Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Rick Neuheisal And The Snitch?
RoadDawg55
Member Posts: 30,397
I remember when Rick was fired in 2003, there was a lot of talk about the "snitch." Many names were mentioned such as Condotta and Rick Redmond. Did it ever come out who the snitch was?
Comments
-
Take this to the Harry Potter Fan Fiction Board.
Also if anyone knows the answer I'd be interested to hear. -
Condotta came up repeatedly from my personal circle of sources. Consorts had a wazzu sticker in his car, that is the PROOF.
-
Softy Mahler was the snitch.
Hope this helps. -
The snitch worked for the program.
HTH. -
I'm hearing it was a mick bastard loser
-
That's what I just said.IrishDawg22 said:The snitch worked for the program.
HTH. -
Found you a sponsor for your podcast:RaceBannon said:I'm hearing it was a mick bastard loser

I will waive my normal finder's fee.
-
Slick Rick won a RB Washington would be lucky to have a guy like slick. He did it the RIGHT WAY won with Lambo's guys. Slick also has a NW championship, Sark can't even sniff his jock.
-
I love how Doogs always contradict themselves and use revisionist history when talking about Rick.jecornel said:Slick Rick won a RB Washington would be lucky to have a guy like slick. He did it the RIGHT WAY won with Lambo's guys. Slick also has a NW championship, Sark can't even sniff his jock.
- "He only won with Lambo's guys" implying that team was so talented that anyone could have won there. Well guess what? Lambo couldn't win with Lambo's guys and had three teams more talented than the 2000 team. Also same doogs who say that never say "Sark only won a bowl game with Ty Willingham's guys" which that team had almost all Ty recruits.
- They refuse to acknowledge what a great coaching job Rick did in 2000. From a talent perspective I'd take the 1994, 1996, 1997, 2002 and 2003 teams over that one in 2000. Plus you add in the midseason tragedy of Curtis Williams and how Rick didn't allow that to be a distraction instead embraced it.
- Refuse to acknowledge that Rick was a great offensive mind unlike Sark. Rick made adjustments which Sark doesn't do. Rick came here trying to run a pro style offense and UW started off 0-2 and he realized after two fucking games that was a bad idea. So he ran the option offense something he had never done before playing to Tui's strength. While Sark faced a similar situation with Locker and refused to change going 12-13 with Jake when he should have gone 16-9 by simply turning Jake into a spread QB.
- They get on Rick for being soft, neglecting the OL, having star players get in trouble, have a bad season(7-6) yet completely ignore/don't care that Sark is doing that.
I don't think Rick is a great coach but he's sure as hell better than Sark is. Sark in every way is a poor version of Rick.
Firing Rick in June of 2003 was the start of many dumb moves that this Administration has made in the past decade. -
Not sure where you are getting your information from, but I'm pretty sure half your butt buddies on this site were just described in your post. Yet, I'm the biggest fucking doog around and agree with your point of view on Rick. He won a fucking Rose Bowl.....works for me.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I love how Doogs always contradict themselves and use revisionist history when talking about Rick.jecornel said:Slick Rick won a RB Washington would be lucky to have a guy like slick. He did it the RIGHT WAY won with Lambo's guys. Slick also has a NW championship, Sark can't even sniff his jock.
- "He only won with Lambo's guys" implying that team was so talented that anyone could have won there. Well guess what? Lambo couldn't win with Lambo's guys and had three teams more talented than the 2000 team. Also same doogs who say that never say "Sark only won a bowl game with Ty Willingham's guys" which that team had almost all Ty recruits.
- They refuse to acknowledge what a great coaching job Rick did in 2000. From a talent perspective I'd take the 1994, 1996, 1997, 2002 and 2003 teams over that one in 2000. Plus you add in the midseason tragedy of Curtis Williams and how Rick didn't allow that to be a distraction instead embraced it.
- Refuse to acknowledge that Rick was a great offensive mind unlike Sark. Rick made adjustments which Sark doesn't do. Rick came here trying to run a pro style offense and UW started off 0-2 and he realized after two fucking games that was a bad idea. So he ran the option offense something he had never done before playing to Tui's strength. While Sark faced a similar situation with Locker and refused to change going 12-13 with Jake when he should have gone 16-9 by simply turning Jake into a spread QB.
- They get on Rick for being soft, neglecting the OL, having star players get in trouble, have a bad season(7-6) yet completely ignore/don't care that Sark is doing that.
I don't think Rick is a great coach but he's sure as hell better than Sark is. Sark in every way is a poor version of Rick.
Firing Rick in June of 2003 was the start of many dumb moves that this Administration has made in the past decade.




