Worse than Montana?
Comments
-
Yeap, super sark ish let down after beating a team with a pulse drop a road game to a weak program.
Also, finally getting ranked during a bye week only to get embarrassed in the worst way nationally .
-
I didn’t say it was worse than Montana. I asked if it was.
some of you need to learn the difference
-
2017 loss at ASU was really bad. 13-7 to a team I believe won only 4 games. Was also a much better UW team that lost and ASU wasn’t a big and physical last place B10 team so poor Washington should have been able to score two touchdowns. Win that and you’re probably in the semi finals again. Awful loss.
-
2017 ASU.
UW doesn't have the OL to throw it over and over when an average+ defense knows it's coming.
Almost the same issue as Petersen. Overly complicated pass happy offense.
-
Ok, first of all, it's a little pedantic to say "people [who] follow college football know …." on this forum. Just think about it for a minute.
And your fetish for subdivision football notwithstanding, those losses are so rare that people still talk about them decades after they happened. People still give Michigan shit for losing to App State in 2007.
The talent across the board at Wisconsin is on another level from that at Montana. The offensive lines are not even a conversation.
Look at their schedule and results and tell me what it would look like if Montana were subbed in. Come on. We talk about grease around here for a reason.
-
Well by following cfb I mean the whole thing not just FBS.
I don't think losses to FCS are all that rare. When it does happen it is contender FCS team and a middling FBS team that expected to win just cuz .
