Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Petersen's comments...presented without comment
Comments
-
Pete pulled in 4 4* as well as 90% of the class in the 2 months he had after getting hired. those 4* guys weren't interested in UW.PDXDuckFan said:
He's never had to before. Do you think he's magically going to start landing multiple 4-5* players? Take a look at UW's verbals this year compared to the Sark/Tosh years.brchco12 said:
yup, Pete will never learn to recruit like a twink from New Hampshire did
You can bash Chip Kelly all you want, and yes, Peterman did beat Chip on the field, but you'll be creaming your pants if Peterman has even half the success Kelly had at UO. Hell, I think you'll be creaming if you can even reach Slingblade levels of success.
5 4* so far this year, including a QB who fits his system and chose us over alabama.
I'm not saying he's going to have the onfield success of chip, but to say he's somehow never going to be able to recruit at a high level, or even a mediocre level like his predecessor is duckFS.
I'm honestly confused why people think recruiting wont be good under Pete, every bit of data we have proves the opposite.
-
Five 4* players according to which site? Every site I've seen has the Dawgs with two 4* players.brchco12 said:
5 4* so far this year, including a QB who fits his system and chose us over alabama.
http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=Pac-12
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-sports/football/recruiting/classrankings?action=login
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/teamrank/2015/PAC12/all
Is Cody Bruns being counted as a 4* again?
-
Fuck ...PDXDuckFan said:
He's never had to before. Do you think he's magically going to start landing multiple 4-5* players? Take a look at UW's verbals this year compared to the Sark/Tosh years.brchco12 said:
yup, Pete will never learn to recruit like a twink from New Hampshire did
You can bash Chip Kelly all you want, and yes, Peterman did beat Chip on the field, but you'll be creaming your pants if Peterman has even half the success Kelly had at UO. Hell, I think you'll be creaming if you can even reach Slingblade levels of success.
Kelly also didn't have an entire new coaching staff. The long-time Oregon assistants have spent years getting recruiting pipelines in CA and TX. Going from Bellotti to Kelly didn't make much difference, since the staff was the same.
You are one stupid mother fucker.
Chip Kelly was a bumpkin from New Hampshire who drove a broke down Volvo when he showed up in Eugene. Nobody but Bellotti knew who he was.
Any team would love to have Chip as their coach, he is a great coach.
Slingblade ... let's reserve judgement on him in 2 more years when he isn't surfing in Chip's wake.
All of Peterman's staff has been working the west coast ... you dumb fuck.
Jesus ...
And from an earlier post ...
Kids in Texas don't dream of moving to Eugene ...
Oregon has done well ... great program ... I wish dipshits like you knew how to use a fork. -
holy shit we're not arguing about star ratings, you are a fucking moron
-
They haven't been recruiting Pac12 players ... you dumb fuck. Boise gets the dumbshits who couldn't get into a Pac12 school, or the lesser players while Sark and Kelly were recruiting their better teammates. Peteman had better win this year, because losing those NFL guys on defense is going to make for a tough 2015, along with losing 4/5 of the OL.topdawgnc said:
All of Peterman's staff has been working the west coast ... you dumb fuck.
-
Well of course you're not going to argue it. I just made you out to be a complete dipshit about your own team's recruiting this year.brchco12 said:holy shit we're not arguing about star ratings, you are a fucking moron
Five 4* guys in this glass. Just shoot yourself.
-
Fuck me for poasting this linkPDXDuckFan said:
Five 4* players according to which site? Every site I've seen has the Dawgs with two 4* players.brchco12 said:
5 4* so far this year, including a QB who fits his system and chose us over alabama.
http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=Pac-12
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-sports/football/recruiting/classrankings?action=login
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/teamrank/2015/PAC12/all
Is Cody Bruns being counted as a 4* again?
-
PDXDuckFan said:
Five 4* players according to which site? Every site I've seen has the Dawgs with two 4* players.brchco12 said:
5 4* so far this year, including a QB who fits his system and chose us over alabama.
http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=Pac-12
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-sports/football/recruiting/classrankings?action=login
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/teamrank/2015/PAC12/all
Is Cody Bruns being counted as a 4* again? -
I never claimed they did, and I said that even though UO tries recruiting the big-time players, more often than not they lose out to a UCLA, USC, or a Notre Dame. I was responding to the Doog who was claiming that Seattle is some big draw for players. LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION. It's not. It may as well be Eugene, except that in Eugene players throw snowballs, while at UW the starting QB beats up Seahawk fans for fun.topdawgnc said:
And from an earlier post ...
Kids in Texas don't dream of moving to Eugene ...
-
You say it like it's a bad thingPDXDuckFan said:
I never claimed they did, and I said that even though UO tries recruiting the big-time players, more often than not they lose out to a UCLA, USC, or a Notre Dame. I was responding to the Doog who was claiming that Seattle is some big draw for players. LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION. It's not. It may as well be Eugene, except that in Eugene players throw snowballs, while at UW the starting QB beats up Seahawk fans for fun.topdawgnc said:
And from an earlier post ...
Kids in Texas don't dream of moving to Eugene ...
