Petersen's comments...presented without comment
"...Any given Saturday we all know weird things can happen. That’s an elite team. I really think so. And so we knew some of the matchups would be tough. I think probably the thing that I’m most looking for is our attention to our detail. Regardless of talent level, can we just execute with precision, in terms of tackling, gap responsibility and gap integrity and not losing our eyes. All these things we talk about forever and work on every day, but when you start getting on your heels, and somebody mentioned I think after the game, some of your guys trying too hard, somebody said they might have been trying too hard, and you talk so much about just do your job. Just do your job. Don’t do someone else’s job until you have to, until you see the ball. Well, when they’re moving the ball, moving the ball, moving the ball, and all of a sudden you think he’s got it and you start to slide and a really fast quarterback pulls it out, a really fast back bounces it, you see what can happen when you stay on your heels.”
"...I think it comes back to what we were talking about early on. I think it’s all about details. We talk about details in the running game, details in the passing game. We’re not a detailed enough team right now. And certainly some of that credit goes to the opponent. When they play good, make it really, really hard on you, margin for error’s really, really thin."
"...So, talent. Details. Been doing that system for a long time and they play fast and they play hard and know what they’re doing. And then how hard are you going to compete.”
Comments
-
That's exactly what I want to hear. So refreshing as opposed to Dude Brah's excuses.
-
yeah, but we all have to agree that this one game is not indicative of the caliber of dumpster fire we are, no question.
If you take away those 4 90+ yard drives this would have been a different game and we'd be 6-1.
we need to tighten some things up, then play loose. Focus on the details, but not think too much.
quite honestly we're almost there, 2017 will be special. -
We're a clown stomping away from a top 5 ranking
-
We're four 90+ yard drives away from being a top 5 team
-
For whatever reason...brchco12 said:yeah, but we all have to agree that this one game is not indicative of the caliber of dumpster fire we are, no question.
If you take away those 4 90+ yard drives this would have been a different game and we'd be 6-1.
we need to tighten some things up, then play loose. Focus on the details, but not think too much.
quite honestly we're almost there, 2017 will be special. -
Glad I don't have to read such babble all of the time.
Not detail oriented enough? Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't this fuck stick been on the job since before LOI day?
Let's see. Suspended Miley from OTAs until fall, so no detailing possible. The on field result would be the same or better (Stanford=W) if Miley had been kicked to the curb and Black Power groomed from spring ball on. Maybe even a better performance last Saturday because BP has more upside. No, the Idaho Spud but his off season prep time into Lungfish. Beer goggles? Rayciss?
The defense is not untalented. They do need help from the offense. That hairball of fail on O is on Petey. You'd think a truly excellent coach not only identifies the QB he can rake with, but he adapts "his system" to the talent available, not give pressers wishing for talent that is not on the roster.
John Ross would seemingly excel in any offensive system. That this UW offense is not built around attempting to get that guy the ball in space at least 20-30 times a game is something that should be howled about. Straddled run/pass option with Ross being the pitch target, WR screens, fly sweeps, ISO motion man busters. Anything. Everything. It ain't rocket science to feed the best offensive player.
Evidently, that's not a detail worthy of hard questioning. -
Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
-
Did Pete sleep with Canard's husband?
-
Was Canard molested by one of his two dads?
-
CaTard
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! -
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going? -
Just fraud busting. I was right about the chinless Armenian, and I am right about CP, who wasn't ever on our short list when belly skipped town.RaceBannon said:Did Pete sleep with Canard's husband?
You'll see. -
Yes.Canard said:
John Ross would seemingly excel in any offensive system. That this UW offense is not built around attempting to get that guy the ball in space at least 20-30 times a game is something that should be howled about. Straddled run/pass option with Ross being the pitch target, WR screens, fly sweeps, ISO motion man busters. Anything. Everything. It ain't rocket science to feed the best offensive player.
Evidently, that's not a detail worthy of hard questioning.
I agree.
The coach who went 92-12 and beat some of the biggest names and teams in the sport ... under the hottest of lights ... clearly needs coaching advice from a group of stained sweatpants wearing perverts on a message board dissecting the game from their mom's basement.
Not every coach can walk into the best of situations ...
I'm pissed, but unlike the line of fucktards Washington has hired for this role I believe in the current coach. -
yeah, but stillCanard said:Glad I don't have to read such babble all of the time.
Not detail oriented enough? Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't this fuck stick been on the job since before LOI day?
Let's see. Suspended Miley from OTAs until fall, so no detailing possible. The on field result would be the same or better (Stanford=W) if Miley had been kicked to the curb and Black Power groomed from spring ball on. Maybe even a better performance last Saturday because BP has more upside. No, the Idaho Spud but his off season prep time into Lungfish. Beer goggles? Rayciss?
The defense is not untalented. They do need help from the offense. That hairball of fail on O is on Petey. You'd think a truly excellent coach not only identifies the QB he can rake with, but he adapts "his system" to the talent available, not give pressers wishing for talent that is not on the roster.
John Ross would seemingly excel in any offensive system. That this UW offense is not built around attempting to get that guy the ball in space at least 20-30 times a game is something that should be howled about. Straddled run/pass option with Ross being the pitch target, WR screens, fly sweeps, ISO motion man busters. Anything. Everything. It ain't rocket science to feed the best offensive player.
Evidently, that's not a detail worthy of hard questioning. -
Who the fuck said he needed advice from the proles?topdawgnc said:
Yes.Canard said:
John Ross would seemingly excel in any offensive system. That this UW offense is not built around attempting to get that guy the ball in space at least 20-30 times a game is something that should be howled about. Straddled run/pass option with Ross being the pitch target, WR screens, fly sweeps, ISO motion man busters. Anything. Everything. It ain't rocket science to feed the best offensive player.
Evidently, that's not a detail worthy of hard questioning.
I agree.
The coach who went 92-12 and beat some of the biggest names and teams in the sport ... under the hottest of lights ... clearly needs coaching advice from a group of stained sweatpants wearing perverts on a message board dissecting the game from their mom's basement.
Not every coach can walk into the best of situations ...
I'm pissed, but unlike the line of fucktards Washington has hired for this role I believe in the current coach.
He needs to be asked some very pointed questions that can't be washed over by his oral diarrhea.
Softball pressers FTW. -
If you don't think UW has inherent & exceptional recruiting advantages, then you're dumber than most of the trash that fills autzen stadium every week.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
First of all, LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION. People love Seattle. It's reached a point where people hear the word "Seattle," and they immediately think "great place to live." End of story.
The UW has an elite academic reputation and the rankings to prove it, unlike the three glorified community colleges that make up the rest of the northwest's pac-12 schools.
UW is a stone throw from some of the hottest tech companies in the world, so there is opportunity here outside of football. Not so in pullman, pewgene or corvalis.
Fan support - Awesome & well-known.
Are we getting all the OKGs we want right now? No, but we have advantages that are simply unmatched by most other schools. -
Who cares?
Hard to disagree with most of that. Great coaches can mold their system's to fit what they have. There is no Kellen Moore on the roster. Giving Ross the ball 20-30 times a game is great if you're playing a 3 game season, but I do agree he needs to get the ball more.Canard said:Glad I don't have to read such babble all of the time.
Not detail oriented enough? Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't this fuck stick been on the job since before LOI day?
Let's see. Suspended Miley from OTAs until fall, so no detailing possible. The on field result would be the same or better (Stanford=W) if Miley had been kicked to the curb and Black Power groomed from spring ball on. Maybe even a better performance last Saturday because BP has more upside. No, the Idaho Spud but his off season prep time into Lungfish. Beer goggles? Rayciss?
The defense is not untalented. They do need help from the offense. That hairball of fail on O is on Petey. You'd think a truly excellent coach not only identifies the QB he can rake with, but he adapts "his system" to the talent available, not give pressers wishing for talent that is not on the roster.
John Ross would seemingly excel in any offensive system. That this UW offense is not built around attempting to get that guy the ball in space at least 20-30 times a game is something that should be howled about. Straddled run/pass option with Ross being the pitch target, WR screens, fly sweeps, ISO motion man busters. Anything. Everything. It ain't rocket science to feed the best offensive player.
Evidently, that's not a detail worthy of hard questioning.
I don't really care what he says at this point, I want to see improvement on the field -
You're a fucking donkey.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Peterman has earned the right to be in the same conversations as Saban and Stoops regarding caliber. 92-12 fucking means something in today's world. So does wins over Stoops, and Kelly.
Washington has facilities, education, and location to be a competitor. Even a donkey like you knows that ... it's the very reason you lurk around here showing your 2 inches of thunder. You know if Washington every gets serious again it could be a good rivalry. The problem is the dumb fucks who think Lockner is a good QB and Sark is a good coach .... -
Sark reads that and says to himself, "I don't understand. What is he saying? I'm confused so I will make a few dumbass faces and don my stupid hats and that will make me feel better"
-
Aubbie? Is that you? Some mean iron lawing going on.
Stupid academic smack that matters not a bit to Swahili and sociology majors and ignorance that Seattle is a college media attention backwater, and you don't even answer the question put forth. Are you up there with okie and Bama in recruiting allure? Were you ever there? Be fucking honest with yourself.
The UW heyday I witnessed as it happened was built on a foundation of Washington prep true believers rounded out with some elite speed from SoCal. Was there the odd out of state recruiting coup? Of course, but the composition of the squads had a distinctly regional flavor.
However, the college game has changed since then. A bunch of white boys on steroids can no longer be the core of a team. Same affliction Nebraska has suffered from, btw. You weren't bama or Oklahoma on the trail back in the day, and you certainly aren't now either.
I am not the one comparing CP+UW as remotely equivalent to Stoops+OU or NS+bama. I say all kinds of stupid shit, but those kinds of linkages are the ol cake takers for fucktardedness. -
I don't know about Saban. That guy runs an amazing fucking program. But Stoops? What the fuck? If Florida State has their leading receiver and top offensive weapon for the title game, the guy may not even have one title. I'll grant you that when he was a D coordinator he was solid in that category, and he's a damn good coach. Love to have him. But, yeah, why the fuck wouldn't I put Petersen in his category? He beat Stoops head to head in a game that mattered, and he did it with a washing machine strapped onto his back.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Does UW have Oklahoma or Alabama brand? No, of course not. Does CP need it? Not so sure. There is so much fucking talent out there, and the kids these days want to PLAY, not sit, because the really good ones view cfb as a three-year proposition at best. This is how TCU and Baylor come to exist as they do today.
Oregon has done a great job of recruiting all over the fucking place, including places in which UW has never had any real traction. I admire the fucking shit out of Oregon's boldness to basically say, "Oklahoma, Notre Dame, USC, Michigan, blah blah blah blah blah ... we're going in and we're competing against those schools wherever so fuck off if you don't like it."
Oregon laughed right back at all the royotis-type fags who laughed at them for taking a novel approach to an old problem. Washington's biggest problem, as you suggest, is that it has been so mired in this tired idea/fantasy that it has this vaunted tradition. This is where you get the "rightful place with USC" bullshit, which is, of course, patently absurd on so many levels.
I think CP is good enough to know that he doesn't need to follow the old formula. I think he's aware that if Oregon can make inroads in Texas and Florida and Louisiana, then maybe he/Washington can too.
-
My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way. -
The military does it within months all of the time. You jump out of a plane at Fort Bragg and you stand a good chance of your parachute having been rigged by some PFC on the job less than a year. Sure, the soldier is supervised by someone else ultimately accountable, but that shit is called coaching in other contexts.Tequilla said:My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.
It's not impossible to rapidly train someone to life and death levels of responsibility, it's just difficult. Charles DeGaulle had a saying, "The graveyards are full of indispensible men," meaning that you do what you must with who you have, not wallow in excuses about who ain't there.
Requiring special people or oodles of time to become highly effective in football when a roster has bright spots of talent available should be a major cause for concern. Oh well, your problem. -
Canard,
We're not talking about the military here ... we're talking about athletes.
How often do you see PROFESSIONAL players that fail to grasp the details? -
What the fuck are you blabbering about? Sounding like AoG.Canard said:
The military does it within months all of the time. You jump out of a plane at Fort Bragg and you stand a good chance of your parachute having been rigged by some PFC on the job less than a year. Sure, the soldier is supervised by someone else ultimately accountable, but that shit is called coaching in other contexts.Tequilla said:My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.
It's not impossible to rapidly train someone to life and death levels of responsibility, it's just difficult. Charles DeGaulle had a saying, "The graveyards are full of indispensible men," meaning that you do what you must with who you have, not wallow in excuses about who ain't there.
Requiring special people or oodles of time to become highly effective in football when a roster has bright spots of talent available should be a major cause for concern. Oh well, your problem. -
92-12 mostly compiled in the minors makes you a AAAA phenom, not a major league hall of fame playa. The grinds and seasonal attrition are in no way comparable between the top level and the also ran level. In many ways that matter in big boy football, CCP is next to untested.topdawgnc said:
You're a fucking donkey.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Peterman has earned the right to be in the same conversations as Saban and Stoops regarding caliber. 92-12 fucking means something in today's world. So does wins over Stoops, and Kelly.
Washington has facilities, education, and location to be a competitor. Even a donkey like you knows that ... it's the very reason you lurk around here showing your 2 inches of thunder. You know if Washington every gets serious again it could be a good rivalry. The problem is the dumb fucks who think Lockner is a good QB and Sark is a good coach ....
Pete does it week in and out going forward posting a .750+ win rate, (while also closeting the plunger that chased Sark around), and I'll be the first to recant my heresy.
But if you can't see the Sark Stank as a watery version the of Owen-12 excuse for Seven, well no helping and all. -
Too short, did read.Tequilla said:My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.
Tequilla, who stole your log in?
And, BTW, for once I agree. But when you make as many fucktarded statements as Canard, one of them has to be the most fucktarded. Its just math. -
Wasn't Petersen's record vs. BCS teams something like 10-3 in his time at BSU? He also had a winning record against top 25 teams. I'm just not sure how C'Tard can explain that away
-
Canard is spiraling out of control in this thread.
Did he really just compare living in barracks 24/7 training to kill to a college athlete living in dorms with practice hour restrictions, classes, and social life?
Holee Fuck. -
That's why every coach who is employed by a mid major is 92-12.Canard said:
92-12 mostly compiled in the minors makes you a AAAA phenom, not a major league hall of fame playa. The grinds and seasonal attrition are in no way comparable between the top level and the also ran level. In many ways that matter in big boy football, CPC is next to untested.topdawgnc said:
You're a fucking donkey.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Peterman has earned the right to be in the same conversations as Saban and Stoops regarding caliber. 92-12 fucking means something in today's world. So does wins over Stoops, and Kelly.
Washington has facilities, education, and location to be a competitor. Even a donkey like you knows that ... it's the very reason you lurk around here showing your 2 inches of thunder. You know if Washington every gets serious again it could be a good rivalry. The problem is the dumb fucks who think Lockner is a good QB and Sark is a good coach ....
Pete does it week in and out going forward posting a .750+ win rate, (while also closeting the plunger that chased Sark around), and I'll be the first to recant my heresy.
But if you can't see the Sark Stank as a watery version the of Owen-12 excuse for Seven, well no helping and all.
Dude ...
You're a donkey. Quit while you're a head.
