Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
here's why I think Washington beats Boise
Comments
-
If Sark is to fail, I don't want it to be wishy-washy and left to a judge's ruling. I want it to be as spectacular as the Hindenburg.ThomasFremont said:As much as it sucks, Sark getting plundered in the new stadium opener might be the best thing for the program. Yes, I want America to fail.
-
I don't see what pirates have to do with any of this.ThomasFremont said:As much as it sucks, Sark getting plundered in the new stadium opener might be the best thing for the program. Yes, I want America to fail.
-
An opening game blow out always seals the fate for a crappy coach.
Gilby vs Fresno in 2004, Ty vs Oregon in 2008.
I can't think of a bigger opening game given the cloud over this coaching staff since well that Oregon game in 2008.
I have UW going 7-6 but winning this game. -
Exactly. There can be no doubt. Even the biggest Sark slurper needs to see the painful and obvious truth we have been preaching since day 1. But, as always, I hope he wins a Rose Bowl and proves what a nega fucktard I am.
-
I feel the same about this and would be gladly proven wrong. Because, if we are right about Sark, I don't see Woodward making the necessary changes. So, I hope Sark becomes a good, even great coach. Been waiting too long for the program to recover from all the shit during the last two decades.ThomasFremont said:Exactly. There can be no doubt. Even the biggest Sark slurper needs to see the painful and obvious truth we have been preaching since day 1. But, as always, I hope he wins a Rose Bowl and proves what a nega fucktard I am.
-
Why I say 8-5 is the worst possible season. Accomplishes nothing and Sark is extended.ThomasFremont said:Exactly. There can be no doubt. Even the biggest Sark slurper needs to see the painful and obvious truth we have been preaching since day 1. But, as always, I hope he wins a Rose Bowl and proves what a nega fucktard I am.
I want 9+ wins or a 4-8 get Sark run type of year. -
i have no fucking clue what to expect. we could win a close game. we could blow the donkeys (LMAO!) out, they could beat the shit out of us, who the fuck knows. i will be hammered though.
-
blowing the donkeys out sounds wrong on many levels
-
Anything less than a 10 pt victory is a moral loss in this game.
In the bowl UW had 50 more yards, 2 more turnovers plus a plethora of mistakes....Price missing guys wide open, Kasen dropping a TD, defense giving up grotesque 3rd and longs. Now UW is playing at home AND returns almost everyone while Boise has to deal with some losses. Boise lost 6 starters on D and has new corners and new LBs.
Yes, Boise has a strong DL...so strong that Sankey ran for 200 and caught another 75 in screen passes while Price threw 50% and still had 250 yards. Meanwhile, last year the D gave up 16ppg at home (ex Portland St) against a handful of good teams.
A good performance would be 41-17 or 34-14....or 34-17.
Boise should be able to move the ball through the air a bit. In any case the job for the defense is to wrap up the QB. They got a lot of pressure on him but couldn't wrap up and he had some big runs.
You guys are missing the Sark angle to this game. After UW wins by 7 or 10, he'll get a lot of credit as if he just beat a top 10 team, when in reality Boise is a middle of the road game that should be a comfortable victory. And even if UW wins by 17, it doesn't mean Sark has turned a corner. His problem is consistency.
-
No such thing as moral wins or moral losses.
Just if you win or lose.




