Re: sloppiness

Comments

• Options

  Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623

  

  November 2014

  Comparing penalties per play with the conference avg would be interesting. Or not. Either way it would be interesting.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  TheChart Member Posts: 76

  

  November 2014

  I like your chart.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123

  

  

  November 2014

  For the first 6 games, the team did a great job taking care of the ball. Since the Oregon game, that hasn't been the case. Penalties seem to be getting better, but there is still a lot of room for improvement. Good chart though. It shows some little improvements have been made.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

  

  November 2014

  The fumbles number is way high, but..... Cyler. 2012 Keith Price was also a big fan of fumbling. I would wager to guess that if a team is fumbling a lot it probably has a lot to do with their QB.
  
  Good Chit.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  Gladstone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,417

  

  

  November 2014

  Excellent, thanks for sharing.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481

  

  

  November 2014

  What I was curious about is whether this is a new, Petersen trend of sloppiness, or the fitful breaking of the Sark slop tendencies.
  
  Penalties are still way too high, but better than 3/5 Sark years. Interceptions are much better. Turnovers are better than 4/5 Sark years.
  
  I lean with breaking the Sark trends, not something new.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter