USC

TommySQC said:

Should be Final Four next year.

Amazing 8 wins for the depth.

Did they forget they have Sark?

This has got to be a whoosh

BallSacked said:

That early four game stretch of Stanford @ASU UW @ND could derail their season. Like Kiffin's 2012 'unfinished business year'. I see 2-2 there.

Then closing @Oregon UCLA is tough. Sark teams usually get worse as the season goes along and those are probably their two most difficult opponents.

I agree with you that the 4 game stretch from Stanford to Notre Dame has a really good shot at 2-2. Without dooging it up a lot, one of the positives that I saw out of the last 3 UW games this year was a team that played hard and with the exception of Cyler being fucktarded a few times at Arizona, we really weren't putting ourselves in position to make a lot of mistakes (particularly so on defense). Well coached teams that don't hurt themselves will always have a good opportunity to beat Seven coached teams.

We don't know enough about Oregon next year to make a ton of claims about them, but I'm not going to pick Seven to win in Eugene until he does.

I don't know what to think of UCLA yet for next year - how they build up the QB play will be a major question.

I wouldn't sleep on Arizona or even the game at Colorado - although Sark tends to beat up on teams that they have more talent than. That being said, I could see Colorado making another small jump next year.

Besides Arkansas St and Idaho, I could see Sark losing any of those games.

RaceBannon said:

The higher the expectations the better. Sark loves the pub but has no idea how to bring it to pass.

Not my fault kids these days can't execute