Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I Don't Get It

HFNY
HFNY Member Posts: 5,570
in Hardcore Husky Board
1. There is no debate that, on 4th down, there would've been time on the clock had we prematurely gone into victory formation.

2. Our long-snapper already had a wild PAT snap that cost us 1 point and Korey Durkee dropped the ball against ASU so why would we go backwards on the Victory formation and then snap the ball with a wild snapper and a punter who could drop it again?

3. THIS IS SO DUMB. IF COOPER HOLDS ONTO THE BALL, WE NEVER WOULD BE HAVING THIS DISCUSSION!

COOPER IS A RS-SR WHLE THE SNAPPER IS A WALK-ON AND DURKEE IS A 1ST YEAR PUNTER.

YOU TRUST ONE OF YOUR RS-SR TEAM LEADER TO SEAL THE VICTORY.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,840
    This.

    There were so many errors in this game to try and pin point any one action is fucktarded.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    Agree. Neuheisal made a pretty strong case for the victory formation and the QB running around wasting the extra time during his post game. It almost sold me. All I was thinking in the situation, though, was grind out one more first down and keep the fucking ball out of Miles' hands as much as possible.

    I don't get paid the big bucks though.

    I do know there wasn't a dry eye in the house when Coop coughed that game losing fumble up though lol. Come on fuckers this place is supposed to be funny!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,570
    Yeah, the missed PAT, Miles with two unforced fumbles, missed blitz pick-ups, Miles holding onto the ball too long, etc etc.

    I know it's easy (and PC) for FAT MEN at the Seattle Times, etc to blame the coaches but the players lost this game. I thought the play-calling was mostly exceptional on both sides of the ball.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    If you can't get a new coach, at least get a new chart that tells them what to do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    Canard said:

    If you can't get a new coach, at least get a new chart that tells them what to do.

    FOC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,840
    Canard said:

    If you can't get a new coach, at least get a new chart that tells them what to do.

    Every coach, including yours, uses charts.

    It is fucktarded or completely naive to pretend this is the first time any of us have ever heard of the chart.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,570
    edited November 2014
    I guess the point that there still would've been time on the clock with taking the victory formation and then having to snap it with a walk-on who already had a wild-snap and a punter who dropped the ball a few weeks ago isn't making it through some thick skulls.

    And the suggestion that a QB who has already fumbled twice takes a shotgun snap from a center who was wild with his snaps most of the day and does a quick punt is also fucking stupid.

    Your best odds are to go with a RS-SR to run the ball forward and rather than to go backwards and then snap it far backwards in a pressure situation with a previously wild walk-on snapper and a 1st year punter who dropped a snap a few games ago.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    topdawgnc said:

    Canard said:

    If you can't get a new coach, at least get a new chart that tells them what to do.

    Every coach, including yours, uses charts.

    It is fucktarded or completely naive to pretend this is the first time any of us have ever heard of the chart.
    ^^^ what my chart says as well. FO,C
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter