Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Peak Performance for a first year coach isn't 5 wins?

13

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I hope leach is coach for life. He sucks at coaching. Law is his forte
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2014
    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 49,026 Standard Supporter
    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I hope leach is coach for life. He sucks at coaching. Law is his forte
    Snake oil sales is his forte. The Great and Powerful Oz of college football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,496
    edited November 2014
    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    Mike. I know you sell toilets for a living but you might want to learn beginners math.

    9-5 (.643) <<<< 9-4 (.692)

    I am not sure how nine wins wouldn't be a step back given the easier nature of the extended schedule for 2014.

    Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.

    I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.

    I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,842
    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    In the world of Doogs:

    .540 > .885
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,020
    EwaDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    EwaDawg said:

    sarktastic said:

    I was told... by non-Husky, Husky experts, 5 wins in the first year of a new coach is the most you can expect.

    Now we're learning 6 wins casts a pall of doom that suggests we have the wrong guy coaching.

    If you are referring to the CUOGS, they are now saying Leech needs six years. I REALLY hope they give it to him.

    OTOH, UW could win nine this year and it would be considered a step back from last year (obviously, it would involve five losses).



    I can see it now. 9 wins this years is a step back for 9 wins last year. But Sark left the cupboard full.

    Fuck you.
    Mike. I know you sell toilets for a living but you might want to learn beginners math.

    9-5 (.643) Sark left enough in the cupboard to compete. Pete is decent at getting the most out of what he has. He took Sark's leftovers and added his OKGs. From my count, Pete has played roughly 8 of his own recruits with several making significant contributions.

    I didn't say that a small step backward isn't acceptable. Or even not expected. You are taking exception to the multiple voices in your head - not to anything I said. It is your very vivid (but likely drug induced) imagination.

    I long ago quit hoping for the day that Mike Damone is not a total dumbass retard. It just won't happen.

    Sark left no one on the offense, and only 1 season's worth of players on the defense.

    If you can't see we have depth and personnel issues moving forward, you are FS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    PurpleJ said:

    PETERMAN DIDN"T HAVE TO DEAL WITH 0-12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Sark inherited 16 NFL players that were on his roster, left to him by Willingham. He inherited what was called a "bare cupboard" according to many non-husky, Husky experts. They hailed Sark for his amazing conquest of 5 wins his first year.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WedgwoodDawg
    WedgwoodDawg Member Posts: 184
    topdawgnc said:


    In the world of Doogs:

    .540 > .885

    Also in the world of doogs:

    5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter