My Thoughts on the Playoff Field
Comments
-
apparently they do. and, based on what their commissioner said to Herbstreit in an interview yesterday, they'll likely have one in the very near future (as in next season).Doogles said:
I never have been a fan of conference championship games, i liked the old pac-10 round robin and don't think the big-12 necessarily needs a championship game to make the playoff.
cook it. -
What sense does it make to have a conference championship game when you play a complete round robin schedule? Baylor should have been crowned champ based on the head to head.creepycoug said:
apparently they do. and, based on what their commissioner said to Herbstreit in an interview yesterday, they'll likely have one in the very near future (as in next season).Doogles said:
I never have been a fan of conference championship games, i liked the old pac-10 round robin and don't think the big-12 necessarily needs a championship game to make the playoff.
cook it.
What happens next year when 1 team in the big goes undefeated then loses in the champ game to a team that lost only 1 game? The big12 won't get the lsu-alabama sec treatment in that scenario, that's for sure. -
The Big 12 fucked themselves in this deal IMHO. It is obvious they thought there was a good chance things could go there way and possibly get two in the playoff, so they massaged it and named co-champions. And got no one.
Co champions? By every metric they could have used, Baylor was the champion of the Big 12. Personally I think TCU was probably the better team, but the there was a two way tie at the top of a true round robin. HTH decides that. Name your champion and give them a little more meat on their bone with the committee. Dont compromise them and give the committee an easy out. And after OSU looked like they did Saturday night, they took it. -
Particularly true when your co-champions aren't historical bluebloods.BayDawg said:The Big 12 fucked themselves in this deal IMHO. It is obvious they thought there was a good chance things could go there way and possibly get two in the playoff, so they massaged it and named co-champions. And got no one.
Co champions? By every metric they could have used, Baylor was the champion of the Big 12. Personally I think TCU was probably the better team, but the there was a two way tie at the top of a true round robin. HTH decides that. Name your champion and give them a little more meat on their bone with the committee. Dont compromise them and give the committee an easy out. And after OSU looked like they did Saturday night, they took it.
I don't think the Big 12 will expand - there's nobody out there that they can add that will satisfy Texas (and that's a huge issue).
It will be interesting to see how the Big 12 operates going forward. Do they ask for the Conference Title Game? If so, do they do it based on geography or just have the Top 2 teams play an extra game? If that is the way it goes, take a situation like this year and you'll have Baylor plenty pissed off about a H2H win. But at the same time if you break it up into 5 team divisions that pretty much waters everything down and could result in a situation where you have 2 of your strong teams in the same division. -
Yep. Baylor should be absolutely pissed at the Big 12.BayDawg said:The Big 12 fucked themselves in this deal IMHO. It is obvious they thought there was a good chance things could go there way and possibly get two in the playoff, so they massaged it and named co-champions. And got no one.
Co champions? By every metric they could have used, Baylor was the champion of the Big 12. Personally I think TCU was probably the better team, but the there was a two way tie at the top of a true round robin. HTH decides that. Name your champion and give them a little more meat on their bone with the committee. Dont compromise them and give the committee an easy out. And after OSU looked like they did Saturday night, they took it. -
Some of you fucks need to stay under the 140 character limit.
-
Baylor should be pissed at their AD. Northwestern st, buffalo, smu ROTFLMAOOOOOO!!!!111!dnc said:
Yep. Baylor should be absolutely pissed at the Big 12.BayDawg said:The Big 12 fucked themselves in this deal IMHO. It is obvious they thought there was a good chance things could go there way and possibly get two in the playoff, so they massaged it and named co-champions. And got no one.
Co champions? By every metric they could have used, Baylor was the champion of the Big 12. Personally I think TCU was probably the better team, but the there was a two way tie at the top of a true round robin. HTH decides that. Name your champion and give them a little more meat on their bone with the committee. Dont compromise them and give the committee an easy out. And after OSU looked like they did Saturday night, they took it. -
TCU blew a 21 point lead with about 10 minutes left in the game (let that soak in)
Baylor lost to fucking West Virginia, who's head coach has a mullet.
Fuck'em both. -
The BXII should simply instead try not going full retard next year.Tequilla said:
Particularly true when your co-champions aren't historical bluebloods.BayDawg said:The Big 12 fucked themselves in this deal IMHO. It is obvious they thought there was a good chance things could go there way and possibly get two in the playoff, so they massaged it and named co-champions. And got no one.
Co champions? By every metric they could have used, Baylor was the champion of the Big 12. Personally I think TCU was probably the better team, but the there was a two way tie at the top of a true round robin. HTH decides that. Name your champion and give them a little more meat on their bone with the committee. Dont compromise them and give the committee an easy out. And after OSU looked like they did Saturday night, they took it.
I don't think the Big 12 will expand - there's nobody out there that they can add that will satisfy Texas (and that's a huge issue).
It will be interesting to see how the Big 12 operates going forward. Do they ask for the Conference Title Game? If so, do they do it based on geography or just have the Top 2 teams play an extra game? If that is the way it goes, take a situation like this year and you'll have Baylor plenty pissed off about a H2H win. But at the same time if you break it up into 5 team divisions that pretty much waters everything down and could result in a situation where you have 2 of your strong teams in the same division.
Big12 recovery plan for 2015:
1) take your double slight like men. Patterson has been great, Briles and the commish are whining like bitches.
2) tell the Baylor AD to adopt non-vaginal scheduling practices. Plenty of p5 intersectionals get scheduled in a hurry if the parties involved want to buy off some cupcakes to do it.
3) have a fucking tie breaker in place and stick to it hell or high water.
4) promote the one true champion you have allegedly produced and ignore the runner up unless you've been touted all season as the new SEC west or some shit.
The BXII didn't need an extra game. They needed to smear five gallons of lipstick on Baylor's ugly mug and back that pig at the dance. They gambled on two ugly girls making it big and lost bigger. I guess Texans' belt buckles really are tombstones for their dicks when they go on like whiny bitches when their grifting got exposed.
Baylor was never going to make the playoff if it could be helped because their case sucks due to SMU, nw State and buffalo.
The narrative we hear too much is the BXII "was screwed." The one that needs more exposure is how the BXII tried to fuck up the inaugural CFP before it had a chance to succeed by pimping two unworthy teams from a "one champion" league. -
The B12 should be forced to add BYU and ND.







