kansas State, maybe not even a top 20.
    That was sarcasm. Keep up. I do think Arkansas could beat 11 out of 12 though, but we'll never know because Larry Scott Fucking Stupid can't put together a bowl game against the SEC.

    Sagarin tends to dramatically overrate some conferences every year and his system clearly overrates the SEC and the Pac-12 South this year.

    Then again, who do you rate when every conference sucks?
  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    edited January 2015
    And this guy in October