Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I try to ignore doogs

WilburHooksHands
WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
in Hardcore Husky Board
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    The oline is total shit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    edited October 2014
    WilburHooksHands said:

    I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

    I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    uzi said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

    I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.
    I wouldn't go that far. A lot of us said, "well they are experienced, but...."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    WilburHooksHands said:

    uzi said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

    I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.
    I wouldn't go that far. A lot of us said, "well they are experienced, but...."
    I expected it to be better. I figured they were doing something right helping Sankey gain all those yards. It's amazing that Sankey could get so many yards with this group. In the OL's defense, when they do create holes, the RB's go down after 5 or 6 yards. I don't think they are terrible, but they are average. Average with a group this experienced is really bad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Take this to the O-line bored!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,269 Standard Supporter
    WilburHooksHands said:

    I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

    Only at the UW do players not get better over time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,192
    dtd said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

    Only at the UW do players not get better over time.
    Not on Skeetahman's watch
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • biak1
    biak1 Member Posts: 4,237
    You really need to stop with the instant gratification and give Petersen 8 years to get his guys in here, bring Dan Cozzetto back in 3 years from now (after he's tanned, rested, and ready), and let the Cascade Front Mk. II get a few years with Socha under their belts. Then our boys will be ready to rumble.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JaWarrenJaHooker
    JaWarrenJaHooker Member Posts: 2,122
    Who recruited this O line
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Yes, it's cool to say Peterson's a failure for not winning a NC yet.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    uzi said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

    I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the past 7 seasons started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.
    Fixed for historical accuracy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    JaWarrenJaHooker said:

    Who recruited this O line

    It's Peterman's team. Peterman's responsibility.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    I am DoodHIV positive, I will probably die a doog. The majority thinks we're going to be worse next year since we're losing a few big contributors to the NFL this offseason. I think if coaching is half as important as has been said previously, we should be improved next year. More details, more coaching, more Dissly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,508
    TheOLinewillbefineTheOLinewillbefineTheOLinewillbefineTheOLinewillbefineTheOLinewillbefine
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter