Big surprise PSA coming?
Comments
-
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are.
-
^
Recruiter insider superiority guy. -
Sweatpants boners are the bestest!fivehundredmileDAWG said:Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
Thanks for reading -
Awesomed for the Armenian semen drying on Kim's lower lip.fivehundredmileDAWG said:Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
Thanks for reading
BRB, JO. -
WOOF! WOOF!!!
-
Not sure what permutations are, but I upvoted you anyway.Dennis_DeYoung said:
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are. -
No one knows what it means, but it's provocative!Swaye said:
Not sure what permutations are, but I upvoted you anyway.Dennis_DeYoung said:
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
No one knows what it means, but it's provocative!Swaye said:
Not sure what permutations are, but I upvoted you anyway.Dennis_DeYoung said:
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are.
-
Premature ejaculation is not pretty.HUSKYFANATIC said:WOOF! WOOF!!!
-
That all depends were it lands!HuskyInAZ said:
