You should read more. The IAEA had some CCTV cameras but surprise inspections were not allowed. Your premise is what? That there was no ongoing enrichment but the Iranians thought that having it all blown to sh*t was worth not having inspections which would find nothing? The IAEA position was that they were at 60% enrichment and could quickly get to the 90% for a functioning bomb.
Comments
Main points? I've agreed with everything Trump has done and it's not because I'm subservient to Israel.
How is the premise that this facility was "lawful" and "inspected" supportable given the UN's position that Iran had ceased to cooperate?
You should read more. The IAEA had some CCTV cameras but surprise inspections were not allowed. Your premise is what? That there was no ongoing enrichment but the Iranians thought that having it all blown to sh*t was worth not having inspections which would find nothing? The IAEA position was that they were at 60% enrichment and could quickly get to the 90% for a functioning bomb.
Without reading it, the obvious answer is yes.
meanwhile little Mikey is threatening to arrest anyone who interrupts Bibi.
Imagine expecting free speech and decorum from the dems.