Chico commits
Comments
-
I kinda like the gloating
-
Great news.
Good job Peterson and Co.
Would've been interesting to see how Sark would've fucked this one up. -
Grinhole: "Coach Pete can't recruit 4-star talent."
-
Midgets dude. Hope he proves me wrong and pops off.
-
You mean like the Budda Baker recruitment? ;-)BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Great news.
Good job Peterson and Co.
Would've been interesting to see how Sark would've fucked this one up. -
See also:GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like the Budda Baker recruitment? ;-)BabsGilbyTawdTy said:
Would've been interesting to see how Sark would've fucked this one up.
Myles Jack — Suggest to certain web site Jack is a "bad kid with questionable grades" before offering his non-prospect "friend" an official visit and roster spot in a laughable ploy to entice a 4-star recruit. After Jack follows through on long-held UCLA commitment, cut friend loose for "academic reasons".
KeiVarae Russell — Piss off Russell's mother, then justify losing kid to ND by saying Russell's mom didn't like Washington (the school) despite certain web site suggesting all fall the Huskies were in the lead. How 'bout Russell and his mom didn't like Sark's bullshit recruiting tactic? Uh, yeah.
Scott Crichton — Fail to evaluate an in-state player with two Pac-12 offers all the while relentlessly pursuing a "name" prospect from SoCal in Josh Shirley.
Few greater myths than Sark's reputation as an elite recruiter ...
-
Kid is quick.
-
A little undersized for a DL, but I trust Petermen!
-
Browning to McClatcher... Touchdown Washington!
-
I remember Scott Eklund last week:
- It's looking like it's gonna be Arizona for Chico.
- Are you sure?
- Yes. It's Arizona.
He delivers as usual. That probably means we are not getting Chris Warren though, he has been saying UW is the leader for a couple weeks. -
God damn. Ektard being dumber than a sack of hammers never disappoints.The_Undertaker said:I remember Scott Eklund last week:
- It's looking like it's gonna be Arizona for Chico.
- Are you sure?
- Yes. It's Arizona.
He delivers as usual. That probably means we are not getting Chris Warren though, he has been saying UW is the leader for a couple weeks. -
Chico is a superb athlete with great hips.
-
Correct. That is the script.The_Undertaker said:I remember Scott Eklund last week:
- It's looking like it's gonna be Arizona for Chico.
- Are you sure?
- Yes. It's Arizona.
He delivers as usual. That probably means we are not getting Chris Warren though, he has been saying UW is the leader for a couple weeks. -
I personally think there is no way Warren comes here, and that thought is cemented by Tard saying we lead for him.
-
We didn't want him anyway
Wait...we got him? -
Griswald still questioning Petersen's ability to recruit in the Pac12?
-
Awfully warm out for February.
-
Phil Bleenor broke this news tomorrow.
-
The direct quote was "Chico McClatcher, yeah I heard he may have qualified. Doesn't matter. He's going to Arizona and the UW staff has moved on."The_Undertaker said:I remember Scott Eklund last week:
- It's looking like it's gonna be Arizona for Chico.
- Are you sure?
- Yes. It's Arizona.
He delivers as usual. That probably means we are not getting Chris Warren though, he has been saying UW is the leader for a couple weeks.
He's now trying to save face by saying Chico WAS going to zona but zona's staff backed off so he reached out to UW. What a fucking joke Tard is. -
I hope he turns out to be good but there has been a lot of hype around him for a,long time. If teams weren't after him that hard because of his grades I understand. I'm just surprised more teams didn't recruit him harder
-
Chico looks pretty damn good and is a big time get. I just watched his film for the first time. He's unreal in the open field.
http://www.hudl.com/athlete/929752/highlights/213367377 -
Ya, but is he worth two additional wins a season?RoadDawg55 said:Chico looks pretty damn good and is a big time get. I just watched his film for the first time. He's unreal in the open field.
http://www.hudl.com/athlete/929752/highlights/213367377
-
Depends solely on the quality of his hips.Southerndawg said:
Ya, but is he worth two additional wins a season?RoadDawg55 said:Chico looks pretty damn good and is a big time get. I just watched his film for the first time. He's unreal in the open field.
http://www.hudl.com/athlete/929752/highlights/213367377 -
I know jack shit about evaluating kids (75K), but I watched the film. Looked like Tecmo Bowl. Shake and Bake.
-
Is it me, or is he just stupid fast?????
-
FreeChavez said:
Is it me, or is he just stupid fast?????
-
Agree. He's a big play waiting to happen. I don't think his size is an issue except in one area...it can be kinda tough to find a guy that small in the passing game so you have to have plays designed to get him the ball. That's a small concern though. The rest is fine. He's fairly stocky for his age. Watch him be 5'7"/200lbs by the time he's a sophomore. That's really not a small back. It's all about proportions.RoadDawg55 said:Chico looks pretty damn good and is a big time get. I just watched his film for the first time. He's unreal in the open field.
http://www.hudl.com/athlete/929752/highlights/213367377 -
Keep Chico away from Mickens and his Legion of Zoom shit.
-
Stop plagiarism my shit, fucko.GrundleStiltzkin said:
