Why Boise st losing starters doesn't really matter

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

End of discussion.

In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

Fuck.

tracker said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

End of discussion.

In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

Fuck.

Because Willingham was here 6 years ago and incoming true freshmen are still affected by that. You don't know the damage he did. One kid even said that he sucked the fun out of the game for him.

Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDoogShit

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDawgShit

You misspelled Doog there.

Thanks. You inspired me to go and correct it.

CaptainPJ said:

blockquote>
go ahead and add altitude to that list. Doogs use that one a lot as well

Staff, TRUE?!!!

There is no staff. HTH.

Certain positions like RB/WR/K/P are fine with a younger players. OL and and defense is where you NEED experience while feeding the younger players into the games slowly and at smart times. So when those guys are gone the players who were young are now RS SO/Jr./Sr. and replacing them.

Of course you will always have some studs who defy these normal circumstances (Shaq Thompson) or you just do a super shitty job at recruitng and one of your positions are so incredibly thin you are forced to use the younger players (Sark's OL last year).

IrishDawg22 said:

CuntWaffle said:

Certain positions like RB/WR/K/P are fine with a younger players. OL and and defense is where you NEED experience while feeding the younger players into the games slowly and at smart times. So when those guys are gone the players who were young are now RS SO/Jr./Sr. and replacing them.

Of course you will always have some studs who defy these normal circumstances (Shaq Thompson) or you just do a super shitty job at recruitng and one of your positions are so incredibly thin you are forced to use the younger players (Sark's OL last year).

Am I getting Whooshed or did you just make a post that made sense?

Neither. You are just terrible at the Internet.

HTH.