What SoftyFS is hearing
Comments
-
Fortunately, Hundley can only throw the deep ball. And there isn't a receiver in the country that will beat Ross deep.greenblood said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
Ross will probably give up the game winning touchdown on a deep pass -
FO, PGOS
-
Massively over-valuing Peters IMOdnc said:
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
I'd take Trufant over Peters. -
100% agree.Tequilla said:
Massively over-valuing Peters IMOdnc said:
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
I'd take Trufant over Peters.
Peters picks Trufant's cotton. -
ThomasFremont said:
100% agree.Tequilla said:
Massively over-valuing Peters IMOdnc said:
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
I'd take Trufant over Peters.
Peters picks Trufant's cotton.
-
POTYThomasFremont said:
100% agree.Tequilla said:
Massively over-valuing Peters IMOdnc said:
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
I'd take Trufant over Peters.
Peters picks Trufant's cotton. -
I just heard the news. Not shocked because you could see his persona on the field wasn't exactly Peterman's type of behavior. If he behaves the same during practice, I understand.
But damn, my two favorite players at the end of last season have now been dismissed (String). -
Is this a whoosh attempt? You do realize that after Sloppy Steve left for USC, Tui was the interim coach and he suspended him for part of the bowl game against BYU.
So let's see......1 player, 2 different staffs, and multiple suspensions / issues over the last two seasons for that 1 player.
1 player vs. numerous coaches on each staff....hmmmmmmm.....tough one to figure out.sarktastic said:
Under Sark, Peters was on track to graduate and was developing into a 1st round NFL draft pick playing on a team set to challenge for a Pac-12 title.CuntWaffle said:Lol this speaks volumes about
SarkPeterman.
Peterman comes along and he's flunked out of school (allegedly), kicked off the team and his draft stock is tumbling.
Kim called it. -
Trufant > Lockner too, of course.Tequilla said:
Massively over-valuing Peters IMOdnc said:
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
I'd take Trufant over Peters.
And Senior Trufant might have a slight edge over junior Peters. But Peters career was far better than Trufant's.
-
True Senior Trufant >>> RS Junior Peters
I get that there are a few on this board that hate Locker as a QB from the standpoint that they think he's tremendously overrated. That's fine.
There's really no reason for him to take the bashing that he gets at this point. And for every QB that this University has had since Cody Pickett, I'd take Locker over every single one of them.
Locker was far from perfect ... but he was also far from its biggest problem.
