I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.
Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.
If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.
OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).
I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.
Fuck you.
Mike. I know you sell toilets for a living but you might want to learn beginners math.
9-5 (.643) <<<< 9-4 (.692)
I am not sure how nine wins wouldn't be a step back given the easier nature of the extended schedule for 2014.
Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.
I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.
I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.
With this schedule, and now with Halliday's injury and OSU completely off the cliff, there are 8 games on this schedule that are completely un-loseable. Peterman hasn't managed to lose any of these games.
On the flip side, he hasn't won a single game that wasn't un-loseable either. He's got 2 of each category left. LIPO
I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.
Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.
If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.
OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).
I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.
Fuck you.
Mike. I know you sell toilets for a living but you might want to learn beginners math.
9-5 (.643) Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.
I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.
I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.
Sark left no one on the offense, and only 1 season's worth of players on the defense.
If you can't see we have depth and personnel issues moving forward, you are FS.
PETERMAN DIDN"T HAVE TO DEAL WITH 0-12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sark inherited 16 NFL players that were on his roster, left to him by Willingham. He inherited what was called a "bare cupboard" according to many non-husky, Husky experts. They hailed Sark for his amazing conquest of 5 wins his first year.
Sark didn't leave the the team in shambles this year. Next year I think our talent blows.
Defense is good everywhere but safety.
Offense doesn't have a top flight tailback or qb but they should not be the worst offense in the conference. Petersen gets paid a lot of money to figure it out and right now I would say they have underachieved.
Funny. Petersen is going to cobble together 8 or 9 wins out of the piece of shit offense he was given. Doogs will hate him and still pop wood for the ex-coach who took five years to win 8 games.
I don't want rain on your moral victory, but it's important to remember that 6 of those '8 or 9 wins' came at the expense of the following teams:
Hawaii Eastern Washington Illinois Georgia State Colorado Cal
Funny. Petersen is going to cobble together 8 or 9 wins out of the piece of shit offense he was given. Doogs will hate him and still pop wood for the ex-coach who took five years to win 8 games.
I don't want rain on your moral victory, but it's important to remember that 6 of those '8 or 9 wins' came at the expense of the following teams:
Hawaii Eastern Washington Illinois Georgia State Colorado Cal
He's right, you know.
When Cal is the best win on your schedule, you haven't done much.
Comments
Fuck you.
9-5 (.643) <<<< 9-4 (.692)
I am not sure how nine wins wouldn't be a step back given the easier nature of the extended schedule for 2014.
Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.
I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.
I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.
On the flip side, he hasn't won a single game that wasn't un-loseable either. He's got 2 of each category left. LIPO
.540 > .885
If you can't see we have depth and personnel issues moving forward, you are FS.
5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4
Defense is good everywhere but safety.
Offense doesn't have a top flight tailback or qb but they should not be the worst offense in the conference. Petersen gets paid a lot of money to figure it out and right now I would say they have underachieved.
The offense has been a shit show.
Hawaii
Eastern Washington
Illinois
Georgia State
Colorado
Cal
When Cal is the best win on your schedule, you haven't done much.
You're a crook, Captain Hook