Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Petersen's comments...presented without comment

124»

Comments

  • PDXDuckFan
    PDXDuckFan Member Posts: 450
    edited October 2014
    brchco12 said:

    dnc said:

    brchco12 said:



    5 4* so far this year, including a QB who fits his system and chose us over alabama.

    Five 4* players according to which site? Every site I've seen has the Dawgs with two 4* players.

    http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=Pac-12

    http://insider.espn.go.com/college-sports/football/recruiting/classrankings?action=login

    http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/teamrank/2015/PAC12/all

    Is Cody Bruns being counted as a 4* again?


    Fuck me for poasting this link

    thank you sir, i didn't have the stomach to actually link scout.com

    this is why oregon fans are fags, they dont show up until after the game
    Yes, Scout also had Cody Bruns as a 4* player. They are an outlier. We all know that Fetters, Ecklund, and whoever else ranks Doog recruits is the ultimate Doog. Myles Gaskin as a 4* RB? SMH

  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    This thread has really gone downhill, yikes. Whole lot of stoopid here.
  • PDXDuckFan
    PDXDuckFan Member Posts: 450
    brchco12 said:



    this is why oregon fans are fags, they dont show up until after the game

    EwaDawg said:

    AZDuck said:

    I just want to be clear, I'm not out there on the limb with Canard. I just don't think he's as full of shit as some people out here (Hi Kim!).

    Canard went full retard when he said 0regon was smart to ensure continued mediocrity by promoting sling blade as HC instead of hiring Petersen.

    Then he compares the results of a new coach (with a new system) to an assistant who was promoted from within.

    Blowing shit up and starting over will take longer than making a quick fix.

    Hellfrick may have already peaked with his two losses per year. Yet, Pete is a failure because he lost two games in his first (half) year at UW when the team lost four the prior year.

    Canard FS. No other way to put it.
    Slingblade 1
    CoachPeeth 0

  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,384
    You are FS.

    Scout had Danny Shelton as a 3 star and obviously screwed that up. Scout also had Mariota as a 3 star. Same for Kikaha. Scout is just as able to under rank guys as they are to over rank guys.

    Quit being so FS.

    brchco12 said:

    dnc said:

    brchco12 said:



    5 4* so far this year, including a QB who fits his system and chose us over alabama.

    Five 4* players according to which site? Every site I've seen has the Dawgs with two 4* players.

    http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=Pac-12

    http://insider.espn.go.com/college-sports/football/recruiting/classrankings?action=login

    http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/teamrank/2015/PAC12/all

    Is Cody Bruns being counted as a 4* again?


    Fuck me for poasting this link

    thank you sir, i didn't have the stomach to actually link scout.com

    this is why oregon fans are fags, they dont show up until after the game
    Yes, Scout also had Cody Bruns as a 4* player. They are an outlier. We all know that Fetters, Ecklund, and whoever else ranks Doog recruits is the ultimate Doog. Myles Gaskin as a 4* RB? SMH

  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    EwaDawg said:

    AZDuck said:

    I just want to be clear, I'm not out there on the limb with Canard. I just don't think he's as full of shit as some people out here (Hi Kim!).

    Canard went full retard when he said 0regon was smart to ensure continued mediocrity by promoting sling blade as HC instead of hiring Petersen.

    Then he compares the results of a new coach (with a new system) to an assistant who was promoted from within.

    Blowing shit up and starting over will take longer than making a quick fix.

    Hellfrick may have already peaked with his two losses per year. Yet, Pete is a failure because he lost two games in his first (half) year at UW when the team lost four the prior year.

    Canard FS. No other way to put it.
    RIF, motherfucker.

    I have not said Oregon was smart for hiring Slingblade, I said they were smart for passing right over Petersen. At this stage in our program's evolution, we don't need someone coming along and blowing shit up for a step back to dinosaur ball.

    And I have never compared anything between Slingblade and peterman except their salaries. We were paying our mad scientist in excess of $4 mil per to do his thing. We're paying Igor relative wait and see peanuts as to whether he can keep things humming while learning OTJ.

    You're paying Chip type money for CP to blow shit up that maybe just could have started off with a remodeling instead. You're also paying Chip type money to a coach that went 8-4 in his last regular season, and whose former team was undressed in Hawaii by the most voluntarily one dimensional bLeavers squads ever fielded.

    I have been comparing peterman to chip. Peterman won big with Zabransky, who was serviceable and played in Canada, and with Moore, who is still clip boarding in the NFL. Southwick? Miley? lungfish? Nothing.

    Chip turned Dixon from a guy with the yips into an NFL back-up. He got a nobody named Justin Roeper from being part of a dismal shutout at UCLA to winning the Sun Bowl six weeks later. He tolerated Masoli, and built the offense around him long enough to get to the Rose Bowl. He guided future arena footballer Darron Thomas into the Natty in his first year as starter and then a Rose Bowl victory the next. He had Mariota winning the Fiesta in his first year as starter.

    That's what the coaching profile of a guy eventually making $6.5 million per in the NFL looks like. The point is Chip modified his system for no fewer than five different major QB changes in seven collegiate seasons, and then twice more in two seasons in the NFL. You'd think Pete could do it four times in nine seasons with a modicum of success.

  • Vegasdawg
    Vegasdawg Member Posts: 370
    What is funny is that Peterman has been saying this since day 1, and how we filtered it out believing we had the talent, speed and experience to win big this year. Compare what we line up each week with what he said in the post, and then estimate how long it will take for the talent infusion, speed, maturing of the program and discipline to represent our team.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club

    Passion said:



    If you don't think UW has inherent & exceptional recruiting advantages, then you're dumber than most of the trash that fills autzen stadium every week.

