here's why I think Washington beats Boise
Comments
-
The season is over
-
Race, stop living in the past.RaceBannon said:The season is over
We have John Ross.
Retake Montlake.
-
Stats. Loosers.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Anything less than a 10 pt victory is a moral loss in this game.
In the bowl UW had 50 more yards, 2 more turnovers plus a plethora of mistakes....Price missing guys wide open, Kasen dropping a TD, defense giving up grotesque 3rd and longs. Now UW is playing at home AND returns almost everyone while Boise has to deal with some losses. Boise lost 6 starters on D and has new corners and new LBs.
Yes, Boise has a strong DL...so strong that Sankey ran for 200 and caught another 75 in screen passes while Price threw 50% and still had 250 yards. Meanwhile, last year the D gave up 16ppg at home (ex Portland St) against a handful of good teams.
A good performance would be 41-17 or 34-14....or 34-17.
Boise should be able to move the ball through the air a bit. In any case the job for the defense is to wrap up the QB. They got a lot of pressure on him but couldn't wrap up and he had some big runs.
You guys are missing the Sark angle to this game. After UW wins by 7 or 10, he'll get a lot of credit as if he just beat a top 10 team, when in reality Boise is a middle of the road game that should be a comfortable victory. And even if UW wins by 17, it doesn't mean Sark has turned a corner. His problem is consistency. -
ThomasFremont said:
Exactly. There can be no doubt. Even the biggest Sark slurper needs to see the painful and obvious truth we have been preaching since day 1. But, as always, I hope he wins a Rose Bowl and proves what a nega fucktard I am.</
Sark is going to win the North. And because the south stinks I think he will get to Pasadena. Then we get 7 more years of Sark. Is it worth it? -
Yes, winning a Rose Bowl is worth it. You sound like someone who would rather be right than see the team win. Sad.
-
This game really doen't matter in a strategic sense. There is one, and one issue only with the program: Cream Puff.
I hope he's successufl this year. Sucess = 10 & 2 and a BCS Bowl. Anything less confirms this weak, soft frat boy is the train wreck he appears to be.
God forbid the worst of all possible outcomes 8 - 5 which means we are married to a loser. A 9 - 3 season is nearly as bad. The long term damage we'll suffer from lack of recruiting linemen can't be overstated. The lines are disasters of epic proportions. The creator of this mess needs to go. 9 & 3 changes nothing.
I like to get snarky and cute about him, but I honestly don't feel Steve is even average. In this conference he is well into the botton half of coaches. Win now, right now, or the Hindenburg level failure is preferable. If it's the latter, no better time to start the flameout than next weekend.
The purge of everyone connected with the offensive staff can begin (with the exception of Tui.) -
Made some changes to help you out:dhdawg said:If u want to break it down position by position
QB: BSU
RB: UW
WR: UW
TE: UW
OL:BSUPush
DL:BSUPush
LB: UW
CB:BSUPush
S:push(neither are very good). Parker is overrated, and there's no one else really. BSU
coach: big BSU here
Homefield: UW
very evenly matched.
It's a given Sark will get outcoached, the big question is can Price outpreform Southwick
1. OL - Boise St lost 3 of their starters. 2 guys on the right side are 1st time starters. As much as I have been disappointed with our Oline, having a healthy line make this a PUSH.
2. DL - Boise St only has 2 starters back, and they will have 3 true Frosh and 2 JC guys in their rotation with no experience. PUSH
3. CB - Boise St lost BOTH starters. Douglas is coming of a knee injury and has not played a snap in over 1.5 years. PUSH, maybe slight UW edge with the game experience of Peters & Ducre.
4. S - Boise St has both starting safeties back. I think Parker is better than both Ioane & Thompson, but Shamburger is the wild card. Edge Boise St.
