PAC12 Passes 4-year Scholarship Guarantees
This puts a HUGE emphasis on player evaluations going forward for all coaching staffs in recruiting. This makes me happy.
Comments
-
Pepsi,
So for those coaches that run players out of the program after 2-3 years because they aren't developing properly, even if those players leave the program, they will count against the 85?
-
Guaranteed, or not. Either way, it'll be an interesting ride.
-
-
Hello secret "not-in-good-standing" squads.
-
This is so stupid. I have never heard of a school revoking a student's scholarship over playing like crap or injuries. Doing that would have been recruiting suicide. What player would want to go to a school knowing that if they got severely hurt or didn't perform to expectations, their scholarship would be revoked?
-
Not sure about dat, dat would be a question for Jewd.Tequilla said:Pepsi,
So for those coaches that run players out of the program after 2-3 years because they aren't developing properly, even if those players leave the program, they will count against the 85? -
25+25+25+25+25=85 Even at Oregon.greenblood said:This is so stupid. I have never heard of a school revoking a student's scholarship over playing like crap or injuries. Doing that would have been recruiting suicide. What player would want to go to a school knowing that if they got severely hurt or didn't perform to expectations, their scholarship would be revoked?
-
I trust your connections better than Jude's
-
The only scholarships I could see a school taking away would be acquired scholarships from walk-ons. Walk-ons get scholarships pending on availability. If coach needs to make room for another late signee, then yes they might take from the walk-on. However, I remember Lane Kiffin doing that one year, and it got a huge amount of bad press. I just don't think this is very common. Also, Oregon hasn't signed a 25 player class in who knows how long.sarktastic said:
25+25+25+25+25=85 Even at Oregon.greenblood said:This is so stupid. I have never heard of a school revoking a student's scholarship over playing like crap or injuries. Doing that would have been recruiting suicide. What player would want to go to a school knowing that if they got severely hurt or didn't perform to expectations, their scholarship would be revoked?
-
Will the Romar math class be cancelled?
-
@Tequilla, got the question answered by premium partner Christian Caple. If the player is run off in good standing he will still count against the 85. Sark is fucked.
-
There should be a Durkee exception clause tho.
There should seriously be an exception for worthless punters and kickers. -
How is "good standing" defined? Is that loophole?
-
Chris Hemphill says hi.greenblood said:This is so stupid. I have never heard of a school revoking a student's scholarship over playing like crap or injuries. Doing that would have been recruiting suicide. What player would want to go to a school knowing that if they got severely hurt or didn't perform to expectations, their scholarship would be revoked?