    First of all, LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION. People love Seattle. It's reached a point where people hear the word "Seattle," and they immediately think "great place to live." End of story.

    The UW has an elite academic reputation and the rankings to prove it, unlike the three glorified community colleges that make up the rest of the northwest's pac-12 schools.

    UW is a stone throw from some of the hottest tech companies in the world, so there is opportunity here outside of football. Not so in pullman, pewgene or corvalis.

    Fan support - Awesome & well-known.

    Are we getting all the OKGs we want right now? No, but we have advantages that are simply unmatched by most other schools.

    Seattle's a draw for unemployed liberal arts majors who think that $15/hr pouring coffee is beneath them, until they're still in that job a year later with massive student debt that they can't pay back to Uncle Sucker. For an 18 year-old elite athlete? It's much easier to just stick with the UCLAs/USCs/OUs/Bamas of the world. It took Oregon years of winning and hundreds of millions dollars in facility upgrades to start attracting those type of players to the point of getting in the door, and the Ducks still rarely get the truly elite difference-makers.
    UO grad, lives in Portland, his job has a "slow" season...
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Marcus Mariota was a 3*
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Marcus Mariota was a 3*

    Most ducks are.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    I could do without Peterman's coach speak, I think we all get where he's coming from and it's unnecessary at this point.
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,332

    brchco12 said:



    this is why oregon fans are fags, they dont show up until after the game

    EwaDawg said:

    AZDuck said:

    I just want to be clear, I'm not out there on the limb with Canard. I just don't think he's as full of shit as some people out here (Hi Kim!).

    Canard went full retard when he said 0regon was smart to ensure continued mediocrity by promoting sling blade as HC instead of hiring Petersen.

    Then he compares the results of a new coach (with a new system) to an assistant who was promoted from within.

    Blowing shit up and starting over will take longer than making a quick fix.

    Hellfrick may have already peaked with his two losses per year. Yet, Pete is a failure because he lost two games in his first (half) year at UW when the team lost four the prior year.

    Canard FS. No other way to put it.
    Slingblade 1
    CoachPeeth 0

    Coach Pete 2
    Slingblade 1

    You can't take away Peteman's wins as HC just because your assistant has been named interim head coach.

  • PDXDuckFan
    PDXDuckFan Member Posts: 450
    EwaDawg said:

    brchco12 said:



    this is why oregon fans are fags, they dont show up until after the game

    EwaDawg said:

    AZDuck said:

    I just want to be clear, I'm not out there on the limb with Canard. I just don't think he's as full of shit as some people out here (Hi Kim!).

    Canard went full retard when he said 0regon was smart to ensure continued mediocrity by promoting sling blade as HC instead of hiring Petersen.

    Then he compares the results of a new coach (with a new system) to an assistant who was promoted from within.

    Blowing shit up and starting over will take longer than making a quick fix.

    Hellfrick may have already peaked with his two losses per year. Yet, Pete is a failure because he lost two games in his first (half) year at UW when the team lost four the prior year.

    Canard FS. No other way to put it.
    Slingblade 1
    CoachPeeth 0

    Coach Pete 2
    Slingblade 1

    You can't take away Peteman's wins as HC just because your assistant has been named interim head coach.

    Technically it would be 1-1, since Helfrich didn't start coaching at UO until 2009. DOOOOOOG gonna Doog...
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Swaye said:

    This thread started strong. Now it's like a slap fight. For retards.

    I hope you don't have retards.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    Swaye said:

    This thread started strong. Now it's like a slap fight. For retards.

    I hope you don't have retards.
    I don't plan to procreate. Praise Allah.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Swaye said:

    dnc said:

    Swaye said:

    This thread started strong. Now it's like a slap fight. For retards.

    I hope you don't have retards.
    I don't plan to procreate. Praise Allah.
    Just trying to bait @Passion into this retard slap fight

    image

  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Some of you guys are really fucking stupid.

    Sark suddenly left us with a loaded team after 5 years of not recruiting well?

    Peterson should be able to beat Oregon in Oregon by game 7 because, well just because we really want him to?

    LIFPO

    Jeez

  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,241 Founders Club
    Canard said:

    Tequilla said:

    My head hurts after reading this thread ...

    Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.

    The military does it within months all of the time. You jump out of a plane at Fort Bragg and you stand a good chance of your parachute having been rigged by some PFC on the job less than a year. Sure, the soldier is supervised by someone else ultimately accountable, but that shit is called coaching in other contexts.

    It's not impossible to rapidly train someone to life and death levels of responsibility, it's just difficult. Charles DeGaulle had a saying, "The graveyards are full of indispensible men," meaning that you do what you must with who you have, not wallow in excuses about who ain't there.

    Requiring special people or oodles of time to become highly effective in football when a roster has bright spots of talent available should be a major cause for concern. Oh well, your problem.
    As HH's senior military correspondent, I disagree and say you're a fucktard because you're comparing apples to refrigerators. A PFC packing a chute (rigger please!) does that one thing repeatedly. The only competitions for his time and attention are beer and pussy.

    Compare that to a college football player who is learning the playbook, thinking about beer and pussy and also concerned about school (or concerned about someone going to school for him).
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    And the private is prolly smarter than the average CTE case.
  • Fenwick
    Fenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    thechatch said:

    At least you have a coach that takes a little ownership for the product on the field. We are just so young. Some calls didn't go our way. We just have a lot of injuries. We were 0-12 tour years ago. The weather was definitely a factor. We are a couple of calls away from being a 10 win team.

    God that shit got fucking old.

    And I'm a duck.

    Gawd yes. I remember thinking that no team, even the Huskies, should be treated with such disrespect and by their coach no less. He treated the team and fans like fools. Damn.