And a healthy Keith Price is = or > than Southwick. But until I see him play this year, I will stick with Boise St have a slight edge. -
I'm going off Peterson's history of player developement at those positions. HTH. I don't really care who they lostIrishDawg22 said:
Made some changes to help you out:dhdawg said:If u want to break it down position by position
QB: BSU
RB: UW
WR: UW
TE: UW
OL:BSUPush
DL:BSUPush
LB: UW
CB:BSUPush
S:push(neither are very good). Parker is overrated, and there's no one else really. BSU
coach: big BSU here
Homefield: UW
very evenly matched.
It's a given Sark will get outcoached, the big question is can Price outpreform Southwick
1. OL - Boise St lost 3 of their starters. 2 guys on the right side are 1st time starters. As much as I have been disappointed with our Oline, having a healthy line make this a PUSH.
2. DL - Boise St only has 2 starters back, and they will have 3 true Frosh and 2 JC guys in their rotation with no experience. PUSH
3. CB - Boise St lost BOTH starters. Douglas is coming of a knee injury and has not played a snap in over 1.5 years. PUSH, maybe slight UW edge with the game experience of Peters & Ducre.
4. S - Boise St has both starting safeties back. I think Parker is better than both Ioane & Thompson, but Shamburger is the wild card. Edge Boise St.
And a healthy Keith Price is = or > than Southwick. But until I see him play this year, I will stick with Boise St have a slight edge.
-
I'm going off Peterson's history of player developement at those positions. HTH. I don't really care who they lostIrishDawg22 said:
Made some changes to help you out:dhdawg said:If u want to break it down position by position
QB: BSU
RB: UW
WR: UW
TE: UW
OL:BSUPush
DL:BSUPush
LB: UW
CB:BSUPush
S:push(neither are very good). Parker is overrated, and there's no one else really. BSU
coach: big BSU here
Homefield: UW
very evenly matched.
It's a given Sark will get outcoached, the big question is can Price outpreform Southwick
1. OL - Boise St lost 3 of their starters. 2 guys on the right side are 1st time starters. As much as I have been disappointed with our Oline, having a healthy line make this a PUSH.
2. DL - Boise St only has 2 starters back, and they will have 3 true Frosh and 2 JC guys in their rotation with no experience. PUSH
3. CB - Boise St lost BOTH starters. Douglas is coming of a knee injury and has not played a snap in over 1.5 years. PUSH, maybe slight UW edge with the game experience of Peters & Ducre.
4. S - Boise St has both starting safeties back. I think Parker is better than both Ioane & Thompson, but Shamburger is the wild card. Edge Boise St.
And a healthy Keith Price is = or > than Southwick. But until I see him play this year, I will stick with Boise St have a slight edge.
-
Only when we play WSU, Colorado and Idaho State will UW have a "push" at OL.IrishDawg22 said:
Made some changes to help you out:dhdawg said:If u want to break it down position by position
QB: BSU
RB: UW
WR: UW
TE: UW
OL:BSUPush
DL:BSUPush
LB: UW
CB:BSUPush
S:push(neither are very good). Parker is overrated, and there's no one else really. BSU
coach: big BSU here
Homefield: UW
very evenly matched.
It's a given Sark will get outcoached, the big question is can Price outpreform Southwick
1. OL - Boise St lost 3 of their starters. 2 guys on the right side are 1st time starters. As much as I have been disappointed with our Oline, having a healthy line make this a PUSH.
2. DL - Boise St only has 2 starters back, and they will have 3 true Frosh and 2 JC guys in their rotation with no experience. PUSH
3. CB - Boise St lost BOTH starters. Douglas is coming of a knee injury and has not played a snap in over 1.5 years. PUSH, maybe slight UW edge with the game experience of Peters & Ducre.
4. S - Boise St has both starting safeties back. I think Parker is better than both Ioane & Thompson, but Shamburger is the wild card. Edge Boise St.
And a healthy Keith Price is = or > than Southwick. But until I see him play this year, I will stick with Boise St have a slight edge. -
speed, speed, speed
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
