Sarkisian wants to win every game, not just UCLA

sarktastic said:

creepycoug said:

KenND said:

USC has already won 7 games. ND lock.

7 wins is more of a guideline you motherless whore.

he's taking it to 8 this year and cooling his seat. and beating ND's ass at the same time is just a bonus.

He has a mother, her name is Mary FRANNY. Lighten up.

creepycoug said:

KenND said:

USC has already won 7 games. ND lock.

7 wins is more of a guideline you motherless whore.

he's taking it to 8 this year and cooling his seat. and beating ND's ass at the same time is just a bonus.

Try harder

KenND said:

creepycoug said:

KenND said:

USC has already won 7 games. ND lock.

7 wins is more of a guideline you motherless whore.

he's taking it to 8 this year and cooling his seat. and beating ND's ass at the same time is just a bonus.

Whoosh!!

I think you got whooshed by mis-reading my whoosh on your whoosh.

don't take yourself so seriously.

and remember, sometimes when we whoosh, we get a responsive whoosh in return.

all except the part about SC beating ND. i've yet to encounter the circumstances in which I'd root for ND to win that one.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

“Cody had some opportunities early in the game that we just didn’t take advantage of,” Sarkisian said.

Translation: I'm a great play caller but the players didn't execute.

Trust issues. Just like with the frail black one he had.

creepycoug said:

KenND said:

creepycoug said:

KenND said:

USC has already won 7 games. ND lock.

7 wins is more of a guideline you motherless whore.

he's taking it to 8 this year and cooling his seat. and beating ND's ass at the same time is just a bonus.

Whoosh!!

I think you got whooshed by mis-reading my whoosh on your whoosh.

don't take yourself so seriously.

and remember, sometimes when we whoosh, we get a responsive whoosh in return.

all except the part about SC beating ND. i've yet to encounter the circumstances in which I'd root for ND to win that one.

While I disagree with your premise, I find your counter-argument to be intriguing and irrreprehensible. The factual evidence you stated is nuanced and introverted, but have no discretion with the Catholic church, although I prevail over child molestion. The flawed preamble displays a lack of prevalence and the supporting development is risqué at best. I found the entire agreement to be preposterous and about three paragraphs to sort. In summarization, I feel as though the USC offense will find little gregarious belief in their wizard and the dame's games will become more fantastical as time progresses and characters are developed.

Notre Dame 45
USC 23