Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

But how is the Pac-12 a bad basketball conference?

Comments

  • BayDawg
    BayDawg Member Posts: 1,623
    It might be our saving grace. There is some shitty basketball going on right now in this conference.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    BayDawg said:

    It might be our saving grace. There is some shitty basketball going on right now in this conference.

    Sincerely, the 2011-2012 Huskies
  • BayDawg
    BayDawg Member Posts: 1,623

    BayDawg said:

    It might be our saving grace. There is some shitty basketball going on right now in this conference.

    Sincerely, the 2011-2012 Huskies
    I hear you, but that team didnt have any OOC wins at all to lean on. If we win 11 or 12 conference games this year we will be in because of it.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,353 Founders Club
    Looks like the commoners out here are spending a lot of energy teeing off on Romar. It might be time for us to create a higher level of discussion board for Husky Basketball.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    edited December 2014
    BayDawg said:

    BayDawg said:

    It might be our saving grace. There is some shitty basketball going on right now in this conference.

    Sincerely, the 2011-2012 Huskies
    I hear you, but that team didnt have any OOC wins at all to lean on. If we win 11 or 12 conference games this year we will be in because of it.
    OOC doesn't matter. You win the Pac12, you go to the tournament, guaranfuckinteed.

    Sincerely, spadoFS
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    BayDawg said:

    BayDawg said:

    It might be our saving grace. There is some shitty basketball going on right now in this conference.

    Sincerely, the 2011-2012 Huskies
    I hear you, but that team didnt have any OOC wins at all to lean on. If we win 11 or 12 conference games this year we will be in because of it.
    UW has 11 of 18 conference games against teams with RPI worse than 90. 11-7 = bubble
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Pac-12 power rankings
    Good
    1. Arizona
    Slightly above average
    2. Utah (that squeak job vs Wichita doesn't look so great anymore)
    3. Washington
    Mediocre at best
    4. Stanford
    5. cal
    fucking dreckfest
    6. Oregon
    7. Colorado
    8. Arizona state
    Belongs in the big west
    9. Oregon state
    10. UCLA
    Belongs in the big sky
    11. USC
    12. WSU

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dhdawg said:

    Pac-12 power rankings
    Good
    1. Arizona
    Slightly above average
    2. Utah (that squeak job vs Wichita doesn't look so great anymore)
    3. Washington
    Mediocre at best
    4. Stanford
    5. cal
    fucking dreckfest
    6. Oregon
    7. Colorado
    8. Arizona state
    Belongs in the big west
    9. Oregon state
    10. UCLA
    Belongs in the big sky
    11. USC
    12. WSU

    Other than CAL IS WAY TOO DAMN HIGH, this is a great list.
  • SevenEleven
    SevenEleven Member Posts: 318
    Swap cal and oregon and move uw down to mediocre at best
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    dhdawg said:

    Pac-12 power rankings
    Good
    1. Arizona
    Slightly above average
    2. Utah (that squeak job vs Wichita doesn't look so great anymore)
    3. Washington
    Mediocre at best
    4. Stanford
    5. cal
    fucking dreckfest
    6. Oregon
    7. Colorado
    8. Arizona state
    Belongs in the big west
    9. Oregon state
    10. UCLA
    Belongs in the big sky
    11. USC
    12. WSU

    Arizona is way better than slightly above average. I might agree that they parts are greater than the sum, but they have one of the most talented teams in the country.

    Their C and PF are multi year starters. Stanley Johnson is one of the best freshman in the country. Hollis Jefferson is really good. Johnson and Hollis Jefferson are certain first rounders. Johnson will be top 10. Ashley might be a first rounder too. York is pretty good too. McConnell is an over valued white, pure PG. Pundits will always jo over those guys, but he's their weakest link.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited December 2014
    I put them in the good category. They aren't a great team, but they're good. Top 10 team, but not in Duke or UK's class
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    edited December 2014
    dhdawg said:

    I put them in the good category. They aren't a great team, but they're good. Top 10 team, but not in Duke or UK's class

    Zona is in dukes class, and even in UK's class when you consider playing the d2d game. On paper, UK is obviously better than everyone.

    Basketball is funny in the sense that you can have good and bad shooting nights which will separate a team. UK is the only team in the nation which is hands down more talented than anyone, but other than that I'd put zona vs anyone on a neutral court
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    dhdawg said:

    I put them in the good category. They aren't a great team, but they're good. Top 10 team, but not in Duke or UK's class

    Top 10 is a lot better than above average. 25-40 is above average. Kentucky is the only dominant team. Duke is good, they pretty much always are. Okafor is really skilled and polished, but isn't a great athlete. Their only really impressive win is Wisconsin. UConn and Michigan State are down this year.
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223

    dhdawg said:

    I put them in the good category. They aren't a great team, but they're good. Top 10 team, but not in Duke or UK's class

    Top 10 is a lot better than above average. 25-40 is above average. Kentucky is the only dominant team. Duke is good, they pretty much always are. Okafor is really skilled and polished, but isn't a great athlete. Their only really impressive win is Wisconsin. UConn and Michigan State are down this year.
    Duke is doing it's usual. play itself into a 2 seed where they will lose in round 1 and we have to hear about all the horrendous choking articles for the 7th time in 10 years.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited December 2014

    dhdawg said:

    I put them in the good category. They aren't a great team, but they're good. Top 10 team, but not in Duke or UK's class

    Top 10 is a lot better than above average. 25-40 is above average. Kentucky is the only dominant team. Duke is good, they pretty much always are. Okafor is really skilled and polished, but isn't a great athlete. Their only really impressive win is Wisconsin. UConn and Michigan State are down this year.
    They were in the good tier, Utah and UW are slightly above average
  • SevenEleven
    SevenEleven Member Posts: 318
    After stony brook, UW does not get to be in Utah'a tier