Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why Boise st losing starters doesn't really matter

dhdawg
dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
edited August 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
Looking through their depth chart their starters go like this
QB: RS SR
RB: RS JR
WR: they have experience but it doesn't really matter at WR
TE: RS SR
LT: RS SR
LG: RS SR
C: RS SR
RG: RS SO
RT: RS SO
DE: RS JR (their best player btw)
DT: RS SR
DT: JR
Stud end: RS SR
LB:
SAM: RS SR
MLB: JR
WILL: SO
CB: RS-JR
CB: SO
Rover: RS JR
FS RS SO
they are not losing anything, they are not young, they may even be a better football team
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,573 Founders Club
    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RaceBannon said:

    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

    You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

    Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

    Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

    You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

    Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

    Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.
    Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

    End of discussion.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tracker
    tracker Member Posts: 866
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

    You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

    Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

    Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.
    Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

    End of discussion.
    In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

    Fuck.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    tracker said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

    You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

    Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

    Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.
    Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

    End of discussion.
    In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

    Fuck.

    Coaching matters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,678 Swaye's Wigwam
    tracker said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

    You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

    Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

    Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.
    Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

    End of discussion.
    In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

    Fuck.

    Because Willingham was here 6 years ago and incoming true freshmen are still affected by that. You don't know the damage he did. One kid even said that he sucked the fun out of the game for him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

    You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

    Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

    Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.
    go ahead and add altitude to that list. Doogs use that one a lot as well
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,649 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited August 2013
    Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDoogShit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDawgShit

    You misspelled Doog there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,649 Swaye's Wigwam
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDawgShit

    You misspelled Doog there.
    Thanks. You inspired me to go and correct it.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter