Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Peak Performance for a first year coach isn't 5 wins?

sarktastic
sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
in Hardcore Husky Board
I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect, really,but that "real" husky fans can spot the obvious upgrade anyway.

Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SevenEleven
    SevenEleven Member Posts: 318
    LIPO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    MikeDamone said:

    Funny. Petersen is going to cobble together 8 or 9 wins out of the piece of shit offense he was given. Doogs will hate him and still pop wood for the ex-coach who took five years to win 8 games.

    This.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    For that matter, UW lost at home to two teams that suck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2014
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    I never said that. He is however making changes that are improving the team and will continue to do so.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    But I do get your poont, @RoadDawg55
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    TTJ said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    Maybe he loses the Colorado game?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    TTJ said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TTJ said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    Maybe he loses the Colorado game?
    Or Cal? EWU? Hawai'i? He'd probably have managed to fuck one of these up.
    Or instead of losing to asu, gets plunged.

    Like the asu game. ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    I *heart* when Dawg fans are fighting over the quality of the wins in a winning season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Slocus
    Slocus Member Posts: 289
    TTJ said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TTJ said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    Maybe he loses the Colorado game?
    Or Cal? EWU? Hawai'i? He'd probably have managed to fuck one of these up.
    Or all of them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,229 Founders Club
    I'm firmly convinced UW is 3-6 or 4-5 under Sloppy Seven
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dick_B
    Dick_B Member Posts: 1,301
    edited November 2014
    TTJ said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    please to be remembering that according to eklundfs snark recrooted these quarterbacks to his system, so any of them would be in the hi-smen talk by now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    TTJ said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TTJ said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    Maybe he loses the Colorado game?
    Or Cal? EWU? Hawai'i? He'd probably have managed to fuck one of these up.
    I nearly got ran for saying Sark would not start the season 4-0.

    He then left for SC ... and NostraTopdawg was unable to strut his shit.

    I seriously doubt Sark beats EWU.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KenND
    KenND Member Posts: 272
    topdawgnc said:

    TTJ said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TTJ said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Anyone pining for Sark is a moron, but stop acting like Petersen has worked miracles to win the 6 games he has. All 6 of those teams have sucked.

    Which begs the question: Would El Siete be 6-3 right now with this personnel? I doubt it.
    Maybe he loses the Colorado game?
    Or Cal? EWU? Hawai'i? He'd probably have managed to fuck one of these up.
    I nearly got ran for saying Sark would not start the season 4-0.

    He then left for SC ... and NostraTopdawg was unable to strut his shit.

    I seriously doubt Sark beats EWU.
    UW beat EWU by running the ball down their throat. There's no way in hell that Sark would have stuck with the run game. He'd have tried to get cute at some point, guaranteed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    PETERMAN DIDN"T HAVE TO DEAL WITH 0-12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,331
    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I hope leach is coach for life. He sucks at coaching. Law is his forte
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2014
    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,015
    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I hope leach is coach for life. He sucks at coaching. Law is his forte
    Snake oil sales is his forte. The Great and Powerful Oz of college football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,331
    edited November 2014
    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    Mike. I know you sell toilets for a living but you might want to learn beginners math.

    9-5 (.643) <<<< 9-4 (.692)

    I am not sure how nine wins wouldn't be a step back given the easier nature of the extended schedule for 2014.

    Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.

    I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.

    I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    In the world of Doogs:

    .540 > .885
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    EwaDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    Mike. I know you sell toilets for a living but you might want to learn beginners math.

    9-5 (.643) Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.

    I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.

    I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.

    Sark left no one on the offense, and only 1 season's worth of players on the defense.

    If you can't see we have depth and personnel issues moving forward, you are FS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    PurpleJ said:

    PETERMAN DIDN"T HAVE TO DEAL WITH 0-12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Sark inherited 16 NFL players that were on his roster, left to him by Willingham. He inherited what was called a "bare cupboard" according to many non-husky, Husky experts. They hailed Sark for his amazing conquest of 5 wins his first year.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WedgwoodDawg
    WedgwoodDawg Member Posts: 184
    topdawgnc said:


    In the world of Doogs:

    .540 > .885

    Also in the world of doogs:

    5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter