Big surprise PSA coming?
Comments
-
Axe the LPT. I hear they're really dialed in.
-
huh?
-
I see you were just posting in a similar thread on dawgman.
-
Don't tease! Spill it.
-
There's nothing. This guy was posting in a thread on dawgman where someone asked if there would be any surprise commits/visitors that come out of the blue. Nobody had anything except "it would be nice if Throckmorton flipped or that guy from Kyler Manu's school that's committed to ND.
Either way, both of those guys are O Linemen and Scott Eklund has made it very clear that Petersen is done recruiting O linemen and is no longer pursuing any, nor would he take commits from any.
Oh wait. -
It's a rumor from the wonderful witch of Spovegas or wherever she lives... anyway, she's usually accurate, so I have a boner. Fuck everyone.
-
Don't worry @HUSKYFANATIC, I'm working on a big story. Lots of exciting stuff happening. Stay tuned, it's gonna get interesting!
<--
"UW fanbase is the SEC of the West" Demario Richard.. -
I love when Ektard makes definite statements like this, as if he and Peterman had a conversation and was told they won't take any more linemen. If anything, it's a guess but to say shit like he does is FS.bananasnblondes said:There's nothing. This guy was posting in a thread on dawgman where someone asked if there would be any surprise commits/visitors that come out of the blue. Nobody had anything except "it would be nice if Throckmorton flipped or that guy from Kyler Manu's school that's committed to ND.
Either way, both of those guys are O Linemen and Scott Eklund has made it very clear that Petersen is done recruiting O linemen and is no longer pursuing any, nor would he take commits from any.
Oh wait.
-
Well, at least in ektards case this time he can claim he was right b/c peterman doesn't really mince words often. If he wanted a certain number of guys and they got commitments, then it doesn't take much to realize he's done.DugtheDoog said:
I love when Ektard makes definite statements like this, as if he and Peterman had a conversation and was told they won't take any more linemen. If anything, it's a guess but to say shit like he does is FS.bananasnblondes said:There's nothing. This guy was posting in a thread on dawgman where someone asked if there would be any surprise commits/visitors that come out of the blue. Nobody had anything except "it would be nice if Throckmorton flipped or that guy from Kyler Manu's school that's committed to ND.
Either way, both of those guys are O Linemen and Scott Eklund has made it very clear that Petersen is done recruiting O linemen and is no longer pursuing any, nor would he take commits from any.
Oh wait.
It's funny how definitive these statements are though. If a guy fell into petersons lap tomorrow, it's not like he's sark and wouldn't take more beef. -
Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
Thanks for reading -
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are.
-
^
Recruiter insider superiority guy. -
Sweatpants boners are the bestest!fivehundredmileDAWG said:Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
Thanks for reading -
Awesomed for the Armenian semen drying on Kim's lower lip.fivehundredmileDAWG said:Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
Thanks for reading
BRB, JO. -
WOOF! WOOF!!!
-
Not sure what permutations are, but I upvoted you anyway.Dennis_DeYoung said:
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are. -
No one knows what it means, but it's provocative!Swaye said:
Not sure what permutations are, but I upvoted you anyway.Dennis_DeYoung said:
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
No one knows what it means, but it's provocative!Swaye said:
Not sure what permutations are, but I upvoted you anyway.Dennis_DeYoung said:
1. TRUE - Obviously player development matters. The whole fucking debate is fucktarded. It's like a chef. Good ingredients, good kitchen, good chef = good results. Do the permutations.fivehundredmileDAWG said:1. Player development is king. Some players have a higher ceiling than others, I'll bet that Petersens ability to get a player to his apex is stronger than Sarks. See Kikaha, Shelton,Hudson etc for example.
No one really knows anything ... Sure when Sark was here Fleenor could call Peter Sirmon and get some inkling ... But Kim and Ektard were ROUTINELY wrong ... Say 81% of the time.
2. In the end speculating about who will verbally committ... Then sign the a scholly commitment ... Then actually show up and be an actual contributor is anybody's guess.
All I know for sure is Ektard is dumb and Kim is an arrogant wine connoisseur wannabe who wants everyone to think he gets tons of pussy when there is actually Armenian semen drying on his lower lip.
3. In reality I don't think anyone has reliable inside info. I'm glad Huskyfanatic is here and hopefully the boner in his sweats will grow.
4. Thanks for reading
2. FALSE - Uh, is it really a 'guessing game' to predict that Myles Gaskin will sign with Washington? Was it hard to predict that Jusstissssss Warren was going to commit to UW? Is it hard to understand that Austin Joyner will come to Washington? No.
3. FALSE - There are people with good info, they just usually post on Ruth's site (seriously).
4. YOU'RE WELCOME - you really are.
-
Premature ejaculation is not pretty.HUSKYFANATIC said:WOOF! WOOF!!!
-
That all depends were it lands!HuskyInAZ said:
